[curriculum-eval] curriculum_assessment.py: checkpoint_quality/scaffolding — rubric regex misses `:white_check_mark:` and `:clipboard:` headings
维护者通常 1 天内回复
还没有人认领这个 Issue。
评估
- 难度
- 2/5
- 预计耗时
- 1-3 小时
- 新手友好度
- 75/100
- Issue 类型
- 缺陷
- 描述清晰度
- 描述清楚
- 活跃度
- 活跃
- 技术栈
- javascript, python
调研方向
从.github/skills/curriculum-quantitative-assessment/curriculum_assessment.py开始，检查CHECKPOINT_RE和has_prereq_section的正则表达式。为 issue 中提到的带 emoji 和 shortcode 的标题形式添加单元测试，然后重新运行评估。完成标准是 checkpoint 覆盖率约为 86/93，且大多数页面的 scaffolding 分数接近 10，同时不编辑 workshop 文件。
由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。
描述
File: workshop/(all lessons; rubric at .github/skills/curriculum-quantitative-assessment/curriculum_assessment.py)
Overall Score: 6.09 / 10.0 (corpus mean: 6.09)
Flagged Dimensions:
| Dimension | Score | Benchmark | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|
| checkpoint_quality | 0.0 for 90/93 files | ≥ 10 (≥ 4 items) | −10.0 |
| scaffolding | 5.0 for 93/93 files | 10 | −5.0 |
Root Cause (≤ 2 sentences):
CHECKPOINT_RE matches only ## ✅ Checkpoint and the prerequisites check only ## 📋 Before You Start, but the workshop uses ## :white_check_mark: Checkpoint and ## :clipboard: Before You Start (e.g. 86 of 93 files have a checkpoint). The scorer therefore reports false zeros, which also explains the −2.00 drops for side-quest-11-09-agent-session-phases.md and side-quest-12-01-iterate-agent-output.md.
Evidence (quoted from the file):
✅ Checkpoint (workshop/side-quest-11-06-anthropic-key.md, line 109) — scored
has_checkpoint: false
Learning Science Rationale:
Valid measurement is a precondition for any improvement loop: Bloom-aligned assessment and cognitive-load tuning require instruments that reflect the content. A rubric with systematic false negatives misdirects effort and hides the real, smaller gaps (7 files truly lack checkpoints, Mayer's signalling principle for learners relies on them).
Improvement Prompt (for an agent):
In .github/skills/curriculum-quantitative-assessment/curriculum_assessment.py, update CHECKPOINT_RE to match `## ✅ Checkpoint` and `## :white_check_mark: Checkpoint`, and update the has_prereq_section regexes to match `## 📋 Before You Start` and `## :clipboard: Before You Start` as well as `## Prerequisites`. Add unit tests for each heading form, rerun the assessment, and confirm checkpoint coverage reports ~86/93 and scaffolding ~10 for most pages. Do not edit workshop files.
Expected Score After Fix: ≈ 8.2 corpus mean / 10.0
Generated by 🔬 Curriculum Quality Evaluator · copilot · auto · 32.3 AIC · ⌖ 0.79 AIC · ⊞ 10.5K · ◷
- expires on Oct 20, 2026, 2:48 AM UTC
- 主要语言
- JavaScript
- 星标
- 53
- 派生
- 35
- 平均合并
- 1 天 6 小时
- 30 天内合并 PR
- 15
环境准备
在浏览器里用你自己的 GitHub 账号启动这个项目的开发容器。
- 没有 Dockerfile 或 Docker Compose 文件
- 没有 Pull Request 模板
- 没有贡献指南
从这里开始
- 先读完整个 Issue，再读项目的贡献指南。
- 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
- Fork 仓库，在一个分支上完成修改。
- 提交 Pull Request，并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。
githubnext/gh-aw-workshop 的其他 Issue
-
broken-image
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 65/100
githubnext/gh-aw-workshop#4787 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
curriculum documentation quality
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 78/100
githubnext/gh-aw-workshop#4786 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
[curriculum-eval] side-quest-17-07-repo-poisoning.md: cognitive_load — 23 new concepts in 1234 words未关闭curriculum documentation quality
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 74/100
githubnext/gh-aw-workshop#4784 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
curriculum documentation quality
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 78/100
githubnext/gh-aw-workshop#4785 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
curriculum documentation quality
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 68/100
githubnext/gh-aw-workshop#4782 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
查看 githubnext/gh-aw-workshop 的全部 Issue
相似的 Issue
-
难度 1/5 1 小时以内 新手友好度 83/100
module-federation/core#5205 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
affects:v0.5.2 area:frontend audit:ui-ux-2026-10 bug priority:P2
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 82/100
berntpopp/kidney-genetics-db#326 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
task
难度 1/5 1 小时以内 新手友好度 83/100
TAMULib/fw-registry#550 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 79/100
-
NWCWalletService.subscribe: response is never published if the handler finishes after unsubscribe (regression in 8.1.0)可能已有人在做 @ajaysehwal 今天认领。 未关闭
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 83/100