Impossible to create an instance of the Costrong class

未關閉
#46 0 則留言 0 個 reaction 已指派 0 人 在 GitHub 檢視

還沒有人認領這個 Issue。

評估

難度
5/5
預估耗時
一週以上
新手友好度
25/100
Issue 類型
功能
描述清晰度
基本清楚
活躍度
停滯
領域
backend

研究方向

Start by reading the Costrong class and its unfirst method; the issue gives no file or test paths, so locate them in the repository. Compare the strict definition with the proposed Lazy constraint and consider the naming or library scope raised in the issue. Done means establishing whether the proposed approach is viable and agreeing on the API direction.

由索引模型根據 Issue 內容生成。

描述

The reason that Function and other types cannot be an instance of Costrong is that PureScript is a strict evaluation.

unfirst :: forall a b c. p (Tuple a c) (Tuple b c) -> p a b

That is, when we want to loop over c, it is impossible to set the initial value of c

How to modify it may be debatable, but I found the following solution

unfirstLazy :: forall a b c. Lazy c => p (Tuple a c) (Tuple b c) -> p a b
unfirstLazy f a = fst $ f $ Tuple a $ go
  where
  go = snd $ f $ Tuple a $ defer \_ -> go

Also, since this is not "Co" Strong, it might be better to name the class differently, for example CostrongLazy, or create a new library.

Thanks to natefaubion for sharing this issue on PureScript discord server.

主要語言
PureScript
星號
34
分支
13
平均合併
3 天 10 分鐘
30 天內合併 PR
1

環境準備

  • 沒有 Dockerfile 或 Docker Compose 檔案
  • 有 Pull Request 範本
  • 沒有貢獻指南

從這裡開始

  1. 先讀完整個 Issue,再讀專案的貢獻指南。
  2. 在 Issue 下留言說明你要接手 —— 這能避免兩個人做同樣的事。
  3. Fork 儲存庫,在一個分支上完成修改。
  4. 送出 Pull Request,並在描述裡引用這個 Issue 編號。

purescript/purescript-profunctor 的其他 Issue

查看 purescript/purescript-profunctor 的全部 Issue

相似的 Issue

更多 Backend & API Design Issue

把新 issue 寄到你的電子郵件信箱

精選適合新手參與的 GitHub issue 摘要。