Impossible to create an instance of the Costrong class

未关闭
#46 0 条评论 0 个 reaction 已指派 0 人 在 GitHub 查看

还没有人认领这个 Issue。

评估

难度
5/5
预计耗时
一周以上
新手友好度
25/100
Issue 类型
功能
描述清晰度
基本清楚
活跃度
停滞
领域
backend

调研方向

Start by reading the Costrong class and its unfirst method; the issue gives no file or test paths, so locate them in the repository. Compare the strict definition with the proposed Lazy constraint and consider the naming or library scope raised in the issue. Done means establishing whether the proposed approach is viable and agreeing on the API direction.

由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。

描述

The reason that Function and other types cannot be an instance of Costrong is that PureScript is a strict evaluation.

unfirst :: forall a b c. p (Tuple a c) (Tuple b c) -> p a b

That is, when we want to loop over c, it is impossible to set the initial value of c

How to modify it may be debatable, but I found the following solution

unfirstLazy :: forall a b c. Lazy c => p (Tuple a c) (Tuple b c) -> p a b
unfirstLazy f a = fst $ f $ Tuple a $ go
  where
  go = snd $ f $ Tuple a $ defer \_ -> go

Also, since this is not "Co" Strong, it might be better to name the class differently, for example CostrongLazy, or create a new library.

Thanks to natefaubion for sharing this issue on PureScript discord server.

主要语言
PureScript
星标
34
派生
13
平均合并
3 天 10 分钟
30 天内合并 PR
1

环境准备

  • 没有 Dockerfile 或 Docker Compose 文件
  • 有 Pull Request 模板
  • 没有贡献指南

从这里开始

  1. 先读完整个 Issue,再读项目的贡献指南。
  2. 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
  3. Fork 仓库,在一个分支上完成修改。
  4. 提交 Pull Request,并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。

purescript/purescript-profunctor 的其他 Issue

查看 purescript/purescript-profunctor 的全部 Issue

相似的 Issue

更多 Backend & API Design Issue

把新 issue 发到你的邮箱

精选适合新手参与的 GitHub issue 摘要。