signInSilently() always resolves false: getAuthorizeRequestUrlParams overwrites the "sign-in-silently" state with instance_<id>
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
Valutazione
- Difficoltà
- 3/5
- Tempo stimato
- 1-2 giorni
- Idoneità per principianti
- 78/100
- Tipo di issue
- Bug
- Chiarezza
- Specificata chiaramente
- Stato di attività
- Attiva
- Stack tecnologico
- typescript
- Ambito
- authentication
Direzione di ricerca
Start in packages/javascript/src/utils/getAuthorizeRequestUrlParams.ts and trace getSignInUrl in packages/javascript/src/legacy/client.ts, then compare the silent-sign-in callers in main-thread-client.ts and web-worker-client.ts. Add or update a regression test for getSignInUrl({ prompt: 'none', state: 'sign-in-silently' }) with instance ID 0. Done means the generated state retains the silent marker and the relevant test suite passes.
Scritto dal modello di indicizzazione a partire dal testo della issue.
Descrizione
Description
signInSilently() can never report success. The silent sign-in URL is built with
state: "sign-in-silently", but getAuthorizeRequestUrlParams replaces the caller's
state with instance_<instanceId> whenever an instance ID is present — and
getSignInUrl always passes one. The authorize request goes out with
state=instance_0_request_N, so the hidden iframe never recognises the IdP's
response as a silent sign-in, never posts the code to the parent, and the parent's
10 s timeout resolves false.
The override was introduced in 10ca5ed4 ("Refactor instance ID handling in authorization
flow and update state parameter format") and is still present on main (3487684).
Root cause
- The silent sign-in URL asks for the silent state
(main-thread-client.ts#L325-L330,
same in web-worker-client.ts#L420-L426):_authenticationClient.getSignInUrl({ prompt: 'none', state: SILENT_SIGN_IN_STATE, ...additionalParams }) getSignInUrlalways passes an instance ID
(legacy/client.ts#L288):
instanceId: this.getInstanceId().toString()—"0"for the default instance, which is truthy.getAuthorizeRequestUrlParamsthen discards the caller's state
(getAuthorizeRequestUrlParams.ts#L101-L121).
stateis skipped in thecustomParamsloop (L103), and the only branch that would
use it is unreachable wheninstanceIdis set:if (options.instanceId) { customStateValue = AUTH_INSTANCE_PREFIX + options.instanceId; // always taken } else if (customParams) { customStateValue = customParams[OIDCRequestConstants.Params.STATE]?.toString() ?? ''; // never reached }- In the iframe, the response is only treated as a silent sign-in if the state contains the marker
(session-management-helper.ts#L178,
spa-utils.ts#L152-L156):
state.includes(SILENT_SIGN_IN_STATE)is false, so nothing is posted to the parent, and the parent
resolvesfalseon its timeout
(authentication-helper.ts#L574).
The check-session prompt-none request passes state: STATE the same way
(session-management-helper.ts#L158),
so syncSession looks affected by the same override (not verified at runtime).
Expected
The authorize request carries a state containing sign-in-silently; the iframe posts
the code to the parent, the parent exchanges it, and the promise resolves with the user.
Actual
Captured with the Chrome DevTools Protocol:
- The
/oauth2/authorize?prompt=nonerequest carries the IdP session cookies
(commonAuthId,opbs,SameSite=None) — none excluded, so this is not
third-party-cookie blocking. - The IdP answers
302 Location: <afterSignInUrl>?code=…&session_state=…&state=instance_0_request_1. - The iframe loads
afterSignInUrlwith that code. Nothing is posted to the parent,
the parent makes no token request, andsignInSilently()resolvesfalse~10 s later.
Side effect: because afterSignInUrl is the app itself, the app boots inside the iframe
and shares the tab's sessionStorage. Its AsgardeoProvider then either
- sees
isSignedIn()true and ignores the code (nothing is renewed), or - runs a normal
signIn()and exchanges the code itself (token request initiated from
signIn), so the session is renewed — while the parent still getsfalse.
