Hacktoberfest 2026：维护者为十月标记出来的 issue，仍然开放、适合新手。 浏览 Hacktoberfest issue

Eight FLoRA replication DOIs point to PCI RR recommendations or reviews, not the replication report

未关闭 适合新手
  • 哪里不对？
#152 1 条评论 0 个 reaction 已指派 0 人 在 GitHub 查看

还没有人认领这个 Issue。

评估

难度
2/5
预计耗时
1-3 小时
新手友好度
68/100
Issue 类型
缺陷
描述清晰度
描述清楚
活跃度
活跃
领域
data

调研方向

在条目表中根据当前的 doi_r 匹配这八个条目；issue指出，行号来自本地CSV导出文件，可能已经发生偏移。对照Crossref确认的Stage 2报告检查每个建议的替换项，并为第2141行保留OSF报告。然后，在去重之前检查五个N2pc条目的 doi_o 变体。完成标准是：复现研究的DOI引文能够标识这些报告，并且重复项得到了统一处理。

由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。

描述

Eight FLoRA entries use a Peer Community in Registered Reports (PCI RR) record as the replication DOI (doi_r). None of these records is the replication report itself. Crossref registers each one as a record about the report: the recommendation, a reviewer's report, the decision letter, or the authors' response. The recommender is listed as the author, and Crossref's is-review-of relation points to the reviewed preprint. As a result, the ref_r citations name the recommender or "Review of: …" instead of the authors of the replication.

The table gives the is-review-of target from Crossref and, where one exists, the published article. I confirmed each article in Crossref (title, authors and journal) as the Stage 2 report of the same study. I suggest using the published article where there is one, and the reviewed preprint otherwise.

Row numbers refer to a local CSV export of the entry sheet (header = row 1). Please match on doi_r in case the live sheet has moved.

Row Current doi_r What it is is-review-of (Crossref) Suggested doi_r
1663 10.24072/pci.rr.100411 Recommendation (Sherman, 2023), Stage 1 https://psyarxiv.com/3472y 10.1016/j.cortex.2025.05.014: Constant et al. (2025), Cortex
2142 10.24072/pci.rr.100998 Recommendation (Sherman, 2025), Stage 2 10.31234/osf.io/3472y_v3 10.1016/j.cortex.2025.05.014
2143 10.24072/pci.rr.100998.ar1 Author response 10.31234/osf.io/3472y_v3 10.1016/j.cortex.2025.05.014
2144 10.24072/pci.rr.100998.d1 Decision letter ("Decision Revise") 10.31234/osf.io/3472y_v3 10.1016/j.cortex.2025.05.014
2145 10.24072/pci.rr.100998.rev11 Reviewer report 10.31234/osf.io/3472y_v3 10.1016/j.cortex.2025.05.014
2015 10.24072/pci.rr.100609 Recommendation (Rahal, 2024) https://osf.io/9cqp6 10.1177/17470218241255916: Mayiwar, Wan, Løhre & Feldman (2024), QJEP
2141 10.24072/pci.rr.100314 Recommendation (Chambers, 2025) https://osf.io/397xg https://osf.io/397xg (no published article found; see note)
3530 10.24072/pci.rr.100375.rev12 Reviewer report https://osf.io/pkw4g 10.1098/rsos.250979: Li & Feldman (2025), Royal Society Open Science

Duplicates after the fix. All five N2pc rows (1663, 2142–2145) describe one replication of Eimer (1996). Once corrected, they collapse into a single pair or a set of study-level rows. Their doi_o also differs: rows 1663 and 2145 use 10.1016/0013-4694(96)95711-9, and rows 2142–2144 use 10.1016/s0921-884x(96)95711-2. Both are Elsevier DOIs for Eimer (1996); it is worth confirming which one is canonical before deduplicating.

Diversification bias (row 2141), Li & Feldman, replicating Fox, Ratner & Lieb (2005). Neither Crossref nor OpenAlex lists a published article yet. Royal Society Open Science supplementary material for this registered report is on figshare (10.6084/m9.figshare.c.8684017, 2026), so an RSOS article is probably forthcoming. Until it appears, the OSF Stage 2 report is the best identifier.

Peer Community Journal articles (10.24072/pcjournal.…) are real articles and are not affected. FLoRA Extractor now treats 10.24072/pci.* DOIs as non-article records (forrtproject/flora-extractor#222).

主要语言
HTML
星标
1
派生
0
30 天内没有已合并 PR

环境准备

这个项目没有提供开发容器、Dockerfile 或贡献指南，环境需要你自己搭建：先看它的 README，通用步骤见我们的新手贡献指南。

从这里开始

  1. 先读完整个 Issue，再读项目的贡献指南。
  2. 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
  3. Fork 仓库，在一个分支上完成修改。
  4. 提交 Pull Request，并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。

forrtproject/fred-data 的其他 Issue

查看 forrtproject/fred-data 的全部 Issue

相似的 Issue

更多 Data Engineering Issue

把新 issue 发到你的邮箱

精选适合新手参与的 GitHub issue 摘要。