Question: optional LLMSafe Python multi-agent tool-flow compatibility pilot?
维护者通常 1 天内回复
还没有人认领这个 Issue。
评估
调研方向
This is an outreach request asking maintainers to approve an external static scan of Python source, not a code change, and the payload names no file, test or entry point in this repository. A newcomer has nothing to start on here. The only step is a maintainer decision on whether to accept the pilot; any scanning would need prior written approval and a fixed commit.
由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。
描述
Hi ChatDev maintainers,
I'm Paul, maintainer of LLMSafe, a small open-source static scanner for Python agent trust boundaries.
ChatDev 2.0's configurable multi-agent workflows are a useful compatibility and false-positive case: can LLMSafe follow a model-influenced step through a narrowly scoped Python workflow/helper into a real tool capability, while avoiding warnings on intentional orchestration and documenting framework patterns it cannot resolve?
Would your team consider a free, opt-in, source-only compatibility pilot? We'd first agree an immutable public commit, one Python path and a private reporting route. Only with maintainer approval would I scan the public source locally, manually examine every result, and aim to share a concise private report with evidence paths, false positives, blind spots and reproduction commands within two working days of scope agreement.
I have not scanned ChatDev and am not reporting an observed weakness or requesting endorsement. No models, agents, accounts, private data, execution or deployment access are required. This is not a security certification or pentest. Any suspected vulnerability would be reported privately; no results or participation claims would be published without consent.
If this would be useful, please suggest one Python workflow/path and commit (current main is fine). If not, please close; I won't follow up.
Pilot scope: https://github.com/rezerpaul-crypto/llmsafe/blob/main/docs/pilot-program.md
Thanks,
Paul
- 主要语言
- Python
- 星标
- 34.6k
- 派生
- 4.3k
- 平均合并
- 3 小时 23 分钟
- 30 天内合并 PR
- 3
环境准备
- 提供 Dockerfile 或 Docker Compose 文件
- 没有 Pull Request 模板
- 没有贡献指南
从这里开始
- 先读完整个 Issue，再读项目的贡献指南。
- 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
- Fork 仓库，在一个分支上完成修改。
- 提交 Pull Request，并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。
OpenBMB/ChatDev 的其他 Issue
-
FunctionManager reload can execute stale bytecode after same-size source edits可能已有人在做 @jadelike-wine 于 15 天前认领。 未关闭
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 74/100
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
难度 1/5 1 小时以内 新手友好度 76/100
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
CodeReviewModification never shows the programmer the six review regulations, so fixes are made blind to the checklist they are re-reviewed against可能已有人在做 关联的 PR 仍在进行中或已合并。 未关闭
难度 1/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 78/100
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
难度 1/5 1 小时以内 新手友好度 85/100
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
难度 4/5 3-5 天 新手友好度 35/100
维护者通常 1 天内回复
相似的 Issue
-
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 62/100
huggingface/smolagents#3106 ·
维护者通常 2 天内回复
-
area:scripts area:tests bug priority:later
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 72/100
Ikalus1988/MisakaNet#4358 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
Discovered ports from service discovery are never propagated to modules in Module.load()可能已有人在做 @vishalmore90 今天认领。 未关闭
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 70/100
OWASP/Nettacker#1828 · 1 条评论 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
难度 1/5 1 小时以内 新手友好度 88/100
aws-samples/sample-per-model-bedrock#708 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
maintenance
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 62/100