Tearing - Tell a limited plasma from a padded g-file before placing surfaces past the boundary
维护者通常 3 天内回复
还没有人认领这个 Issue。
评估
- 难度
- 4/5
- 预计耗时
- 3-5 天
- 新手友好度
- 35/100
- Issue 类型
- 缺陷
- 描述清晰度
- 基本清楚
- 活跃度
- 活跃
- 领域
- backend
调研方向
Start with the g-file reader, which currently drops the limiter contour, and with the overlap scan that places surfaces past ψ_N = 1 when separatrix_q_law fires on a limited plasma. First keep the limiter contour when it is present, then have the scan check whether the boundary touches the limiter and skip any surface past ψ_N = 1 in that case, with a message saying so. Done when a limited EFIT-style test file with a nearby X-point produces no phantom surface and no overlap warning.
由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。
描述
separatrix_q_law builds a law whenever a poloidal-field minimum on the outermost surface leads to a saddle and the law reproduces the traced shear. A limited plasma with an X-point nearby passes both: one EFIT reconstruction checked gives an X-point at ψ_N = 1.093 and a shear ratio of 0.86. The overlap scan then treats it like a padded diverted file. It places one rational past ψ_N = 1, where no closed surface exists, and warns that no overlap could be established.
Today the domain is unchanged, so this is only a spurious warning. But if the kinetic profiles extend past ψ_N = 1 (p-files often reach about 1.12), that phantom surface would be scored and could move the cut one rational inward.
The size of the gap cannot distinguish the two cases, since a plasma close to diverting can have an X-point just outside ψ_N = 1. The reliable discriminator is the g-file's limiter contour, which GPEC's reader does not keep: a boundary touching the limiter is limited, and no surface past it should be placed.
Done when:
- The reader keeps the limiter contour, where present.
- The scan places no surface past ψ_N = 1 when the boundary touches the limiter, and says so.
- A test with a limited EFIT-style file that has an X-point nearby.
🤖 Generated with Claude Code
- 主要语言
- Julia
- 星标
- 11
- 派生
- 7
- 平均合并
- 3 天 22 小时
- 30 天内合并 PR
- 70
环境准备
- 没有 Dockerfile 或 Docker Compose 文件
- 有 Pull Request 模板
- 没有贡献指南
从这里开始
- 先读完整个 Issue,再读项目的贡献指南。
- 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
- Fork 仓库,在一个分支上完成修改。
- 提交 Pull Request,并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。
OpenFUSIONToolkit/GPEC 的其他 Issue
-
难度 1/5 1 小时以内 新手友好度 82/100
OpenFUSIONToolkit/GPEC#644 ·
维护者通常 3 天内回复
-
难度 3/5 1-2 天 新手友好度 74/100
OpenFUSIONToolkit/GPEC#648 ·
维护者通常 3 天内回复
-
难度 4/5 3-5 天 新手友好度 35/100
OpenFUSIONToolkit/GPEC#643 ·
维护者通常 3 天内回复
-
PerturbedEquilibrium - FEATURE - Complete the resistive perturbed-equilibrium workflow from Galerkin and matched results可能已有人在做 @matt-pharr 于 3 天前认领。 未关闭feature
OpenFUSIONToolkit/GPEC#635 · 1 条评论 · 已指派 1 人 ·
维护者通常 3 天内回复
-
test
难度 4/5 3-5 天 新手友好度 25/100
OpenFUSIONToolkit/GPEC#633 · 2 条评论 ·
维护者通常 3 天内回复
查看 OpenFUSIONToolkit/GPEC 的全部 Issue
相似的 Issue
-
🕷️ bug
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 78/100
CliMA/ClimaSeaIce.jl#203 ·
维护者通常 3 天内回复
-
documentation
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 64/100
JuliaPhysics/BeamletOptics.jl#221 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
release preparation spack
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 67/100
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
30-minutes algorithm any-language codewars dart easy elixir hackerrank hacktoberfest haskell help wanted interview-prep julia leetcode lua open-source r scala students zig
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 68/100
Huerte/algo-solutions-python#163 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
bug
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 76/100
QuantumSavory/QuantumClifford.jl#853 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复