Hacktoberfest 2026:维护者为十月标记出来的 issue,仍然开放、适合新手。 浏览 Hacktoberfest issue

delete() does nothing when its restriction contains a percent sign

未关闭
#1,636 0 条评论 0 个 reaction 已指派 0 人 在 GitHub 查看

维护者通常 4 天内回复

@dimitri-yatsenko 已经在做这个了。

开始于 2026年10月17日。

  • #1611 来自 @dimitri-yatsenko —— 未关闭

评估

难度
3/5
预计耗时
1-2 天
新手友好度
78/100
Issue 类型
缺陷
描述清晰度
描述清楚
活跃度
活跃
技术栈
mysql, postgresql, python
领域
database

调研方向

Start with the cascade implementation around Diagram.cascade() and the restriction handling in restrict(), then trace how conditions are reapplied to the fresh table. Reproduce the % cases with the issue’s Label and Use example. Done means the cascade deletes the matching row and its descendants without changing behavior for ordinary conditions or LIKE patterns, with regression tests covering both database drivers.

由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。

描述

bug

Summary

A delete restricted by a condition that contains % deletes nothing. (Label & "name = '50%'").delete() returns 0 and leaves the row and its descendants in place, and so does a dict restriction such as {"name": "50%"}. dj.Diagram.cascade(seed).counts() reports 0 rows for every table, although len(seed) is 1.

A restriction's conditions are stored as compiled SQL, with every % already escaped as %% for the database driver. The cascade applies the seed's conditions again to a fresh copy of the table through restrict(), which escapes every % a second time. The condition then looks for the literal text 50%% and matches no row.

A LIKE pattern keeps working, because %% and % match the same strings there.

Nothing is deleted that should not be, but the delete silently does nothing.

Reproduction

DataJoint 2.3.4 and master, MySQL 8.0 and PostgreSQL 15:

import datajoint as dj

schema = dj.Schema("scratch_percent")


@schema
class Label(dj.Manual):
    definition = """
    label_id : int32
    ---
    name : varchar(16)
    """


@schema
class Use(dj.Manual):
    definition = """
    -> Label
    use_id : int32
    """


Label.insert([(1, "50%"), (2, "other")])
Use.insert([(1, 1), (2, 1)])

seed = Label & "name = '50%'"
print(len(seed))                               # 1
print(dj.Diagram.cascade(seed).counts())       # 0 rows in each table
print(seed.delete(prompt=False))               # 0; both labels and both uses remain

Workaround

Restrict by the primary keys: (Label & seed.keys()).delete().

Expected behavior

The cascade selects the same rows as the restriction on its own: label 1 and its use.

主要语言
Python
星标
197
派生
101
平均合并
3 天 8 小时
30 天内合并 PR
28

环境准备

  • 提供 Dockerfile 或 Docker Compose 文件
  • 没有 Pull Request 模板
  • 阅读贡献指南

从这里开始

  1. 先读完整个 Issue,再读项目的贡献指南。
  2. 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
  3. Fork 仓库,在一个分支上完成修改。
  4. 提交 Pull Request,并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。

datajoint/datajoint-python 的其他 Issue

查看 datajoint/datajoint-python 的全部 Issue

相似的 Issue

更多 Python Issue

把新 issue 发到你的邮箱

精选适合新手参与的 GitHub issue 摘要。