Hacktoberfest 2026: los issues que los mantenedores marcaron para octubre, abiertos y aptos para principiantes. Explorar issues de Hacktoberfest

Late-recall regression reports recall instead of recall:late in combined gate

Abierto
  • ¿Algo no está bien?
#1,655 1 comentario 0 reacciones 0 asignados Ver en GitHub

Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día

@santoshkumarradha ya está trabajando en esto.

Desde el 28/9/2026.

  • #1656 de @santoshkumarradha — abierto

Evaluación

Dificultad
4/5
Tiempo estimado
3-5 días
Aptitud para principiantes
58/100
Tipo de issue
Error
Claridad
Bastante claro
Estado de actividad
Activo
Stack tecnológico
go
Área
backend, testing-qa

Línea de trabajo

Start with internal/session/loop_speed_test.go, TestARecallThatLandsAfterTheFirstWordRidesTheNextStep, and its paceCompleter/paceAgent fixture; run the isolated test at the published commit. Trace the production recall/first-word boundary and determine whether the fixture’s ordering is guaranteed or racing. Done means an evidenced before/after cause, preserved assertions, a passing session suite, and a passing combined gate without sleeps or skips.

Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.

Descripción

area:session bug sev:papercut

What happened

The independent combined gate for PR #1632 at 458d1be73b513f2b43afebaa544677ac5353d365 failed one session regression on 2026-09-28:

TestARecallThatLandsAfterTheFirstWordRidesTheNextStep
loop_speed_test.go:421: the decomposition names [recall], want the block written down as late
--- FAIL: TestARecallThatLandsAfterTheFirstWordRidesTheNextStep (0.67s)

The session package failed one of eight shards; the eight interface shards and all seven other affected packages passed. Build, static analysis, manual/change-entry checks and all law checks passed. GitHub CI passed the same commit (run), so this observation must not be described as a deterministic reproduction or dismissed as a passing rerun. The independent gate exited 2.

Replication

No model calls are required. Check out the exact published commit, then run the observed gate:

git checkout 458d1be73b513f2b43afebaa544677ac5353d365
GOMAXPROCS=4 GOFLAGS=-p=2 make pr-ready BASE=b267d390078494f659ade14fe8b31daee255771a

The existing fixture can be selected for investigation with:

GOMAXPROCS=4 GOFLAGS=-p=2 go test -count=1 -timeout 15m ./internal/session -run '^TestARecallThatLandsAfterTheFirstWordRidesTheNextStep$'

Its isolated failure frequency has not yet been measured. The fixture emits the first word, delays its first response by 400ms, and requests recall with a 100ms delay. Determine whether the ordering assumed by the fixture is guaranteed before attributing the failure to scheduling or changing runtime behavior.

Where

internal/session/loop_speed_test.go, TestARecallThatLandsAfterTheFirstWordRidesTheNextStep, the paceCompleter/paceAgent fixture and the production recall/first-word boundary they exercise.

Expected behavior and acceptance

  • Through the real session submission path with its scripted completer, recall that arrives after the first emitted word is recorded as recall:late, does not cut/re-ask that response, and appears in the next request.
  • Preserve all three existing assertions. Use explicit ownership/order synchronization if the fixture is racing; do not merely enlarge sleeps, waive the test or add it to a skip list.
  • Establish a before/after reproduction for the actual cause, then pass the affected session suite and combined gate on the corrected revision.
  • If investigation finds a user-visible runtime defect, verify the corresponding ordinary workflow and update its manual/change entry. No separate live user-facing recall failure has been established yet.

Batch boundary

The owner froze #1632 and requested an honest review handoff with this failing independent gate disclosed. This issue belongs to the next batch; do not add its fix to the frozen #1632 revision.

Lenguaje dominante
Go
Estrellas
115
Forks
14
Merge medio
9 h 3 min
PR fusionados (30 d)
514

Preparar el entorno

Aún no hemos revisado los archivos de configuración de este proyecto. Empieza por su README y consulta nuestra guía para la primera contribución para los pasos generales.

Primeros pasos

  1. Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
  2. Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
  3. Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
  4. Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.

Más de Agent-Field/CodeAF

Todos los issues de Agent-Field/CodeAF

Issues similares

Más issues de Go

Recibe los nuevos issues en tu correo

Un resumen breve de issues de GitHub para principiantes.