Hacktoberfest 2026:维护者为十月标记出来的 issue,仍然开放、适合新手。 浏览 Hacktoberfest issue

[Task][RFC]: Deliver human-confirmed operations across frontend and Lark

未关闭
#5,209 0 条评论 0 个 reaction 已指派 0 人 在 GitHub 查看

维护者通常 1 天内回复

还没有人认领这个 Issue。

评估

难度
5/5
预计耗时
一周以上
新手友好度
25/100
Issue 类型
功能
描述清晰度
基本清楚
活跃度
活跃
技术栈
python, typescript

调研方向

Read the linked RFC and coordinate with the existing typed-action and simulated-provider owners before choosing an unowned acceptance gap. Start with loopx/chat_action_store.py, loopx/chat_actions.py, loopx/extensions/lark/event_collector.py, and apps/presentation/dashboard/src/data/chat.ts. Done means the accepted scope is integrated across the required entrypoints, with commands and passed, failed, and untested evidence recorded; a merged PR alone is not completion.

由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。

描述

direction/architecture-evolution

Outcome / 目标

交付前端与 Lark 一致的人类确认操作。One task tracks this RFC's delivery; keep implementation PRs and milestone evidence here instead of creating a parallel task tree.

Canonical design: RFC. Roadmap: S8/S9, under #4574. Design acceptance is distinct from implementation, live qualification and promotion.

Current boundary

Source audit: main at ce3862e33 (2026-09-28). This is source/PR inspection, not a new test or live-qualification claim.

The RFC separates generic interaction authority, optional domain execution and venue adapters. Existing typed action and operation-card work must be inventoried before adding anything; M1 requires a simulated consumer plus both entrypoints.

Work remaining

  • Complete the generic preview/confirm/execute/reconcile/return lifecycle through the existing typed-action owner and authenticated callback path.
  • Use one optional simulated domain consumer for M1; keep domain reservation/precision/state with that provider. M2/M3 remain separately gated.

Ownership and ongoing work

Coordinate with current generic operation-card and simulated-provider work. Do not open a competing approval/financial ledger. This public task authorizes no trading, payment, account mutation, credential setup or live order; M3 requires the RFC’s exact user authorization.

Contribution route: implementation/integration overlaps active work. Start from the linked current owners/PRs and identify an unowned acceptance gap in a claim comment; do not begin a competing rewrite.

Acceptance

  • The same exact request confirmed from two entrypoints executes once; stale/rejected/expired confirmations cannot execute.
  • Ambiguous submission, restart and duplicate callback recover one outcome and return it to the originating conversation.
  • Packaged frontend, Lark and receipt readback agree; default-off and protected-operation boundaries hold.
  • Reconcile the RFC's current delivery checkpoint and this issue with the integrated revision, commands, passed/failed/untested evidence and remaining gates. Close the accepted scope only; no claim that a merged PR alone completes the RFC.

Starting points and delivery boundary

Base: latest main. Reuse the existing typed owner and provider boundaries. Include affected CLI/frontend/Lark companions; verify real entrypoints and backend where changed. Preserve existing first-screen review and maintainer merge gates. Public artifacts contain only synthetic/public-safe evidence, no private operational state. This task does not authorize provider promotion, benchmark launches, release/deployment or unrelated protected effects.

主要语言
Python
星标
6.2k
派生
596
平均合并
6 小时 44 分钟
30 天内合并 PR
915

环境准备

从这里开始

  1. 先读完整个 Issue,再读项目的贡献指南。
  2. 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
  3. Fork 仓库,在一个分支上完成修改。
  4. 提交 Pull Request,并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。

loopx-project/loopx 的其他 Issue

查看 loopx-project/loopx 的全部 Issue

相似的 Issue

更多 Python Issue

把新 issue 发到你的邮箱

精选适合新手参与的 GitHub issue 摘要。