IdentifyBuiltinColorSpace heuristics failure edgecases: ACEScc, ADX16, CIE-XYZ-D65
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
Nadie ha tomado este issue todavía.
Evaluación
- Dificultad
- 5/5
- Tiempo estimado
- Más de una semana
- Aptitud para principiantes
- 35/100
- Tipo de issue
- Error
- Claridad
- Bastante claro
- Estado de actividad
- Estancado
- Área
- computer-graphics
Línea de trabajo
Comienza ejecutando la reproducción de Python proporcionada contra ocio://studio-config-latest y compara los resultados de IdentifyBuiltinColorSpace entre las distintas flags de optimización y configuraciones de espacios de color inactivos. Después, inspecciona Config::IdentifyBuiltinColorSpace y las rutas de matching de ACEScc, ADX16 y CIE XYZ-D65 BuiltinTransform. La tarea está terminada cuando los espacios de color equivalentes enumerados se identifiquen de forma coherente y se cubra el comportamiento solicitado de visibilidad y optimización.
Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.
Descripción
Apparently, ACEScc, ADX16, and both CIE XYZ-D65 spaces from ocio://studio-config-latest (as of OCIO v2.5.0) are evading our out-of-the-box matching / identification algorithms.
I've been noticing that, very occasionally, Config::IdentifyBuiltinColorSpace has trouble matching certain color spaces among configs that really do share functionally identical definitions, and should, by all accounts, be recognized as equivalent.
I wrote a little function to assess which color spaces in a given config IdentifyBuiltinColorSpace seems to have the most trouble with -- essentially, I'm using the exact same config for both the srcConfig and the builtinConfig, and just collecting the color spaces that can't be found in their own configs.
In exploring this, I found that both optimization flags (unsurprisingly) and color space visibility (surprisingly) affect the rate of success.
Insights:
- It would be useful if there were a way to force Config.IdentifyBuiltinColorSpace to always attempt to failover to searching inactive color spaces.
- It would be nice if IdentifyBuiltinColorSpace exposed an optional optimizationFlags argument as a means of fine-tuning the equivalency "tolerance"
Findings:
- "ADX16" color spaces based off of the
ADX16_to_ACES2065-1BuiltinTransform can be matched when using DRAFT optimization or higher - "ACEScc" and "ACESproxy10i" color spaces based off of the
ACEScc_to_ACES2065-1ACESproxy10i_to_ACES2065-1BuiltinTransform styles respectively remain "unmatchable", regardless of optimization settings.
Here's a python snippet if you wanna mess around:
import PyOpenColorIO as ocio
import os
def get_unmatchable_color_spaces(
config: ocio.Config,
optimization: ocio.OptimizationFlags | int | None = None,
exclude_inactive: bool = False,
verbose: bool = False,
) -> list[str]:
# Optimization Flags affect the identification heuristics. The API doesn't expose a way
# to directly control the optimization flags used for identifying color spaces, but we
# can temporarily adjust the $OCIO_OPTIMIZATION_FLAGS environment variable
# if we want to temporarily override the global optimization behavior
# Preserve the previous environment to restore later.
prev_env = dict(os.environ)
if optimization:
# Temporarily set $OCIO_OPTIMIZATION_FLAGS to the requested value.
os.environ[ocio.OCIO_OPTIMIZATION_FLAGS_ENVVAR] = str(int(optimization))
# Color space visiblity affects the identification heuristics.
# To maximize the likelihood of finding a match, we can temporarily
# activate all color spaces.
# Store the old inactive color spaces to restore later.
old_invisible_color_spaces = config.getInactiveColorSpaces()
if not exclude_inactive:
# Temporarily make all color spaces visible.
config.setInactiveColorSpaces("")
# Iterate over all the color spaces in the config, and collect names of
# color spaces that steadfastly refuse to be matched!
problem_spaces = []
for cs_name in config.getColorSpaceNames(
ocio.SEARCH_REFERENCE_SPACE_ALL,
ocio.COLORSPACE_ALL
):
# Try to match each color space in the config to... itself!
try:
matched_space = ocio.Config.IdentifyBuiltinColorSpace(config, config, cs_name)
except ocio.Exception as e:
if verbose:
ocio.LogMessage(ocio.LOGGING_LEVEL_WARNING, str(e))
problem_spaces.append(cs_name)
# Cleanup -- restore the previous environment and config state.`
os.environ.clear()
os.environ.update(prev_env)
config.setInactiveColorSpaces(old_invisible_color_spaces)
return sorted(problem_spaces)
studio_config_modified = ocio.Config.CreateFromFile("ocio://studio-config-latest")
# Add an ACESproxy10i color space to the studio-config, because I suspect it'll also fail to match itself.
studio_config_modified.addColorSpace(
ocio.ColorSpace(
ocio.REFERENCE_SPACE_SCENE,
name="ACESproxy10i",
toReference= ocio.BuiltinTransform("ACESproxy10i_to_ACES2065-1")
)
)
print(f"""
Unmatchable color spaces: {studio_config_modified.getName()}
---
- Default IdentifyBuiltinColorSpace behavior:
{get_unmatchable_color_spaces(studio_config_modified, exclude_inactive=True)}
- Ignore visibility + no optimizations:
{get_unmatchable_color_spaces(studio_config_modified, optimization=ocio.OPTIMIZATION_NONE)}
- Ignore visibility + draft optimizations:
{get_unmatchable_color_spaces(studio_config_modified, optimization=ocio.OPTIMIZATION_DRAFT)}
""")
Unmatchable color spaces: studio-config-v4.0.0_aces-v2.0_ocio-v2.5
---
- Default IdentifyBuiltinColorSpace behavior:
['ACEScc', 'ACESproxy10i', 'ADX16', 'CIE XYZ-D65 - Display-referred', 'CIE XYZ-D65 - Scene-referred']
- Ignore visibility + no optimizations:
['ACEScc', 'ACESproxy10i', 'ADX16']
- Ignore visibility + draft optimizations:
['ACEScc', 'ACESproxy10i']
- Lenguaje dominante
- C++
- Estrellas
- 2.1k
- Forks
- 502
- Merge medio
- 6 d 3 h
- PR fusionados (30 d)
- 6
Preparar el entorno
- Sin Dockerfile ni archivo de Docker Compose
- Sin plantilla de pull request
- Leer la guía de contribución
Primeros pasos
- Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
- Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
- Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
- Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.
Más de AcademySoftwareFoundation/OpenColorIO
-
Inconsistent run-time library usage for locale handling breaks GPU code generation on some systems.Abierto
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 86/100
AcademySoftwareFoundation/OpenColorIO#2351 · 2 comentarios ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 84/100
AcademySoftwareFoundation/OpenColorIO#2340 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 82/100
AcademySoftwareFoundation/OpenColorIO#2329 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Build failure on GCC/MinGW (MXE): std::ifstream constructor mismatch with Platform::filenameToUTF()Abierto
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 78/100
AcademySoftwareFoundation/OpenColorIO#2283 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
ReadTheDocs - OS DeprecationAbiertoDocumentation
Dificultad 1/5 Menos de una hora Aptitud para principiantes 72/100
AcademySoftwareFoundation/OpenColorIO#2280 · 1 comentario ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
Todos los issues de AcademySoftwareFoundation/OpenColorIO
Issues similares
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 70/100
FriendsofECCE/ECCE#336 · 1 comentario ·
-
Real literal with a 'd' exponent and a kind suffix (1.0d0_4) is accepted; the suffix is ignoredAbiertoerror not reported low priority semantics
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 70/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 66/100
bitcoin-core/gui-qml#1030 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 3 días
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 80/100
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 82/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día