Hacktoberfest 2026:維護者為十月標記出來的 issue,仍然開放、適合新手。 瀏覽 Hacktoberfest issue

fetch() and http.request() disagree when a lower-cased proxy env var is empty

未關閉
#66,202 4 則留言 0 個 reaction 已指派 0 人 在 GitHub 檢視

維護者通常 1 天內回覆

還沒有人認領這個 Issue。

評估

難度
4/5
預估耗時
3-5 天
新手友好度
45/100
Issue 類型
缺陷
描述清晰度
基本清楚
活躍度
活躍
技術堆疊
javascript, node.js

研究方向

Start by running the reproduction, then read the proxy selection in lib/internal/http.js and EnvHttpProxyAgent in deps/undici/src/lib/dispatcher/env-http-proxy-agent.js. Add a regression test around the usesProxy('request', env) and usesProxy('fetch', env) cases, and confirm both clients interpret empty proxy variables consistently after the intended behavior is decided.

由索引模型根據 Issue 內容生成。

描述

Version

v27.0.0-pre (main, 976a36a5b6c)

Platform
Linux 6.14.0-37-generic x64
Subsystem

http

What steps will reproduce the bug?

Run the script below with a build that has built-in proxy support.

It starts a proxy and an origin server, then launches a child process that sends one http.request() and one fetch() using the same proxy environment. The script reports whether each request went through the proxy.

'use strict';

const http = require('http');
const { spawn } = require('child_process');
const { once } = require('events');

const seen = [];

const proxy = http.createServer((req, res) => {
  seen.push(req.url);

  const url = new URL(req.url);
  http.request({
    hostname: url.hostname,
    port: url.port,
    path: url.pathname,
  })
    .on('response', (proxyRes) => proxyRes.pipe(res))
    .on('error', () => res.end())
    .end();
});

const server = http.createServer((req, res) => res.end('Hello world'));

const child = `
const url = process.env.REQUEST_URL;

require('http').get(url + 'request', (res) => {
  res.resume();

  res.on('end', () => {
    fetch(url + 'fetch')
      .then((r) => r.text())
      .then(
        () => process.exit(0),
        () => process.exit(0),
      );
  });
});
`;

(async () => {
  proxy.listen(0);
  server.listen(0);

  await Promise.all([
    once(proxy, 'listening'),
    once(server, 'listening'),
  ]);

  const PROXY = `http://localhost:${proxy.address().port}`;
  const REQUEST_URL = `http://localhost:${server.address().port}/`;

  const cases = [
    ['HTTP_PROXY only               ', {
      HTTP_PROXY: PROXY,
    }],
    ["http_proxy='' HTTP_PROXY=proxy", {
      http_proxy: '',
      HTTP_PROXY: PROXY,
    }],
    ["no_proxy='' NO_PROXY='*'      ", {
      HTTP_PROXY: PROXY,
      no_proxy: '',
      NO_PROXY: '*',
    }],
  ];

  for (const [name, env] of cases) {
    seen.length = 0;

    const childEnv = {
      ...process.env,
      NODE_USE_ENV_PROXY: '1',
      REQUEST_URL,
    };

    // Avoid inheriting proxy configuration from the machine running
    // the reproduction.
    for (const key of [
      'http_proxy',
      'HTTP_PROXY',
      'https_proxy',
      'HTTPS_PROXY',
      'no_proxy',
      'NO_PROXY',
    ]) {
      delete childEnv[key];
    }

    Object.assign(childEnv, env);

    const cp = spawn(process.execPath, ['-e', child], {
      env: childEnv,
      stdio: 'ignore',
    });

    await once(cp, 'exit');

    const via = (tag) =>
      seen.some((url) => url.endsWith('/' + tag)) ? 'proxy ' : 'direct';

    console.log(
      `${name}  http.request: ${via('request')}  fetch: ${via('fetch')}`,
    );
  }

  proxy.close();
  server.close();
})();
How often does it reproduce? Is there a required condition?

