Feedback request: ran a config-diff tool against PR #1663 — is this useful on chart values?
维护者通常 1 天内回复
还没有人认领这个 Issue。
评估
- 难度
- 5/5
- 预计耗时
- 一周以上
- 新手友好度
- 20/100
- Issue 类型
- 功能
- 描述清晰度
- 需要澄清
- 活跃度
- 活跃
- 技术栈
- yaml
- 领域
- devops
调研方向
Start by reviewing PR #1663 and the cited charts/*/values.yaml changes, then compare the Flecto output with the raw diff and the repository's current review or CI workflow. This issue is done when maintainers decide whether changed-path comments provide useful signal at this repository's volume; no implementation scope is specified.
由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。
描述
Hi — apologies for arriving via the issue tracker. This is a feedback request rather than a bug report, and "not interested" is a completely fine answer; I'll close it myself if so.
I maintain Flecto, a small open-source tool that reports what a config change actually did, in plain English, as a pull request comment. I've been running it against real repositories rather than my own fixtures, because fixtures tell you nothing about whether the output is useful.
I ran it read-only against your PR #1663 ("remove placeholder values from monitoring chart"):
✅ Check passing — 2 changes in 1 file — 2 changed, 0 added, 0 removed.
Policy: no findings.
| changed | prometheus.server.alertmanagers[0].relabel_configs[0].regex | "<namespace>" | "monitoring" |
| changed | prometheus.server.alertmanagers[0].relabel_configs[1].regex | "<release-name>" | "monitoring" |
The reason I picked this PR: those two values sit five levels down inside
relabel_configs, and in a raw YAML diff they are two lines that look like every other two lines. Naming the full path and the before/after is most of what I am trying to test — whether that framing actually helps a reviewer, or whether it is just the same information rearranged.
Two questions, neither of which needs you to install anything:
- When a PR touches
charts/*/values.yamlin this repo, what do you look at today? Rendered output, the raw diff, or mostly trust plus CI? - With 1600+ PRs, would a comment naming changed paths be signal or noise here?
If the honest answer to 2 is "noise at our volume", that is genuinely the more useful answer for me, and I would rather hear it.
Happy to close this right away if issue-tracker outreach isn't welcome — just say so.
- 主要语言
- Rust
- 星标
- 7
- 派生
- 6
- 平均合并
- 1 天 31 分钟
- 30 天内合并 PR
- 83
环境准备
这个项目没有提供开发容器、Dockerfile 或贡献指南，环境需要你自己搭建：先看它的 README，通用步骤见我们的新手贡献指南。
从这里开始
- 先读完整个 Issue，再读项目的贡献指南。
- 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
- Fork 仓库，在一个分支上完成修改。
- 提交 Pull Request，并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。
DiamondLightSource/workflows 的其他 Issue
-
难度 4/5 3-5 天 新手友好度 35/100
DiamondLightSource/workflows#1720 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
难度 3/5 1-2 天 新手友好度 42/100
DiamondLightSource/workflows#1719 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
难度 3/5 1-2 天 新手友好度 45/100
DiamondLightSource/workflows#1716 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
workflows lint-config always fails on ClusterTriggerTemplate manifests ("found nothing to lint")未关闭
难度 3/5 1-2 天 新手友好度 58/100
DiamondLightSource/workflows#1612 · 2 条评论 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
难度 4/5 3-5 天 新手友好度 48/100
DiamondLightSource/workflows#1288 · 1 条评论 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
查看 DiamondLightSource/workflows 的全部 Issue
相似的 Issue
-
ai_p1 comp-message-queues
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 72/100
ClickHouse/ClickHouse#125890 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 66/100
storytold/photocraft#5710 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
Two tests fail on a Windows checkout: a CRLF parse in feature_walk_tests, an 8.3 TEMP path in libraries_tests可能已有人在做 @CamWight 今天认领。 未关闭
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 75/100
bherbruck/solvecraft#1186 · 1 条评论 ·
-
area: screenshot audit bug good first issue priority: P3 security severity: info type: correctness
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 70/100
pierruno-labs/prowl#31 ·
-
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 70/100
limitlessprojects/Go-Hybrid#50 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复