Hacktoberfest 2026:维护者为十月标记出来的 issue,仍然开放、适合新手。 浏览 Hacktoberfest issue

Command handling and version conflicts

未关闭
#110 4 条评论 0 个 reaction 已指派 0 人 在 GitHub 查看

维护者通常 7 天内回复

还没有人认领这个 Issue。

评估

难度
5/5
预计耗时
一周以上
新手友好度
20/100
Issue 类型
功能
描述清晰度
需要澄清
活跃度
停滞
技术栈
csharp
领域
backend

调研方向

Start by reading the command handling flow and aggregate event handling code; the issue does not name specific files or tests. Determine how original events and optimistic concurrency retries should work, including whether retry is optional or the default, then define tests for the chosen behavior. The issue leaves these design decisions unresolved, and its last comment was 657 days ago.

由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。

描述

enhancement

The current command handling flow looks like this:

  • Load the aggregate
  • Call the model
  • Persist new events

When the last step fails due to an optimistic concurrency exception, an external policy can retry the operation because the domain models to retry blindly. However, the stream is loaded again, because the retry happens on the outside. Also, we need to read the stream to get new events that caused the conflict.

However, it's possible to react to the optimistic concurrency exception by reading the stream tail from the last known event version. For shorter streams, the difference would be marginal, but for streams longer than a hundred events it would presumably be faster as we'd only need the stream tail, which most probably only has one event that caused the concurrency exception.

A prerequisite for this would be that the aggregate object contains the list of original events in addition to the list of new events as it does today. Opening up the list of original events for access has other benefits that I would be describing here.

I guess that the optimistic concurrency retry needs to be optional as it's not always the desired default behaviour of the model. The question would be if it should be the default or not...

主要语言
C#
星标
512
派生
99
平均合并
5 天 6 小时
30 天内合并 PR
5

环境准备

  • 提供 Dockerfile 或 Docker Compose 文件
  • 没有 Pull Request 模板
  • 阅读贡献指南

从这里开始

  1. 先读完整个 Issue,再读项目的贡献指南。
  2. 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
  3. Fork 仓库,在一个分支上完成修改。
  4. 提交 Pull Request,并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。

Eventuous/eventuous 的其他 Issue

查看 Eventuous/eventuous 的全部 Issue

相似的 Issue

更多 C# Issue

把新 issue 发到你的邮箱

精选适合新手参与的 GitHub issue 摘要。