Hacktoberfest 2026:维护者为十月标记出来的 issue,仍然开放、适合新手。 浏览 Hacktoberfest issue

feat(vault): server-side pinning broker routes

未关闭
#45 0 条评论 0 个 reaction 已指派 0 人 在 GitHub 查看

维护者通常 1 天内回复

还没有人认领这个 Issue。

评估

难度
4/5
预计耗时
3-5 天
新手友好度
54/100
Issue 类型
功能
描述清晰度
基本清楚
活跃度
活跃
技术栈
next.js, typescript
领域
api, backend, security

调研方向

Start by locating the existing /api/vault/pin* and /api/vault/quota/* route handlers, the session authentication and user-scoping code, and the Pinata and Lighthouse service adapters. Then read the route handler tests and run them to understand the current conventions. Done means adding authenticated broker routes for pin, unpin, and quota, with mocked-provider tests for success, auth, size limits, and typed errors that do not leak tokens.

由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。

描述

enhancement helia storage tier-2

Summary

Add session-authenticated routes that perform pin, unpin and quota calls to Pinata and Lighthouse on the server, so provider credentials never reach the browser.

Estimated size: M

Motivation

Provider tokens are currently shipped to every browser as NEXT_PUBLIC_* variables.

Current state in this repo

  • services/pinata.ts reads NEXT_PUBLIC_PINATA_JWT and services/lighthouse.ts reads NEXT_PUBLIC_LIGHTHOUSE_KEY in the browser.
  • /api/vault/pin* and /api/vault/quota/* only record audit data; they do not call the providers.

Proposal

  • Add /api/vault/broker/pin, /unpin and /quota route handlers, authenticated with the existing session and scoped to the user.
  • Read credentials from server-only env vars (for example PINATA_JWT, LIGHTHOUSE_API_KEY); choose the provider by request parameter.
  • Enforce a request body size limit and basic rate limiting.
  • Additive only: leave the browser adapters untouched in this PR (they switch over in the follow-up).

Acceptance criteria

  • Unauthenticated requests get 401.
  • A pin, unpin and quota call succeeds through the broker against mocked providers.
  • No provider secret is read from a NEXT_PUBLIC_* variable on the broker path.
  • Errors from the provider are mapped to typed responses without leaking tokens into logs.

Out of scope

  • Switching the browser adapters over (separate issue).
  • New providers.

Dependencies

  • None; can be picked up independently.

Testing plan

  • Route handler tests with mocked provider HTTP; auth and size-limit cases.

Part of #43. Ground rules for the content layer: no secrets in the repo, content-layer failures must never block or discard quantum execution, and tests and docs ship with every PR.

主要语言
Python
星标
2
派生
4
平均合并
5 小时 54 分钟
30 天内合并 PR
24

环境准备

  • 提供 Dockerfile 或 Docker Compose 文件
  • 没有 Pull Request 模板
  • 没有贡献指南

从这里开始

  1. 先读完整个 Issue,再读项目的贡献指南。
  2. 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
  3. Fork 仓库,在一个分支上完成修改。
  4. 提交 Pull Request,并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。

QMeshPy/distributed-quantum 的其他 Issue

查看 QMeshPy/distributed-quantum 的全部 Issue

相似的 Issue

更多 Python Issue

把新 issue 发到你的邮箱

精选适合新手参与的 GitHub issue 摘要。