Hacktoberfest 2026:维护者为十月标记出来的 issue,仍然开放、适合新手。 浏览 Hacktoberfest issue

Feedback request on your jsonrepair-rs tool-call fork

未关闭
#3,229 0 条评论 0 个 reaction 已指派 0 人 在 GitHub 查看

维护者通常 8 天内回复

还没有人认领这个 Issue。

评估

难度
5/5
预计耗时
一周以上
新手友好度
25/100
Issue 类型
功能
描述清晰度
需要澄清
活跃度
活跃
技术栈
rust
领域
tooling

调研方向

Start with the tool-call JSON repair README and the documented local fork of jsonrepair-rs 0.2.1. Provide a fabricated minimal input and expected output for omitted opening quotes, then document other divergent malformed streamed arguments and whether preserving comment markers would cover the fork's requirements. No source file or test entry point is identified.

由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。

描述

Hi, I'm the maintainer of jsonrepair-rs. I read your tool-call JSON repair README and saw that your local fork of 0.2.1 keeps #, //, and /* ... */ as content when a model omits an opening quote. That is a useful, concrete gap in the upstream default policy.

I'm looking for real requirements before designing an upstream option. Could you share a synthetic minimal input and expected output for that case, plus any other malformed streamed tool arguments your fork handles differently? I would also appreciate knowing whether an explicit option that preserves comment markers in tool-call arguments would let you use upstream, or whether other behavior or performance constraints require the fork.

Please avoid posting real user/tool payloads or credentials. A small fabricated reproducer is enough. Thanks for documenting the fork so clearly.

主要语言
Rust
星标
2.3k
派生
236
平均合并
2 小时 31 分钟
30 天内合并 PR
553

环境准备

从这里开始

  1. 先读完整个 Issue,再读项目的贡献指南。
  2. 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
  3. Fork 仓库,在一个分支上完成修改。
  4. 提交 Pull Request,并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。

GCWing/OpenBitFun 的其他 Issue

查看 GCWing/OpenBitFun 的全部 Issue

相似的 Issue

更多 Rust Issue

把新 issue 发到你的邮箱

精选适合新手参与的 GitHub issue 摘要。