Improve rating of difficulty
还没有人认领这个 Issue。
评估
调研方向
从 config.json 开始,结合 issue 中提到的练习描述,审查现有的难度值。明确评分是相对的,还是与定义好的学习者水平相关,然后在更新元数据之前,就提议的差异达成共识;完成意味着双方已就量表和修订后的评分达成一致,并且它们已在 config.json 中得到一致反映。
由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。
描述
config.json assigns a "difficulty" to each exercise.
Here they are:
1
hello-world
leap
luhn
space-age
two-fer
2
collatz-conjecture
gigasecond
grains
pangram
raindrops
reverse-string
secret-handshake
3
acronym
allergies
armstrong-numbers
atbash-cipher
binary
difference-of-squares
etl
grade-school
hamming
hexadecimal
isogram
matching-brackets
nucleotide-count
pascals-triangle
protein-translation
rna-transcription
scrabble-score
sum-of-multiples
triangle
trinary
4
all-your-base
binary-search
robot-simulator
5
anagram
bob
clock
meetup
nth-prime
phone-number
prime-factors
queen-attack
robot-name
series
sieve
word-count
6
circular-buffer
complex-numbers
7
beer-song
crypto-square
food-chain
roman-numerals
10
binary-search-tree
say
IMHO some of those ratings are wildly off, e.g.:
- luhn is definitely more difficult than hello-world, leap, or two-fer
- I've mentored space-age several hundred times. Many students struggle with that exercise because they member functions have to be const-qualified and they have to choose a type that can represent the age in seconds for all tests.
- pangram and isogram are very similar, IMHO they are equally difficult.
(The only thing that makes isogram a little bit tricky is that the description doesn't restrict the characters to ASCII so one has to be careful not to callstd::isalpha()orstd::tolower()with achar.) - Are beer-song and food-chain really that complicated? (Frankly, I never understood the appeal of those exercises.)
I'm sure you can easily spot some more discrepancies.
And a more general question: Are the difficulties rated in comparison to each other or do those ratings have some meaning (e.g. 1=for beginners who just wrote their first hello-world, 4=for those who feel comfortable writing classes and functions, 7=complex tasks with multiple requirements)?
- 主要语言
- C++
- 星标
- 291
- 派生
- 244
- 平均合并
- 17 分钟
- 30 天内合并 PR
- 1
贡献指南
这个仓库没有索引到贡献指南
从这里开始
- 先读完整个 Issue,再读项目的贡献指南。
- 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
- Fork 仓库,在一个分支上完成修改。
- 提交 Pull Request,并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。
exercism/cpp 的其他 Issue
-
难度 4/5 3-5 天 新手友好度 35/100
-
难度 4/5 3-5 天 新手友好度 48/100
-
难度 4/5 3-5 天 新手友好度 45/100
-
难度 4/5 3-5 天 新手友好度 35/100
-
难度 4/5 3-5 天 新手友好度 35/100
相似的 Issue
-
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 70/100
google/libultrahdr#485 ·
-
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 75/100
godotengine/godot#123776 ·
-
bug
难度 1/5 1 小时以内 新手友好度 60/100
-
good first issue
难度 1/5 1 小时以内 新手友好度 90/100
-
good first issue
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 75/100
ros2/common_interfaces#344 ·