Hacktoberfest 2026:维护者为十月标记出来的 issue,仍然开放、适合新手。 浏览 Hacktoberfest issue

Tool validation errors echo the rejected input value (input_value) — add a masking option or a public validation-error hook

未关闭
#3,572 1 条评论 0 个 reaction 已指派 0 人 在 GitHub 查看

还没有人认领这个 Issue。

评估

难度
3/5
预计耗时
1-2 天
新手友好度
65/100
Issue 类型
功能
描述清晰度
描述清楚
活跃度
活跃
技术栈
python

调研方向

Look at the Tool.run method and how it wraps pydantic ValidationError into ToolError. The error message is built from str(ValidationError). Find where tool validation happens, likely in the tool manager or argument model. The goal is to add a masking option or a hook to customize the error message without leaking input_value. Check existing server configuration for similar flags. A successful change will produce a validation error that describes the rule but not the sensitive data.

由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。

描述

What happens

When a tool call's arguments fail pydantic validation, Tool.run wraps the ValidationError into a ToolError whose message includes the pydantic rendering — and str(ValidationError) carries the offending value:

Error executing tool <name>: 1 validation error for <model>
<field>
  Input should be a valid string [type=string_type, input_value=12345, input_type=int]

That message is sent to the client as an isError result, so the rejected value is echoed back to the caller (and into the model's context).

Why it matters

Servers that handle sensitive input (PII/PHI, credentials, member identifiers) must not let a validation failure repeat the value; the error should describe the rule, not the data. We hit this building a healthcare-platform MCP server whose tool inputs can be PHI.

Workaround we use today (reaches private API)

We replace the SDK-generated arguments model with a subclass that raises MCPError(-32602, "<field>: <rule>") instead of the default ToolError:

tool = server._tool_manager.add_tool(fn, ...)
tool.fn_metadata.arg_model = PhiSafeArgModel(tool.fn_metadata.arg_model)

This depends on _tool_manager and fn_metadata.arg_model (both private) and on validation continuing to flow through model_validate, so it is fragile across minor releases.

Asks (any one would remove the private-API dependency)
  1. An opt-in setting to omit input values from tool validation errors (e.g. a mask_error_details-style flag), or
  2. A public/supported hook to customize argument-validation failures (or documenting arg_model as an extensible point), or
  3. Excluding input_value from the argument-validation error text by default.

Version: mcp 2.2.0 (Python). Happy to open a PR if you can point at the preferred shape.

主要语言
Python
星标
24.3k
派生
4k
平均合并
1 天 16 小时
30 天内合并 PR
25

贡献指南

打开贡献指南

从这里开始

  1. 先读完整个 Issue,再读项目的贡献指南。
  2. 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
  3. Fork 仓库,在一个分支上完成修改。
  4. 提交 Pull Request,并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。

modelcontextprotocol/python-sdk 的其他 Issue

查看 modelcontextprotocol/python-sdk 的全部 Issue

相似的 Issue

更多 Python Issue

把新 issue 发到你的邮箱

精选适合新手参与的 GitHub issue 摘要。