Hacktoberfest 2026: as issues que os mantenedores marcaram para outubro, abertas e boas para iniciantes. Ver issues do Hacktoberfest

False Negative: CloseWriter.ql misses leaked wrapped streams when the close is skipped by an early return or hidden in a factory.

Aberta
#21,534 1 comentário 0 reações 0 responsáveis Ver no GitHub

Ninguém assumiu esta issue ainda.

Avaliação

Dificuldade
4/5
Tempo estimado
3-5 dias
Facilidade para iniciantes
52/100
Tipo de issue
Bug
Clareza
Claramente especificada
Status de atividade
Pouca atividade
Stack de tecnologia
java
Domínio
security

Direção de pesquisa

Comece lendo Likely Bugs/Resource Leaks/CloseWriter.ql e inspecione os casos afetados em PosCase2_Var3.java e PosCase2_Var5.java. Rastreie como a consulta lida com retornos antecipados e streams criados por helpers e, em seguida, execute os testes relevantes de CloseWriter. Está concluído quando ambos os casos forem reportados como leaks sem quebrar a cobertura existente.

Escrita pelo modelo de indexação a partir do texto da issue.

Descrição

question

Version
codeql 2.24.3

Checker

  • Checker id: Likely Bugs/Resource Leaks/CloseWriter.ql
  • Checker description: This checker detects instances where a Writer or OutputStream is created but not guaranteed to be closed on method exit, potentially causing resource leaks.

Description of the false negative

Both examples still leak the underlying file stream. One exits the method before the wrapper is closed. The other moves stream construction into a helper and then never closes the returned wrapper.

Those are ordinary resource-leak scenarios. Neither refactoring changes the ownership or lifetime of the stream.

Affected test cases

PosCase2_Var3.java

The return bypasses the only close() call. bos and the wrapped FileOutputStream both remain unclosed on the live path.

// FileOutputStream passed to BufferedOutputStream where inner resource not guaranteed to be closed should be flagged.
package scensct.var.pos;

import java.io.BufferedOutputStream;
import java.io.FileOutputStream;
import java.io.IOException;

public class PosCase2_Var3 {
    public void writeBuffered() throws IOException {
        // Variant 3: Introduce early return that skips close
        FileOutputStream fos = new FileOutputStream("data.bin");
        BufferedOutputStream bos = new BufferedOutputStream(fos);
        bos.write(1);
        if (System.currentTimeMillis() > 0) {
            return; // exit without closing
        }
        // Unreachable code, close never called
        bos.close();
    }
}
PosCase2_Var5.java

The factory method only hides allocation. It does not transfer cleanup responsibility anywhere else, and the caller still never closes the returned stream.

// FileOutputStream passed to BufferedOutputStream where inner resource not guaranteed to be closed should be flagged.
package scensct.var.pos;

import java.io.BufferedOutputStream;
import java.io.FileOutputStream;
import java.io.IOException;

public class PosCase2_Var5 {
    public void writeBuffered() throws IOException {
        // Variant 5: Wrap in a method that returns the BufferedOutputStream without closing
        BufferedOutputStream bos = openBufferedStream("data.bin");
        bos.write(1);
        // Not closed
    }
    
    private BufferedOutputStream openBufferedStream(String file) throws IOException {
        FileOutputStream fos = new FileOutputStream(file);
        return new BufferedOutputStream(fos);
    }
}

Cause analysis

Likely Bugs/Resource Leaks/CloseWriter.ql looks too dependent on one direct construction-and-close pattern. As soon as the leak is expressed through an early return or a helper that returns the wrapper, the result disappears.

That is too brittle for a resource-leak query. In real code, stream creation is often factored into small helpers, and missing close calls frequently happen on short-circuit exits.

Linguagem predominante
CodeQL
Estrelas
10.1k
Forks
2.1k
Merge médio
2d 16h
PRs com merge (30d)
143

Guia de contribuição

Abrir o guia de contribuição

Primeiros passos

  1. Leia a issue inteira e depois o guia de contribuição do projeto.
  2. Comente na issue dizendo que vai assumir — evita que duas pessoas façam o mesmo trabalho.
  3. Faça um fork do repositório e trabalhe em uma branch.
  4. Abra um pull request que referencie o número da issue.

Mais de github/codeql

Todas as issues de github/codeql

Issues semelhantes

Mais issues de Security

Receba novas issues na sua caixa de entrada

Um resumo curto de issues do GitHub para quem está começando.