An app that treats false as "session lost" therefore asks the user to sign in again
even when it now holds valid tokens.
Suggested fix
Keep both parts instead of letting the instance prefix replace the caller's state:
const instanceState = options.instanceId ? AUTH_INSTANCE_PREFIX + options.instanceId : '';
const callerState = customParams?.[OIDCRequestConstants.Params.STATE]?.toString() ?? '';
const customStateValue = [instanceState, callerState].filter(Boolean).join('_');
This yields e.g. instance_0_sign-in-silently_request_0, which still satisfies
hasCalledForThisInstanceInUrl (state=instance_<id>_[^&]+) and
state.includes(SILENT_SIGN_IN_STATE) / state.includes(STATE).
A regression test for getSignInUrl({ prompt: 'none', state: 'sign-in-silently' })
with instance ID 0 asserting the marker survives would cover it.
Related: #527 (no on-demand refresh-token use when the access token has expired).
Steps to Reproduce
- React SPA with
<AsgardeoProvider>, default config (sessionStorage, PKCE on),
afterSignInUrlset to the app's own origin (e.g.http://localhost:3000). - Sign in normally.
- Call
signInSilently()fromuseAsgardeo()and inspect the network. - Observe the authorize request's
state=instance_0_request_N(nosign-in-silently),
the IdP's 302 with a code into the hidden iframe, and the promise resolvingfalse
after ~10 s.
Please select the area the issue is related to
@asgardeo/javascript, @asgardeo/browser, @asgardeo/react
Version
@asgardeo/react 0.25.14 (@asgardeo/browser 0.7.17, @asgardeo/javascript 0.23.6); also reproduced on @asgardeo/react 0.22.4 (@asgardeo/browser 0.6.6, @asgardeo/javascript 0.18.0). Present on main at 3487684.
Environment Details (with versions)
macOS 26.6.2, Chrome 154.0.8037.93, React 19.2.3.
Reporter Checklist
- I have searched the existing issues and this is not a duplicate.
- I have provided all the necessary information.
- I have tested the issue on the latest version of the package.
- Lingua principale
- TypeScript
- Stelle
- 18
- Fork
- 67
- Merge medio
- 3h 40m
- PR unite (30g)
- 15
Preparare l'ambiente
- Nessun Dockerfile né file Docker Compose
- Ha un modello di pull request
- Leggi la guida per i contributori
Come iniziare
- Leggi tutta la issue e poi la guida ai contributi del progetto.
- Commenta sulla issue per dire che te ne occupi tu — evita che due persone facciano lo stesso lavoro.
- Fai un fork del repository e lavora su un branch.
- Apri una pull request che faccia riferimento al numero della issue.
Altre issue di asgardeo/javascript
-
Bug: SignInButton render prop usage in "react-tanstack-router" sample missing "onClick={signIn}"Forse già presa @KavishkaVenuka l’ha presa 13 giorni fa. ApertaType/Bug
Difficoltà 1/5 Meno di un'ora Idoneità per principianti 92/100
asgardeo/javascript#572 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
Type/Bug
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 84/100
asgardeo/javascript#571 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 76/100
asgardeo/javascript#485 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
Difficoltà 4/5 3-5 giorni Idoneità per principianti 52/100
asgardeo/javascript#527 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
Difficoltà 3/5 1-2 giorni Idoneità per principianti 56/100
asgardeo/javascript#522 · 2 commenti ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
Tutte le issue di asgardeo/javascript
Issue simili
-
bug
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 78/100
Effect-TS/effect#8728 · 1 commento ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
Add: CanalPlusSport8SK.skApertacheck:passed streams:add
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 66/100
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
bug
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 90/100
linagora/twake-drive-mobile#436 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
[Bug] The shared instance selector's placeholder and no-match text ignore the display languageForse già presa Una pull request collegata a questa issue è aperta o già unita. Aperta
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 90/100
apache/rocketmq-dashboard#5561 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 3 giorni
-
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 87/100
heygen-com/hyperframes#5002 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno