Feedback request on your jsonrepair-rs tool-call fork
Maintainers usually reply within 8 days
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100
Research direction
Start with the tool-call JSON repair README and the documented local fork of jsonrepair-rs 0.2.1. Provide a fabricated minimal input and expected output for omitted opening quotes, then document other divergent malformed streamed arguments and whether preserving comment markers would cover the fork's requirements. No source file or test entry point is identified.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
Hi, I'm the maintainer of jsonrepair-rs. I read your tool-call JSON repair README and saw that your local fork of 0.2.1 keeps #, //, and /* ... */ as content when a model omits an opening quote. That is a useful, concrete gap in the upstream default policy.
I'm looking for real requirements before designing an upstream option. Could you share a synthetic minimal input and expected output for that case, plus any other malformed streamed tool arguments your fork handles differently? I would also appreciate knowing whether an explicit option that preserves comment markers in tool-call arguments would let you use upstream, or whether other behavior or performance constraints require the fork.
Please avoid posting real user/tool payloads or credentials. A small fabricated reproducer is enough. Thanks for documenting the fork so clearly.
- Dominant language
- Rust
- Stars
- 2.3k
- Forks
- 236
- Avg merge
- 2h 32m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 524
Getting set up
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from GCWing/OpenBitFun
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 75/100
GCWing/OpenBitFun#3213 · 1 comment ·
Maintainers usually reply within 8 days
-
bug
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 72/100
GCWing/OpenBitFun#2363 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 8 days
-
question
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 78/100
GCWing/OpenBitFun#2340 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 8 days
-
Difficulty 5/5 Over a week Newbie friendliness 42/100
GCWing/OpenBitFun#3233 · 1 comment ·
Maintainers usually reply within 8 days
-
Difficulty 4/5 3-5 days Newbie friendliness 52/100
GCWing/OpenBitFun#3231 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 8 days
All issues in GCWing/OpenBitFun
Similar issues
-
`categorize_command` has no `uv` arm, so every `rtk uv …` row counts as `other` in the ecosystem mixOpenarea:api bug good first issue priority:low
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 92/100
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 92/100
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
area/cli kind/bug
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 90/100
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
enhancement
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 72/100
-
good first issue open-endedness: low type: new feature
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 72/100