Audit upstream Firecrawl and Playwright skills against our skill-quality bar
维护者通常 1 天内回复
还没有人认领这个 Issue。
评估
- 难度
- 3/5
- 预计耗时
- 1-2 天
- 新手友好度
- 52/100
- Issue 类型
- 文档
- 描述清晰度
- 描述清楚
- 活跃度
- 活跃
- 技术栈
- playwright, shell
调研方向
Start from the vendored wrappers at plugins/firecrawl/skills/firecrawl and plugins/playwright/skills/playwright and compare them to current upstream Firecrawl and Playwright skills using /plugin-quality:audit or plugin-dev:skill-reviewer. Record a switch-or-keep verdict per skill with upstream version, date, evidence, and a recheck trigger if keeping. Do not remove wrappers in this issue.
由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。
描述
Problem
We ship our own wrappers of the Firecrawl and Playwright CLI skills (plugins/firecrawl/skills/firecrawl, plugins/playwright/skills/playwright) because the upstream skills did not meet our skill-quality bar: progressive disclosure and best-practice frontmatter. Nothing tells us when upstream catches up, so the vendored copies can drift or carry sync friction past the point they earn their keep.
Proposed
Audit the current upstream Firecrawl and Playwright skills against the same bar our own skills meet (for example with /plugin-quality:audit or plugin-dev:skill-reviewer), and record the result per skill:
- Upstream passes: plan the switch to the upstream skill and the removal of our wrapper, as its own change.
- Upstream fails: keep vendoring, and list the gaps with the upstream version checked, an as-of date and a recheck trigger.
Acceptance
- Each skill has a recorded verdict (switch or keep) with the upstream version and the evidence.
- No wrapper is removed in this issue; removal, if warranted, is a follow-up.
- 主要语言
- Shell
- 星标
- 22
- 派生
- 2
- 平均合并
- 6 小时 58 分钟
- 30 天内合并 PR
- 951
环境准备
- 没有 Dockerfile 或 Docker Compose 文件
- 没有 Pull Request 模板
- 阅读贡献指南
从这里开始
- 先读完整个 Issue，再读项目的贡献指南。
- 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
- Fork 仓库，在一个分支上完成修改。
- 提交 Pull Request，并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。
melodic-software/claude-code-plugins 的其他 Issue
-
priority: medium status: needs-decision work-class: scoped
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 78/100
melodic-software/claude-code-plugins#9339 · 2 条评论 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
pipeline-canary priority: low status: ready work-class: mechanical
难度 1/5 1 小时以内 新手友好度 88/100
melodic-software/claude-code-plugins#9263 · 1 条评论 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
good first issue priority: low
难度 1/5 1 小时以内 新手友好度 90/100
melodic-software/claude-code-plugins#9251 · 1 条评论 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
area: security needs-triage priority: low
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 79/100
melodic-software/claude-code-plugins#9211 · 1 条评论 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
priority: low
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 68/100
melodic-software/claude-code-plugins#9202 · 1 条评论 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
查看 melodic-software/claude-code-plugins 的全部 Issue
相似的 Issue
-
source:reader type:enhancement
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 72/100
stephrobert/blog-roadmap#115 ·
-
Python Volcengine provider returns failures instead of raising them可能已有人在做 @Ricardo-M-L 今天认领。 未关闭
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 79/100
agent-infra/sandbox#248 ·
-
chore priority:low size:S
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 74/100
celo-org/celopedia-skills#98 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
Git for Windows shouldn't be locked on their `.windows.1` versions可能已有人在做 关联的 PR 仍在进行中或已合并。 未关闭git windows
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 78/100
jenkins-infra/packer-images#3179 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
ready-for-pr
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 72/100
kunchenguid/firstmate#7679 · 1 条评论 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复