ort only recognizes DLC 1 (3.0) and says Downloadable Content 1+2 (3.0) is required
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Newbie friendliness
- 15/100
- Issue type
- Bug
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Activity status
- Active
- Domain
- content
Research direction
The payload names no source file, test or entry point; the report is a user asking why the port detects only DLC 1 (3.0) when it expects DLC 1+2 (3.0). Start by finding where the DLC presence check and its error message are produced, and compare the expected pack identifiers with the files the reporter has. Done means the reporter's setup is either explained by the docs or the detection accepts the second pack, and the maintainers have confirmed which. Work is still a support thread with no assignee.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
The idea
Hi everyone,
I am opening this because I need some help with the DLC configuration. I already have the DLC files, but the port is not recognizing them properly. It shows an error message stating that I need to have Downloadable Content 1+2 (3.0) installed, but it is currently only detecting DLC 1 (3.0).
I have tried renaming the files and folders, and I also checked a few settings, but I cannot get it to work or recognize the second pack.
Could anyone please point out what I might be doing wrong or if there is a specific step or file structure that I am missing?
Thank you very much in advance for your time and help!
Anything else
No response
- Dominant language
- C
- Stars
- 811
- Forks
- 37
- Avg merge
- 17m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 13
Getting set up
- No Dockerfile or Docker Compose file
- No pull request template
- Read the contributing guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from Revivedx/SavageWindRecomp
-
Surround soundOpenenhancement
Difficulty 5/5 Over a week Newbie friendliness 35/100
Revivedx/SavageWindRecomp#573 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
bug
Difficulty 4/5 3-5 days Newbie friendliness 43/100
Revivedx/SavageWindRecomp#570 · 1 comment ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
bug
Difficulty 4/5 3-5 days Newbie friendliness 42/100
Revivedx/SavageWindRecomp#569 · 1 comment · 2 reactions ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
bug
Difficulty 4/5 3-5 days Newbie friendliness 48/100
Revivedx/SavageWindRecomp#568 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
Fatal:svcBreakOpenbug
Difficulty 4/5 3-5 days Newbie friendliness 25/100
Revivedx/SavageWindRecomp#567 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
All issues in Revivedx/SavageWindRecomp
Similar issues
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 68/100
-
要トリアージ 辞書
Difficulty 1/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 86/100
yksr-melt/Meltype#1625 · 1 reaction ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
kind/bug priority/medium qa_automation
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 78/100
yugabyte/yugabyte-db#37324 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 65/100
tree-sitter/tree-sitter#6111 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
bug
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 76/100
joncampbell123/dosbox-x#6797 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day