[curriculum-eval] side-quest-17-07-repo-poisoning.md: cognitive_load — 1234 words, concept overload, low activity density
维护者通常 1 天内回复
还没有人认领这个 Issue。
评估
- 难度
- 2/5
- 预计耗时
- 1-3 小时
- 新手友好度
- 76/100
- Issue 类型
- 文档
- 描述清晰度
- 描述清楚
- 活跃度
- 活跃
- 技术栈
- markdown
调研方向
阅读 workshop/side-quest-17-07-repo-poisoning.md 和仓库中关于有效 gh-aw 文档链接的 AGENTS.md 指引。精简“How AW Defends Against It”部分，将“Spot the Dangerous Frontmatter”移到“The Attack”之后，并保留先决条件、“Harden Your Workflow”练习以及包含至少四个可验证项目的检查点。最终内容不超过900词，并运行指定的 markdownlint 命令。
由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。
描述
File: workshop/side-quest-17-07-repo-poisoning.md
Overall Score: 4.95 / 10.0 (corpus mean: 6.06; checkpoint score is a false 0 from a detector bug — the page has a ## :white_check_mark: Checkpoint at line 191)
Flagged Dimensions:
| Dimension | Score | Benchmark | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|
| cognitive_load | 5.8 | ≤ 800 words, ≤ 15 concepts (actual 1234 words) | −4.2 |
| active_learning | 2.7 | density ≥ 3 | −7.3 |
| scaffolding | 5.0 | Before You Start/Prerequisites | −5.0 |
Root Cause (≤ 2 sentences):
The page packs the attack, impact, a long "How AW Defends Against It" section (lines 45–125), two exercises, and author guidance into one page, ~430 words over budget. Learners reach the exercises (line 125 onward) only after ~80 lines of prose.
Evidence (quoted from the file):
An agent granted
contents: writecan be tricked into committing backdoors or overwriting sensitive files — keeping the workflow read-only, and routing any genuine writes through a pull request, closes that door entirely.
Learning Science Rationale:
Cognitive Load Theory and the worked-example effect suggest interleaving short explanations with immediate practice rather than a long expository block before exercises. Moving a brief "spot the danger" exercise earlier reduces extraneous load and raises activity density.
Improvement Prompt (for an agent):
Edit workshop/side-quest-17-07-repo-poisoning.md to reach ≤ 900 words. Condense "How AW Defends Against It" into a short table of defence → what it blocks, move the "Spot the Dangerous Frontmatter" exercise directly after "The Attack", and keep the "Harden Your Workflow" exercise and the existing "## :white_check_mark: Checkpoint" (≥ 4 verifiable items). Ensure a "Before You Start" prerequisites section remains. Do not number headings; ≤ 3 callouts; keep gh-aw doc links valid per AGENTS.md. Run `npx --yes markdownlint-cli2 "**/*.md"`.
Expected Score After Fix: 6.8 / 10.0
Generated by 🔬 Curriculum Quality Evaluator · copilot · auto · ~47 AIC · ⌖ ~1 AIC · ⊞ 5K · ◷
- expires on Nov 12, 2026, 3:32 AM UTC
- 主要语言
- JavaScript
- 星标
- 58
- 派生
- 40
- 平均合并
- 1 天 22 小时
- 30 天内合并 PR
- 7
环境准备
在浏览器里用你自己的 GitHub 账号启动这个项目的开发容器。
- 没有 Dockerfile 或 Docker Compose 文件
- 没有 Pull Request 模板
- 没有贡献指南
从这里开始
- 先读完整个 Issue，再读项目的贡献指南。
- 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
- Fork 仓库，在一个分支上完成修改。
- 提交 Pull Request，并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。
githubnext/gh-aw-workshop 的其他 Issue
-
[workshop-sim] Repair: Make Copilot access and billing path decision self-contained in Steps 07/07d未关闭feedback simulation workshop
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 72/100
githubnext/gh-aw-workshop#5597 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
feedback simulation workshop
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 78/100
githubnext/gh-aw-workshop#5595 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
curriculum documentation quality
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 84/100
githubnext/gh-aw-workshop#5582 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
[curriculum-eval] 04-github-actions-intro.md: cognitive_load — 28 new concepts in a 766-word step未关闭curriculum documentation quality
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 74/100
githubnext/gh-aw-workshop#5579 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 79/100
githubnext/gh-aw-workshop#5577 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
查看 githubnext/gh-aw-workshop 的全部 Issue
相似的 Issue
-
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 75/100
swc-project/swc-ai-issues#414 ·
-
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 84/100
swagger-api/swagger-client#4318 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
check:passed feeds:add
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 68/100
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
Disabled radio toggle button groups lose checked state可能已有人在做 @vladosskins178 今天认领。 未关闭bug confirmed css has-pr v6
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 72/100
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 62/100
维护者通常 1 天内回复