[Plugin] Preserve handler errors in invocation-end hooks when returning PENDING
维护者通常 1 天内回复
还没有人认领这个 Issue。
评估
调研方向
Start with the revoked-token branches in execution.py around lines 449-463, which replace the handler error with an error-free PENDING output, then read plugin.py around lines 845-851, where the invocation output is rebuilt from the service-response dictionary. The JavaScript answerPending in with-durable-execution.ts shows the separation to copy: forward the error to plugins while returning bare PENDING. Done means the invocation-end hook gets PENDING with the original error, the service response stays exactly {"Status": "PENDING"}, and unit tests check both.
由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。
描述
Expected behavior
When a handler raises an error and checkpoint-token withdrawal requires a PENDING response, the invocation-end hook should retain the original error details in InvocationEndInfo.error. Its status should remain PENDING.
The service response must remain exactly {"Status": "PENDING"}. It must contain neither Error nor Result. Ordinary suspension without a handler error should continue to report error=None.
Actual behavior
The revoked-token branches replace handler errors with an error-free pending output in execution.py:449–463.
The plugin wrapper reconstructs its invocation output from that service-response dictionary in plugin.py:845–851. So the invocation-end hook receives PENDING without the handler error.
JavaScript separates these outputs. Its answerPending implementation, with-durable-execution.ts:184–198, forwards executionError to plugins but returns bare PENDING to the service.
Reproduction scenario
- Register a plugin that records the invocation-end status and error.
- Invoke a handler that raises
ValueError("handler failed"). - Arrange for checkpoint-token withdrawal before the wrapper handles that exception.
- Inspect the hook payload and returned dictionary.
The dictionary is bare PENDING, as required. The hook error is None, so the handler failure details are lost.
This scenario follows from source inspection at Python revision 52b63b5f; it has not been executed for this report.
Acceptance criteria
- Preserve the original handler error details in exactly one
PENDINGinvocation-end notification. - Keep the service response exactly
{"Status": "PENDING"}. - Keep suspension without a handler error free of fabricated errors.
- Add unit coverage that checks the hook payload and service response together.
- Add an end-to-end regression for the handler-to-plugin path.
- Preserve existing success, failure, and retry behavior.
Context
Follow-up to PR #757’s plugin-error parity discussion.
- 主要语言
- Python
- 星标
- 58
- 派生
- 32
- 平均合并
- 1 天 6 小时
- 30 天内合并 PR
- 80
环境准备
- 没有 Dockerfile 或 Docker Compose 文件
- 有 Pull Request 模板
- 阅读贡献指南
从这里开始
- 先读完整个 Issue,再读项目的贡献指南。
- 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
- Fork 仓库,在一个分支上完成修改。
- 提交 Pull Request,并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。
aws/aws-durable-execution-sdk-python 的其他 Issue
-
enhancement needs-triage
难度 1/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 72/100
aws/aws-durable-execution-sdk-python#927 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
enhancement
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 82/100
aws/aws-durable-execution-sdk-python#875 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
enhancement
难度 1/5 1 小时以内 新手友好度 85/100
aws/aws-durable-execution-sdk-python#794 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
bug
难度 3/5 1-2 天 新手友好度 58/100
aws/aws-durable-execution-sdk-python#921 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
[Bug]: JS examples CI still invokes Jest after Vitest migration可能已有人在做 关联的 PR 仍在进行中或已合并。 未关闭bug needs-triage
难度 3/5 1-2 天 新手友好度 55/100
aws/aws-durable-execution-sdk-python#918 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
查看 aws/aws-durable-execution-sdk-python 的全部 Issue
相似的 Issue
-
physical
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 74/100
antonyrag/ragleap-core#1339 ·
-
enhancement good first issue
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 83/100
AllenCell/SubCellSeg#5 ·
-
[🐛 Bug]: oidc_authverifier.py strips trailing slash causing "Invalid token: Invalid issuer" error未关闭
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 76/100
keephq/keep#6934 · 1 个 reaction ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
bug game: 01008BA02525A000 ios
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 76/100
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
needs-triage
难度 1/5 1 小时以内 新手友好度 87/100
gke-labs/kube-agents#5501 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复