chore(ci): check the RustSec advisory database on a schedule, so a new advisory is found on main and not on someone's pull request
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
Nadie ha tomado este issue todavía.
Evaluación
- Dificultad
- 4/5
- Tiempo estimado
- 3-5 días
- Aptitud para principiantes
- 56/100
- Tipo de issue
- Nueva funcionalidad
- Claridad
- Bien especificado
- Estado de actividad
- Activo
- Stack tecnológico
- github-actions, rust
- Área
- ci-cd, documentation, security
Línea de trabajo
Read .github/workflows/ci.yml for the existing deny job and .github/workflows/flake-hunt.yml for the schedule precedent, then review deny.toml and the supply-chain section of ADR-0101. Add a scheduled, manually dispatchable advisory check and document its failure handling in docs/src/architecture/cicd.md and docs/src/contributing/standards.md; verify the documented control by removing the RUSTSEC-2023-0071 ignore on a throwaway branch and confirming the run names the advisory.
Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.
Descripción
Context
The deny job (added by #87, closing #40) runs cargo deny --locked check, which fetches the RustSec advisory database on every run, and it is in gate's needs, the only required check. So a newly published advisory turns the job red, and every Rust pull request with it, with no change to the code. Nothing looks at the database between pull requests, so the first person to find out is whoever happens to open one.
This is not hypothetical. When deny.toml was written, seven advisories already failed on main, and two of them (RUSTSEC-2026-0385 and -0387) had been published on 2026-10-23, three days after #40 was filed on 2026-10-20. They were found only because that work ran against the live database.
ci.yml triggers on pull_request, merge_group, push to main and workflow_dispatch. The only scheduled workflow is flake-hunt.yml (weekly).
Problem
- A new advisory is first seen on an unrelated pull request, which is then red for a reason it did not cause.
maincan be red-in-waiting for as long as nobody pushes.
Proposal
- A scheduled workflow that runs
cargo deny --locked check advisoriesagainstmain, with the same pinnedcargo-denyand the samedeny.toml, and fails visibly when an advisory appears. Decide how it tells someone: a failing scheduled run that watchers are notified of, or one tracking issue it opens and updates. Daily is probably right for something time-sensitive;flake-hunt.ymlis weekly. - Keep it out of
gate: it reports onmain, andgateis about the pull request in front of it. - Decide whether the pull-request
denyjob should keep the advisories check. Keeping it means an unrelated advisory blocks every pull request until it is fixed (today's behaviour, fail-closed). Dropping it tolicenses bans sourcesdecouples pull requests from drift but leaves advisories to the schedule alone. The schedule does not change which of those you pick; it only makes the warning arrive onmainfirst. - Note that
flake-hunt.ymlrecords that GitHub disables scheduled workflows in a public repository after 60 days without repository activity.
Acceptance criteria
- A scheduled workflow exists (actions pinned by SHA,
permissionsno wider than it needs) and can also be started byworkflow_dispatch. - The control: on a throwaway branch with the RUSTSEC-2023-0071 ignore deleted from
deny.toml, a dispatched run fails and names that advisory (as the throwaway pull request #88 did for the pull-request job). - What happens when it fails, and who is told, is written in
docs/src/architecture/cicd.md. That page anddocs/src/contributing/standards.md("Decided, and built only in part") now say there is no scheduled check of the advisory database; update both.
References
#40, #87; deny.toml; the deny job in .github/workflows/ci.yml; .github/workflows/flake-hunt.yml (the schedule precedent and the 60-day note); ADR-0101 (.agents/plans/contrail/adrs/ci/0101-ci-supply-chain.md); docs/src/architecture/cicd.md, "Permissions and supply chain".
- Lenguaje dominante
- Rust
- Estrellas
- 0
- Forks
- 0
- Merge medio
- 1 h 35 min
- PR fusionados (30 d)
- 67
Preparar el entorno
- Sin Dockerfile ni archivo de Docker Compose
- Sin plantilla de pull request
- Leer la guía de contribución
Primeros pasos
- Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
- Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
- Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
- Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.
Más de aRustyDev/thrust
-
area:process prio:p1 type:security
Dificultad 4/5 3-5 días Aptitud para principiantes 48/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
area:process bug prio:p1
Dificultad 4/5 3-5 días Aptitud para principiantes 38/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
area:process prio:p1
Dificultad 4/5 3-5 días Aptitud para principiantes 55/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
area:process prio:p1
Dificultad 4/5 1-2 días Aptitud para principiantes 55/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
area:app prio:p0 review:fable-2026-10-19
Dificultad 5/5 Más de una semana Aptitud para principiantes 25/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
Todos los issues de aRustyDev/thrust
Issues similares
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 68/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
bug
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 78/100
-
Clean master build fails in zune-jpeg error conversion and zero-IV array construction (patch)Abierto
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 72/100
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 78/100
CakeRepository/agentshangout#995 ·
-
area:frontend kind:bug priority:p3 ready
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 88/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día