Hacktoberfest 2026: die Issues, die Maintainer für den Oktober markiert haben – offen und einsteigerfreundlich. Hacktoberfest-Issues durchsuchen

Late-recall regression reports recall instead of recall:late in combined gate

Offen
  • Stimmt etwas nicht?
#1,655 1 Kommentar 0 Reaktionen 0 zugewiesene Personen Auf GitHub ansehen

Maintainer antworten meist innerhalb von 1 Tag

@santoshkumarradha arbeitet bereits daran.

Seit 28.9.2026.

  • #1656 von @santoshkumarradha — offen

Bewertung

Schwierigkeit
4/5
Geschätzter Aufwand
3-5 Tage
Anfängerfreundlichkeit
58/100
Issue-Typ
Bug
Klarheit
Größtenteils klar
Aktivitätsstatus
Aktiv
Tech-Stack
go
Bereich
backend, testing-qa

Rechercherichtung

Start with internal/session/loop_speed_test.go, TestARecallThatLandsAfterTheFirstWordRidesTheNextStep, and its paceCompleter/paceAgent fixture; run the isolated test at the published commit. Trace the production recall/first-word boundary and determine whether the fixture’s ordering is guaranteed or racing. Done means an evidenced before/after cause, preserved assertions, a passing session suite, and a passing combined gate without sleeps or skips.

Vom Indexierungsmodell aus dem Issue-Text verfasst.

Beschreibung

area:session bug sev:papercut

What happened

The independent combined gate for PR #1632 at 458d1be73b513f2b43afebaa544677ac5353d365 failed one session regression on 2026-09-28:

TestARecallThatLandsAfterTheFirstWordRidesTheNextStep
loop_speed_test.go:421: the decomposition names [recall], want the block written down as late
--- FAIL: TestARecallThatLandsAfterTheFirstWordRidesTheNextStep (0.67s)

The session package failed one of eight shards; the eight interface shards and all seven other affected packages passed. Build, static analysis, manual/change-entry checks and all law checks passed. GitHub CI passed the same commit (run), so this observation must not be described as a deterministic reproduction or dismissed as a passing rerun. The independent gate exited 2.

Replication

No model calls are required. Check out the exact published commit, then run the observed gate:

git checkout 458d1be73b513f2b43afebaa544677ac5353d365
GOMAXPROCS=4 GOFLAGS=-p=2 make pr-ready BASE=b267d390078494f659ade14fe8b31daee255771a

The existing fixture can be selected for investigation with:

GOMAXPROCS=4 GOFLAGS=-p=2 go test -count=1 -timeout 15m ./internal/session -run '^TestARecallThatLandsAfterTheFirstWordRidesTheNextStep$'

Its isolated failure frequency has not yet been measured. The fixture emits the first word, delays its first response by 400ms, and requests recall with a 100ms delay. Determine whether the ordering assumed by the fixture is guaranteed before attributing the failure to scheduling or changing runtime behavior.

Where

internal/session/loop_speed_test.go, TestARecallThatLandsAfterTheFirstWordRidesTheNextStep, the paceCompleter/paceAgent fixture and the production recall/first-word boundary they exercise.

Expected behavior and acceptance

  • Through the real session submission path with its scripted completer, recall that arrives after the first emitted word is recorded as recall:late, does not cut/re-ask that response, and appears in the next request.
  • Preserve all three existing assertions. Use explicit ownership/order synchronization if the fixture is racing; do not merely enlarge sleeps, waive the test or add it to a skip list.
  • Establish a before/after reproduction for the actual cause, then pass the affected session suite and combined gate on the corrected revision.
  • If investigation finds a user-visible runtime defect, verify the corresponding ordinary workflow and update its manual/change entry. No separate live user-facing recall failure has been established yet.

Batch boundary

The owner froze #1632 and requested an honest review handoff with this failing independent gate disclosed. This issue belongs to the next batch; do not add its fix to the frozen #1632 revision.

Vorherrschende Sprache
Go
Sterne
115
Forks
14
Ø Merge
9 Std. 3 Min.
Gemergte PRs (30 T.)
517

Entwicklungsumgebung

Die Einrichtungsdateien dieses Projekts haben wir noch nicht geprüft. Beginnen Sie mit der README; die allgemeinen Schritte stehen in unserem Leitfaden für den ersten Beitrag.

Erste Schritte

  1. Lesen Sie das ganze Issue und danach den Beitragsleitfaden des Projekts.
  2. Schreiben Sie ins Issue, dass Sie es übernehmen — das erspart doppelte Arbeit.
  3. Forken Sie das Repository und arbeiten Sie in einem Branch.
  4. Öffnen Sie einen Pull Request, der die Issue-Nummer nennt.

Mehr aus Agent-Field/CodeAF

Alle Issues in Agent-Field/CodeAF

Ähnliche Issues

Weitere Issues zu Go

Neue Issues direkt in Ihr Postfach

Eine kurze Übersicht über anfängerfreundliche GitHub-Issues.