[curriculum-eval] 04-github-actions-intro.md: cognitive_load — 28 new concepts in a 766-word step
维护者通常 1 天内回复
还没有人认领这个 Issue。
评估
- 难度
- 2/5
- 预计耗时
- 1-3 小时
- 新手友好度
- 74/100
- Issue 类型
- 文档
- 描述清晰度
- 描述清楚
- 活跃度
- 活跃
- 技术栈
- github-actions, markdown
调研方向
阅读 workshop/04-github-actions-intro.md，重点关注“Quick Refresher”和“Label a sample workflow”两个部分。首先检查练习要求掌握哪些术语，以及现有材料如何介绍这些术语。完成标准是：将复习内容精简到所需概念，在概念组之间添加简短的活动，并保留指定的部分和风格；运行 issue 中的 markdownlint 命令。
由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。
描述
File: workshop/04-github-actions-intro.md
Overall Score: 5.4 / 10.0 (corpus mean: 6.1)
Flagged Dimensions:
| Dimension | Score | Benchmark | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|
| cognitive_load | 6.8 | ≥ 9 (≤ 15 concepts) | −2.2 (28 concepts) |
| active_learning | 3.9 | 10 (density ≥ 3) | −6.1 |
| checkpoint_quality | 0.0 (scorer false negative; heading at line 138) | 10 | n/a |
Root Cause (≤ 2 sentences):
The "Quick Refresher" introduces roughly 28 Actions terms (workflow, job, step, runner, trigger, permissions, secrets, etc.) in one pass, nearly double the 15-concept ceiling. Hands-on activity only starts at "Label a sample workflow", after most of the vocabulary has been presented.
Evidence (quoted from the file):
Quick Refresher (line 26; followed by "Why This Matters for Agentic Workflows" at line 70 and "Label a sample workflow" at line 83)
Learning Science Rationale:
Miller/Cowan working-memory limits and Sweller's Cognitive Load Theory show that introducing many new terms before practice overloads intrinsic load. Mayer's pre-training principle suggests presenting only the few key terms needed first, then letting learners apply them in the labelling exercise and meeting the remaining terms in context.
Improvement Prompt (for an agent):
Edit workshop/04-github-actions-intro.md. Cut the Quick Refresher to the ≤ 12 terms needed for the "Label a sample workflow" exercise (workflow, trigger, job, step, runner, permissions, secret, etc.), moving the rest to a link to the official docs or a <details> block. Interleave a short action (a code block or checklist item) after each remaining concept group so activity density rises toward 3. Keep the ":clipboard: Before You Start" and "## :white_check_mark: Checkpoint" sections (≥ 4 items), second-person tone, no numbered headings. Run `npx --yes markdownlint-cli2 "workshop/04-github-actions-intro.md"`.
Expected Score After Fix: 7.8 / 10.0 (with the rubric regex fix; ~6.0 with current scorer)
Generated by 🔬 Curriculum Quality Evaluator · copilot · auto · ~39 AIC · ⌖ ~1 AIC · ⊞ 5K · ◷
- expires on Nov 12, 2026, 3:03 AM UTC
- 主要语言
- JavaScript
- 星标
- 58
- 派生
- 40
- 平均合并
- 1 天 22 小时
- 30 天内合并 PR
- 7
环境准备
在浏览器里用你自己的 GitHub 账号启动这个项目的开发容器。
- 没有 Dockerfile 或 Docker Compose 文件
- 没有 Pull Request 模板
- 没有贡献指南
从这里开始
- 先读完整个 Issue，再读项目的贡献指南。
- 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
- Fork 仓库，在一个分支上完成修改。
- 提交 Pull Request，并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。
githubnext/gh-aw-workshop 的其他 Issue
-
[workshop-sim] Repair: Make Copilot access and billing path decision self-contained in Steps 07/07d未关闭feedback simulation workshop
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 72/100
githubnext/gh-aw-workshop#5597 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
feedback simulation workshop
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 78/100
githubnext/gh-aw-workshop#5595 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
curriculum documentation quality
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 76/100
githubnext/gh-aw-workshop#5583 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
curriculum documentation quality
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 84/100
githubnext/gh-aw-workshop#5582 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 79/100
githubnext/gh-aw-workshop#5577 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
查看 githubnext/gh-aw-workshop 的全部 Issue
相似的 Issue
-
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 75/100
swc-project/swc-ai-issues#414 ·
-
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 84/100
swagger-api/swagger-client#4318 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
check:passed feeds:add
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 68/100
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
Disabled radio toggle button groups lose checked state可能已有人在做 @vladosskins178 今天认领。 未关闭bug confirmed css has-pr v6
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 72/100
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 62/100
维护者通常 1 天内回复