Discrepancy between spec and tests on indexing TypedDicts with unknown literal keys
还没有人认领这个 Issue。
评估
- 难度
- 4/5
- 预计耗时
- 3-5 天
- 新手友好度
- 35/100
- Issue 类型
- 缺陷
- 描述清晰度
- 基本清楚
- 活跃度
- 停滞
- 技术栈
- python
- 领域
- documentation, testing
调研方向
将引用的规范要求与 conformance/tests/typeddicts_operations.py 进行比较，然后查看链接的讨论和相关 PR，以了解类型检查器行为的差异。确定应修改一致性测试还是规范；完成的标准是消除歧义，并使规范与测试保持一致。
由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。
描述
Splitting issue from PR https://github.com/python/typing/pull/1978
Spec says that indexing with unknown literal keys should be reported as an error:
The use of a key that is not known to exist should be reported as an error, even if this wouldn’t necessarily generate a runtime type error. These are often mistakes, and these may insert values with an invalid type if structural assignability hides the types of certain items. For example, d[‘x’] = 1 should generate a type check error if ‘x’ is not a valid key for d (which is assumed to be a TypedDict type).
But it's not reflected in conformance tests (https://github.com/python/typing/blob/2d88da2a407b556f5b52b4c6ad1bd659873bb9ac/conformance/tests/typeddicts_operations.py) and there's a bit of discrepancy between type checkers how they handle some cases (most of them reject all cases that may cause runtime error / allow cases that do not cause runtime error ).
Would be great if we can either adapt conformance tests to the spec or amend the spec to remove the ambiguity.
Related discussion - https://discuss.python.org/t/typeddict-operations-with-unknown-literal-keys/89653 (also has information on state of this issue in different type checkers).
- 主要语言
- Python
- 星标
- 1.8k
- 派生
- 302
- 平均合并
- 23 小时
- 30 天内合并 PR
- 8
贡献指南
这个仓库没有索引到贡献指南
从这里开始
- 先读完整个 Issue，再读项目的贡献指南。
- 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
- Fork 仓库，在一个分支上完成修改。
- 提交 Pull Request，并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。
python/typing 的其他 Issue
-
topic: typing spec
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 72/100
-
topic: typing spec
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 75/100
-
topic: documentation
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 76/100
-
topic: documentation
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 65/100
-
topic: conformance tests topic: typing spec
难度 3/5 1-2 天 新手友好度 72/100
相似的 Issue
-
enhancement
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 70/100
canonical/paas-charm#368 · 1 条评论 ·
-
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 75/100
-
tech debt
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 75/100
-
难度 1/5 1 小时以内 新手友好度 90/100
StevenBlack/hosts#3256 ·
-
难度 1/5 1 小时以内 新手友好度 90/100
qualcomm/qai-appbuilder#275 ·