Hacktoberfest 2026: le issue che i maintainer hanno segnato per ottobre, aperte e adatte ai principianti. Sfoglia le issue Hacktoberfest

[Task][RFC]: Deliver human-confirmed operations across frontend and Lark

Aperta
  • Qualcosa non va?
#5,209 0 commenti 0 reazioni 0 assegnatari Vedi su GitHub

I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno

Nessuno ha ancora preso questa issue.

Valutazione

Difficoltà
5/5
Tempo stimato
Più di una settimana
Idoneità per principianti
25/100
Tipo di issue
Funzionalità
Chiarezza
Abbastanza chiara
Stato di attività
Attiva
Stack tecnologico
python, typescript
Ambito
backend-api-design, full-stack

Direzione di ricerca

Read the linked RFC and coordinate with the existing typed-action and simulated-provider owners before choosing an unowned acceptance gap. Start with loopx/chat_action_store.py, loopx/chat_actions.py, loopx/extensions/lark/event_collector.py, and apps/presentation/dashboard/src/data/chat.ts. Done means the accepted scope is integrated across the required entrypoints, with commands and passed, failed, and untested evidence recorded; a merged PR alone is not completion.

Scritto dal modello di indicizzazione a partire dal testo della issue.

Descrizione

direction/architecture-evolution

Outcome / 目标

交付前端与 Lark 一致的人类确认操作。One task tracks this RFC's delivery; keep implementation PRs and milestone evidence here instead of creating a parallel task tree.

Canonical design: RFC. Roadmap: S8/S9, under #4574. Design acceptance is distinct from implementation, live qualification and promotion.

Current boundary

Source audit: main at ce3862e33 (2026-09-28). This is source/PR inspection, not a new test or live-qualification claim.

The RFC separates generic interaction authority, optional domain execution and venue adapters. Existing typed action and operation-card work must be inventoried before adding anything; M1 requires a simulated consumer plus both entrypoints.

Work remaining

  • Complete the generic preview/confirm/execute/reconcile/return lifecycle through the existing typed-action owner and authenticated callback path.
  • Use one optional simulated domain consumer for M1; keep domain reservation/precision/state with that provider. M2/M3 remain separately gated.

Ownership and ongoing work

Coordinate with current generic operation-card and simulated-provider work. Do not open a competing approval/financial ledger. This public task authorizes no trading, payment, account mutation, credential setup or live order; M3 requires the RFC’s exact user authorization.

Contribution route: implementation/integration overlaps active work. Start from the linked current owners/PRs and identify an unowned acceptance gap in a claim comment; do not begin a competing rewrite.

Acceptance

  • The same exact request confirmed from two entrypoints executes once; stale/rejected/expired confirmations cannot execute.
  • Ambiguous submission, restart and duplicate callback recover one outcome and return it to the originating conversation.
  • Packaged frontend, Lark and receipt readback agree; default-off and protected-operation boundaries hold.
  • Reconcile the RFC's current delivery checkpoint and this issue with the integrated revision, commands, passed/failed/untested evidence and remaining gates. Close the accepted scope only; no claim that a merged PR alone completes the RFC.

Starting points and delivery boundary

Base: latest main. Reuse the existing typed owner and provider boundaries. Include affected CLI/frontend/Lark companions; verify real entrypoints and backend where changed. Preserve existing first-screen review and maintainer merge gates. Public artifacts contain only synthetic/public-safe evidence, no private operational state. This task does not authorize provider promotion, benchmark launches, release/deployment or unrelated protected effects.

Lingua principale
Python
Stelle
6.2k
Fork
596
Merge medio
7h 35m
PR unite (30g)
928

Preparare l'ambiente

Come iniziare

  1. Leggi tutta la issue e poi la guida ai contributi del progetto.
  2. Commenta sulla issue per dire che te ne occupi tu — evita che due persone facciano lo stesso lavoro.
  3. Fai un fork del repository e lavora su un branch.
  4. Apri una pull request che faccia riferimento al numero della issue.

Altre issue di loopx-project/loopx

Tutte le issue di loopx-project/loopx

Issue simili

Altre issue su Python

Ricevi le nuove issue nella tua casella

Un breve riepilogo di issue GitHub adatte ai principianti.