False Negative: CloseWriter.ql misses leaked wrapped streams when the close is skipped by an early return or hidden in a factory.
还没有人认领这个 Issue。
评估
调研方向
首先阅读 Likely Bugs/Resource Leaks/CloseWriter.ql,并检查 PosCase2_Var3.java 和 PosCase2_Var5.java 中受影响的用例。跟踪查询如何处理提前返回和由 helper 创建的流,然后运行相关的 CloseWriter 测试。完成的标准是两个用例都被报告为泄漏,且不破坏现有覆盖率。
由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。
描述
Version
codeql 2.24.3
Checker
- Checker id:
Likely Bugs/Resource Leaks/CloseWriter.ql - Checker description: This checker detects instances where a Writer or OutputStream is created but not guaranteed to be closed on method exit, potentially causing resource leaks.
Description of the false negative
Both examples still leak the underlying file stream. One exits the method before the wrapper is closed. The other moves stream construction into a helper and then never closes the returned wrapper.
Those are ordinary resource-leak scenarios. Neither refactoring changes the ownership or lifetime of the stream.
Affected test cases
PosCase2_Var3.java
The return bypasses the only close() call. bos and the wrapped FileOutputStream both remain unclosed on the live path.
// FileOutputStream passed to BufferedOutputStream where inner resource not guaranteed to be closed should be flagged.
package scensct.var.pos;
import java.io.BufferedOutputStream;
import java.io.FileOutputStream;
import java.io.IOException;
public class PosCase2_Var3 {
public void writeBuffered() throws IOException {
// Variant 3: Introduce early return that skips close
FileOutputStream fos = new FileOutputStream("data.bin");
BufferedOutputStream bos = new BufferedOutputStream(fos);
bos.write(1);
if (System.currentTimeMillis() > 0) {
return; // exit without closing
}
// Unreachable code, close never called
bos.close();
}
}
PosCase2_Var5.java
The factory method only hides allocation. It does not transfer cleanup responsibility anywhere else, and the caller still never closes the returned stream.
// FileOutputStream passed to BufferedOutputStream where inner resource not guaranteed to be closed should be flagged.
package scensct.var.pos;
import java.io.BufferedOutputStream;
import java.io.FileOutputStream;
import java.io.IOException;
public class PosCase2_Var5 {
public void writeBuffered() throws IOException {
// Variant 5: Wrap in a method that returns the BufferedOutputStream without closing
BufferedOutputStream bos = openBufferedStream("data.bin");
bos.write(1);
// Not closed
}
private BufferedOutputStream openBufferedStream(String file) throws IOException {
FileOutputStream fos = new FileOutputStream(file);
return new BufferedOutputStream(fos);
}
}
Cause analysis
Likely Bugs/Resource Leaks/CloseWriter.ql looks too dependent on one direct construction-and-close pattern. As soon as the leak is expressed through an early return or a helper that returns the wrapper, the result disappears.
That is too brittle for a resource-leak query. In real code, stream creation is often factored into small helpers, and missing close calls frequently happen on short-circuit exits.
- 主要语言
- CodeQL
- 星标
- 10.1k
- 派生
- 2.1k
- 平均合并
- 2 天 16 小时
- 30 天内合并 PR
- 143
贡献指南
从这里开始
- 先读完整个 Issue,再读项目的贡献指南。
- 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
- Fork 仓库,在一个分支上完成修改。
- 提交 Pull Request,并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。
github/codeql 的其他 Issue
-
agentic-workflows
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 70/100
-
false-positive javascript
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 84/100
-
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 82/100
-
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 78/100
-
false-positive
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 70/100
相似的 Issue
-
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 78/100
punkpeye/mcp-remote#369 ·
-
Mend: dependency security vulnerability untriaged
难度 1/5 1 小时以内 新手友好度 86/100
-
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 68/100
-
bug
难度 1/5 1 小时以内 新手友好度 90/100
cisagov/vulnrichment#337 ·
-
bug DUP Reservations
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 68/100
bcgov/reserve-rec-public#896 ·