`Expr::Not` and `PhysicalExpr::NotExpr` have different metadata propagation rules

未关闭
#27,155 0 条评论 0 个 reaction 已指派 0 人 在 GitHub 查看

维护者通常 1 天内回复

还没有人认领这个 Issue。

评估

难度
4/5
预计耗时
3-5 天
新手友好度
57/100
Issue 类型
缺陷
描述清晰度
基本清楚
活跃度
活跃
技术栈
rust
领域
backend, databases

调研方向

The reproduction identifies Expr::Not::to_field and physical NotExpr::return_field as the paths with different metadata results. Read those implementations and nearby expression metadata tests first; the issue leaves open which behavior is correct. Decide on consistent propagation rules, add a regression test for the chosen behavior, and verify logical and physical fields agree.

由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。

描述

bug
Describe the bug

The logical an physical representations of NOT propagate metadata differently.

I'm actually not sure which one is more correct...some metadata uses like "sensor" or "where this value came from" probably are not lying after a NOT operation; however, it's also a little like a function call which would discard its output metadata.

To Reproduce
#[test]
fn not_metadata_differs_between_logical_and_physical() -> Result<()> {
    let schema = Schema::new(vec![Field::new("flag", DataType::Boolean, false)]);
    let df_schema = DFSchema::try_from(schema.clone())?;

    let metadata = FieldMetadata::from(HashMap::from([(
        "source".to_string(),
        "input".to_string(),
    )]));

    let expr = Expr::Not(Box::new(
        col("flag").alias_with_metadata("flag", Some(metadata)),
    ));

    let logical_field = expr.to_field(&df_schema)?.1;
    let physical_expr = create_physical_expr(
        &expr,
        &df_schema,
        &ExecutionProps::new(),
        &PhysicalPlanningContext::default(),
    )?;
    let physical_field = physical_expr.return_field(&schema)?;

    // Logical NOT creates a metadata-free Boolean field.
    assert_eq!(logical_field.metadata().get("source"), None);

    // Physical NotExpr forwards its child's field metadata.
    assert_eq!(
        physical_field.metadata().get("source").map(String::as_str),
        Some("input")
    );

    Ok(())
}
Expected behavior

I'd expect the result to match

Additional context

No response

Willingness to contribute

I would like to contribute a fix for this bug, but request guidance from the DataFusion community

主要语言
Rust
星标
9.6k
派生
2.6k
平均合并
3 天 4 小时
30 天内合并 PR
345

环境准备

在 Codespaces 中打开

在浏览器里用你自己的 GitHub 账号启动这个项目的开发容器。

从这里开始

  1. 先读完整个 Issue,再读项目的贡献指南。
  2. 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
  3. Fork 仓库,在一个分支上完成修改。
  4. 提交 Pull Request,并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。

apache/datafusion 的其他 Issue

查看 apache/datafusion 的全部 Issue

相似的 Issue

更多 Rust Issue

把新 issue 发到你的邮箱

精选适合新手参与的 GitHub issue 摘要。