Hacktoberfest 2026: los issues que los mantenedores marcaron para octubre, abiertos y aptos para principiantes. Explorar issues de Hacktoberfest

[Task][RFC]: Deliver human-confirmed operations across frontend and Lark

Abierto
  • ¿Algo no está bien?
#5,209 0 comentarios 0 reacciones 0 asignados Ver en GitHub

Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día

Nadie ha tomado este issue todavía.

Evaluación

Dificultad
5/5
Tiempo estimado
Más de una semana
Aptitud para principiantes
25/100
Tipo de issue
Nueva funcionalidad
Claridad
Bastante claro
Estado de actividad
Activo
Stack tecnológico
python, typescript
Área
backend-api-design, full-stack

Línea de trabajo

Read the linked RFC and coordinate with the existing typed-action and simulated-provider owners before choosing an unowned acceptance gap. Start with loopx/chat_action_store.py, loopx/chat_actions.py, loopx/extensions/lark/event_collector.py, and apps/presentation/dashboard/src/data/chat.ts. Done means the accepted scope is integrated across the required entrypoints, with commands and passed, failed, and untested evidence recorded; a merged PR alone is not completion.

Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.

Descripción

direction/architecture-evolution

Outcome / 目标

交付前端与 Lark 一致的人类确认操作。One task tracks this RFC's delivery; keep implementation PRs and milestone evidence here instead of creating a parallel task tree.

Canonical design: RFC. Roadmap: S8/S9, under #4574. Design acceptance is distinct from implementation, live qualification and promotion.

Current boundary

Source audit: main at ce3862e33 (2026-09-28). This is source/PR inspection, not a new test or live-qualification claim.

The RFC separates generic interaction authority, optional domain execution and venue adapters. Existing typed action and operation-card work must be inventoried before adding anything; M1 requires a simulated consumer plus both entrypoints.

Work remaining

  • Complete the generic preview/confirm/execute/reconcile/return lifecycle through the existing typed-action owner and authenticated callback path.
  • Use one optional simulated domain consumer for M1; keep domain reservation/precision/state with that provider. M2/M3 remain separately gated.

Ownership and ongoing work

Coordinate with current generic operation-card and simulated-provider work. Do not open a competing approval/financial ledger. This public task authorizes no trading, payment, account mutation, credential setup or live order; M3 requires the RFC’s exact user authorization.

Contribution route: implementation/integration overlaps active work. Start from the linked current owners/PRs and identify an unowned acceptance gap in a claim comment; do not begin a competing rewrite.

Acceptance

  • The same exact request confirmed from two entrypoints executes once; stale/rejected/expired confirmations cannot execute.
  • Ambiguous submission, restart and duplicate callback recover one outcome and return it to the originating conversation.
  • Packaged frontend, Lark and receipt readback agree; default-off and protected-operation boundaries hold.
  • Reconcile the RFC's current delivery checkpoint and this issue with the integrated revision, commands, passed/failed/untested evidence and remaining gates. Close the accepted scope only; no claim that a merged PR alone completes the RFC.

Starting points and delivery boundary

Base: latest main. Reuse the existing typed owner and provider boundaries. Include affected CLI/frontend/Lark companions; verify real entrypoints and backend where changed. Preserve existing first-screen review and maintainer merge gates. Public artifacts contain only synthetic/public-safe evidence, no private operational state. This task does not authorize provider promotion, benchmark launches, release/deployment or unrelated protected effects.

Lenguaje dominante
Python
Estrellas
6.2k
Forks
596
Merge medio
7 h 35 min
PR fusionados (30 d)
928

Preparar el entorno

Primeros pasos

  1. Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
  2. Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
  3. Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
  4. Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.

Más de loopx-project/loopx

Todos los issues de loopx-project/loopx

Issues similares

Más issues de Python

Recibe los nuevos issues en tu correo

Un resumen breve de issues de GitHub para principiantes.