signInSilently() always resolves false: getAuthorizeRequestUrlParams overwrites the "sign-in-silently" state with instance_<id>
维护者通常 1 天内回复
评估
- 难度
- 3/5
- 预计耗时
- 1-2 天
- 新手友好度
- 78/100
- Issue 类型
- 缺陷
- 描述清晰度
- 描述清楚
- 活跃度
- 活跃
- 技术栈
- typescript
调研方向
Start in packages/javascript/src/utils/getAuthorizeRequestUrlParams.ts and trace getSignInUrl in packages/javascript/src/legacy/client.ts, then compare the silent-sign-in callers in main-thread-client.ts and web-worker-client.ts. Add or update a regression test for getSignInUrl({ prompt: 'none', state: 'sign-in-silently' }) with instance ID 0. Done means the generated state retains the silent marker and the relevant test suite passes.
由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。
描述
Description
signInSilently() can never report success. The silent sign-in URL is built with
state: "sign-in-silently", but getAuthorizeRequestUrlParams replaces the caller's
state with instance_<instanceId> whenever an instance ID is present — and
getSignInUrl always passes one. The authorize request goes out with
state=instance_0_request_N, so the hidden iframe never recognises the IdP's
response as a silent sign-in, never posts the code to the parent, and the parent's
10 s timeout resolves false.
The override was introduced in 10ca5ed4 ("Refactor instance ID handling in authorization
flow and update state parameter format") and is still present on main (3487684).
Root cause
- The silent sign-in URL asks for the silent state
(main-thread-client.ts#L325-L330,
same in web-worker-client.ts#L420-L426):_authenticationClient.getSignInUrl({ prompt: 'none', state: SILENT_SIGN_IN_STATE, ...additionalParams }) getSignInUrlalways passes an instance ID
(legacy/client.ts#L288):
instanceId: this.getInstanceId().toString()—"0"for the default instance, which is truthy.getAuthorizeRequestUrlParamsthen discards the caller's state
(getAuthorizeRequestUrlParams.ts#L101-L121).
stateis skipped in thecustomParamsloop (L103), and the only branch that would
use it is unreachable wheninstanceIdis set:if (options.instanceId) { customStateValue = AUTH_INSTANCE_PREFIX + options.instanceId; // always taken } else if (customParams) { customStateValue = customParams[OIDCRequestConstants.Params.STATE]?.toString() ?? ''; // never reached }- In the iframe, the response is only treated as a silent sign-in if the state contains the marker
(session-management-helper.ts#L178,
spa-utils.ts#L152-L156):
state.includes(SILENT_SIGN_IN_STATE)is false, so nothing is posted to the parent, and the parent
resolvesfalseon its timeout
(authentication-helper.ts#L574).
The check-session prompt-none request passes state: STATE the same way
(session-management-helper.ts#L158),
so syncSession looks affected by the same override (not verified at runtime).
Expected
The authorize request carries a state containing sign-in-silently; the iframe posts
the code to the parent, the parent exchanges it, and the promise resolves with the user.
Actual
Captured with the Chrome DevTools Protocol:
- The
/oauth2/authorize?prompt=nonerequest carries the IdP session cookies
(commonAuthId,opbs,SameSite=None) — none excluded, so this is not
third-party-cookie blocking. - The IdP answers
302 Location: <afterSignInUrl>?code=…&session_state=…&state=instance_0_request_1. - The iframe loads
afterSignInUrlwith that code. Nothing is posted to the parent,
the parent makes no token request, andsignInSilently()resolvesfalse~10 s later.
Side effect: because afterSignInUrl is the app itself, the app boots inside the iframe
and shares the tab's sessionStorage. Its AsgardeoProvider then either
- sees
isSignedIn()true and ignores the code (nothing is renewed), or - runs a normal
signIn()and exchanges the code itself (token request initiated from
signIn), so the session is renewed — while the parent still getsfalse.
An app that treats false as "session lost" therefore asks the user to sign in again
even when it now holds valid tokens.
Suggested fix
Keep both parts instead of letting the instance prefix replace the caller's state:
const instanceState = options.instanceId ? AUTH_INSTANCE_PREFIX + options.instanceId : '';
const callerState = customParams?.[OIDCRequestConstants.Params.STATE]?.toString() ?? '';
const customStateValue = [instanceState, callerState].filter(Boolean).join('_');
This yields e.g. instance_0_sign-in-silently_request_0, which still satisfies
hasCalledForThisInstanceInUrl (state=instance_<id>_[^&]+) and
state.includes(SILENT_SIGN_IN_STATE) / state.includes(STATE).
A regression test for getSignInUrl({ prompt: 'none', state: 'sign-in-silently' })
with instance ID 0 asserting the marker survives would cover it.
Related: #527 (no on-demand refresh-token use when the access token has expired).
Steps to Reproduce
- React SPA with
<AsgardeoProvider>, default config (sessionStorage, PKCE on),
afterSignInUrlset to the app's own origin (e.g.http://localhost:3000). - Sign in normally.
- Call
signInSilently()fromuseAsgardeo()and inspect the network. - Observe the authorize request's
state=instance_0_request_N(nosign-in-silently),
the IdP's 302 with a code into the hidden iframe, and the promise resolvingfalse
after ~10 s.
Please select the area the issue is related to
@asgardeo/javascript, @asgardeo/browser, @asgardeo/react
Version
@asgardeo/react 0.25.14 (@asgardeo/browser 0.7.17, @asgardeo/javascript 0.23.6); also reproduced on @asgardeo/react 0.22.4 (@asgardeo/browser 0.6.6, @asgardeo/javascript 0.18.0). Present on main at 3487684.
Environment Details (with versions)
macOS 26.6.2, Chrome 154.0.8037.93, React 19.2.3.
Reporter Checklist
- I have searched the existing issues and this is not a duplicate.
- I have provided all the necessary information.
- I have tested the issue on the latest version of the package.
- 主要语言
- TypeScript
- 星标
- 18
- 派生
- 67
- 平均合并
- 3 小时 40 分钟
- 30 天内合并 PR
- 15
环境准备
- 没有 Dockerfile 或 Docker Compose 文件
- 有 Pull Request 模板
- 阅读贡献指南
从这里开始
- 先读完整个 Issue,再读项目的贡献指南。
- 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
- Fork 仓库,在一个分支上完成修改。
- 提交 Pull Request,并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。
asgardeo/javascript 的其他 Issue
-
Bug: SignInButton render prop usage in "react-tanstack-router" sample missing "onClick={signIn}"可能已有人在做 @KavishkaVenuka 于 14 天前认领。 未关闭Type/Bug
难度 1/5 1 小时以内 新手友好度 92/100
asgardeo/javascript#572 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
Type/Bug
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 84/100
asgardeo/javascript#571 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 76/100
asgardeo/javascript#485 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
难度 4/5 3-5 天 新手友好度 52/100
asgardeo/javascript#527 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
难度 3/5 1-2 天 新手友好度 56/100
asgardeo/javascript#522 · 2 条评论 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
查看 asgardeo/javascript 的全部 Issue
相似的 Issue
-
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 78/100
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
bug:new
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 76/100
callstackincubator/simlock#350 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 76/100
openwatersio/maritime-zones#33 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
Booking email verification fails for plus aliases with impersonation protection enabled可能已有人在做 @kankadev 今天认领。 未关闭
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 88/100
calcom/cal.diy#30293 · 1 条评论 ·
维护者通常 5 天内回复
-
bug
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 72/100
AOSSIE-Org/DebateAI#611 ·
维护者通常 3 天内回复