Every run.

It requires NODE_USE_ENV_PROXY=1 (or --use-env-proxy) and a lower-cased proxy variable set to the empty string while its upper-cased counterpart is set.

This does not apply to Windows, where environment variable names are case-insensitive.

What is the expected behavior? Why is that the expected behavior?

fetch() and http.request() should interpret the same proxy environment consistently when built-in proxy support is enabled.

Which interpretation of an empty lower-cased value should be used is a separate question. There are at least two existing behaviors in the ecosystem:

  • curl treats an empty lower-cased value as unset and can fall back to the upper-cased variable.
  • Python's urllib.getproxies_environment() treats an empty lower-cased value as an override that removes the upper-cased value.

Node.js currently implements both interpretations at once, depending on which client is used.

The HTTP documentation describes the lower-cased variables as, for example:

Same as HTTP_PROXY. If both are set, http_proxy takes precedence.

An explicitly present empty string makes the intended behavior here ambiguous.

What do you see instead?
HTTP_PROXY only                 http.request: proxy   fetch: proxy
http_proxy='' HTTP_PROXY=proxy  http.request: proxy   fetch: direct
no_proxy='' NO_PROXY='*'        http.request: direct  fetch: proxy

The last two cases disagree, in opposite directions.

Additional information

The built-in HTTP implementation uses || when selecting between lower- and upper-cased variables:

lib/internal/http.js#L206:

env.http_proxy || env.HTTP_PROXY

lib/internal/http.js#L237:

env.no_proxy || env.NO_PROXY

Therefore an empty lower-cased value is falsy and the upper-cased value wins.

Undici's EnvHttpProxyAgent, used by fetch() through setupHttpProxy(), uses nullish coalescing instead:

deps/undici/src/lib/dispatcher/env-http-proxy-agent.js#L26:

httpProxy ?? process.env.http_proxy ?? process.env.HTTP_PROXY

and for NO_PROXY:

deps/undici/src/lib/dispatcher/env-http-proxy-agent.js#L171:

process.env.no_proxy ?? process.env.NO_PROXY ?? ''

Therefore an empty lower-cased value wins on the Undici side.

The built-in behavior has been present since 036b1fd66d8 added proxy support to http.request() in v25.0.0. The reproduction above was only run against the stated build of main.

This appears related to #65616, where NO_PROXY matching also differs between fetch() and http.request().

It also relates directly to the still-open item in #57872:

Share code between the fetch and the http(s) builtin implementation (e.g. env var parsing & matching)

A regression test can demonstrate the inconsistency without deciding which interpretation is correct:

const viaRequest = await usesProxy('request', env);
const viaFetch = await usesProxy('fetch', env);

assert.strictEqual(viaFetch, viaRequest);

On current behavior, the empty http_proxy and empty no_proxy cases fail.

I would be happy to send a PR once it is decided which interpretation built-in proxy support should use consistently.

If the built-in HTTP behavior is preferred, the corresponding Undici behavior would need to be aligned upstream. If the Undici behavior is preferred, the || selections in lib/internal/http.js can be changed accordingly. The documentation should then specify how empty values are interpreted.

Refs: https://github.com/nodejs/node/issues/57872

主要語言
JavaScript
星號
122k
分支
38.4k
平均合併
3 天 22 小時
30 天內合併 PR
273

環境準備

從這裡開始

  1. 先讀完整個 Issue,再讀專案的貢獻指南。
  2. 在 Issue 下留言說明你要接手 —— 這能避免兩個人做同樣的事。
  3. Fork 儲存庫,在一個分支上完成修改。
  4. 送出 Pull Request,並在描述裡引用這個 Issue 編號。

nodejs/node 的其他 Issue

查看 nodejs/node 的全部 Issue

相似的 Issue

更多 JavaScript Issue

把新 issue 寄到你的電子郵件信箱

精選適合新手參與的 GitHub issue 摘要。