Hacktoberfest 2026:维护者为十月标记出来的 issue,仍然开放、适合新手。 浏览 Hacktoberfest issue

Infra: Make `Discussion-To` optional in source, display from latest `Post-History` during build

未关闭
#5,158 0 条评论 3 个 reaction 已指派 0 人 在 GitHub 查看

维护者通常 1 天内回复

还没有人认领这个 Issue。

评估

难度
3/5
预计耗时
1-2 天
新手友好度
55/100
Issue 类型
功能
描述清晰度
基本清楚
活跃度
活跃

调研方向

Start by locating the PEP source metadata validation and the build path that renders Discussion-To into HTML. Confirm how Post-History links are parsed, then verify that missing Discussion-To uses the latest Post-History link while existing Discussion-To values remain unchanged.

由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。

描述

infra

PEPs process streamlining thought:

  • Discussion-To is a URL
  • Post-History is a list of URLs and dates

Currently both are required, but authors often forget to add one.

Do we need really them both in the PEP source?

We could make Discussion-To optional, and if it's missing, take the last Post-History link and set that as Discussion-To in the rendered HTML.

No changes needed for the existing PEPs that already have Discussion-To.

主要语言
reStructuredText
星标
5k
派生
1.8k
平均合并
1 天 15 小时
30 天内合并 PR
34

环境准备

从这里开始

  1. 先读完整个 Issue,再读项目的贡献指南。
  2. 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
  3. Fork 仓库,在一个分支上完成修改。
  4. 提交 Pull Request,并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。

python/peps 的其他 Issue

查看 python/peps 的全部 Issue

相似的 Issue

更多 Build System Issue

把新 issue 发到你的邮箱

精选适合新手参与的 GitHub issue 摘要。