Hacktoberfest 2026: le issue che i maintainer hanno segnato per ottobre, aperte e adatte ai principianti. Sfoglia le issue Hacktoberfest

fetch() and http.request() disagree when a lower-cased proxy env var is empty

Aperta
#66,202 3 commenti 0 reazioni 0 assegnatari Vedi su GitHub

Nessuno ha ancora preso questa issue.

Valutazione

Difficoltà
4/5
Tempo stimato
3-5 giorni
Idoneità per principianti
45/100
Tipo di issue
Bug
Chiarezza
Abbastanza chiara
Stato di attività
Attiva
Stack tecnologico
javascript, node.js

Direzione di ricerca

Start by running the reproduction, then read the proxy selection in lib/internal/http.js and EnvHttpProxyAgent in deps/undici/src/lib/dispatcher/env-http-proxy-agent.js. Add a regression test around the usesProxy('request', env) and usesProxy('fetch', env) cases, and confirm both clients interpret empty proxy variables consistently after the intended behavior is decided.

Scritto dal modello di indicizzazione a partire dal testo della issue.

Descrizione

Version

v27.0.0-pre (main, 976a36a5b6c)

Platform
Linux 6.14.0-37-generic x64
Subsystem

http

What steps will reproduce the bug?

Run the script below with a build that has built-in proxy support.

It starts a proxy and an origin server, then launches a child process that sends one http.request() and one fetch() using the same proxy environment. The script reports whether each request went through the proxy.

'use strict';

const http = require('http');
const { spawn } = require('child_process');
const { once } = require('events');

const seen = [];

const proxy = http.createServer((req, res) => {
  seen.push(req.url);

  const url = new URL(req.url);
  http.request({
    hostname: url.hostname,
    port: url.port,
    path: url.pathname,
  })
    .on('response', (proxyRes) => proxyRes.pipe(res))
    .on('error', () => res.end())
    .end();
});

const server = http.createServer((req, res) => res.end('Hello world'));

const child = `
const url = process.env.REQUEST_URL;

require('http').get(url + 'request', (res) => {
  res.resume();

  res.on('end', () => {
    fetch(url + 'fetch')
      .then((r) => r.text())
      .then(
        () => process.exit(0),
        () => process.exit(0),
      );
  });
});
`;

(async () => {
  proxy.listen(0);
  server.listen(0);

  await Promise.all([
    once(proxy, 'listening'),
    once(server, 'listening'),
  ]);

  const PROXY = `http://localhost:${proxy.address().port}`;
  const REQUEST_URL = `http://localhost:${server.address().port}/`;

  const cases = [
    ['HTTP_PROXY only               ', {
      HTTP_PROXY: PROXY,
    }],
    ["http_proxy='' HTTP_PROXY=proxy", {
      http_proxy: '',
      HTTP_PROXY: PROXY,
    }],
    ["no_proxy='' NO_PROXY='*'      ", {
      HTTP_PROXY: PROXY,
      no_proxy: '',
      NO_PROXY: '*',
    }],
  ];

  for (const [name, env] of cases) {
    seen.length = 0;

    const childEnv = {
      ...process.env,
      NODE_USE_ENV_PROXY: '1',
      REQUEST_URL,
    };

    // Avoid inheriting proxy configuration from the machine running
    // the reproduction.
    for (const key of [
      'http_proxy',
      'HTTP_PROXY',
      'https_proxy',
      'HTTPS_PROXY',
      'no_proxy',
      'NO_PROXY',
    ]) {
      delete childEnv[key];
    }

    Object.assign(childEnv, env);

    const cp = spawn(process.execPath, ['-e', child], {
      env: childEnv,
      stdio: 'ignore',
    });

    await once(cp, 'exit');

    const via = (tag) =>
      seen.some((url) => url.endsWith('/' + tag)) ? 'proxy ' : 'direct';

    console.log(
      `${name}  http.request: ${via('request')}  fetch: ${via('fetch')}`,
    );
  }

  proxy.close();
  server.close();
})();
How often does it reproduce? Is there a required condition?

Every run.

It requires NODE_USE_ENV_PROXY=1 (or --use-env-proxy) and a lower-cased proxy variable set to the empty string while its upper-cased counterpart is set.

This does not apply to Windows, where environment variable names are case-insensitive.

What is the expected behavior? Why is that the expected behavior?

fetch() and http.request() should interpret the same proxy environment consistently when built-in proxy support is enabled.

Which interpretation of an empty lower-cased value should be used is a separate question. There are at least two existing behaviors in the ecosystem:

  • curl treats an empty lower-cased value as unset and can fall back to the upper-cased variable.
  • Python's urllib.getproxies_environment() treats an empty lower-cased value as an override that removes the upper-cased value.

Node.js currently implements both interpretations at once, depending on which client is used.

The HTTP documentation describes the lower-cased variables as, for example:

Same as HTTP_PROXY. If both are set, http_proxy takes precedence.

An explicitly present empty string makes the intended behavior here ambiguous.

What do you see instead?
HTTP_PROXY only                 http.request: proxy   fetch: proxy
http_proxy='' HTTP_PROXY=proxy  http.request: proxy   fetch: direct
no_proxy='' NO_PROXY='*'        http.request: direct  fetch: proxy

The last two cases disagree, in opposite directions.

Additional information

The built-in HTTP implementation uses || when selecting between lower- and upper-cased variables:

lib/internal/http.js#L206:

env.http_proxy || env.HTTP_PROXY

lib/internal/http.js#L237:

env.no_proxy || env.NO_PROXY

Therefore an empty lower-cased value is falsy and the upper-cased value wins.

Undici's EnvHttpProxyAgent, used by fetch() through setupHttpProxy(), uses nullish coalescing instead:

deps/undici/src/lib/dispatcher/env-http-proxy-agent.js#L26:

httpProxy ?? process.env.http_proxy ?? process.env.HTTP_PROXY

and for NO_PROXY:

deps/undici/src/lib/dispatcher/env-http-proxy-agent.js#L171:

process.env.no_proxy ?? process.env.NO_PROXY ?? ''

Therefore an empty lower-cased value wins on the Undici side.

The built-in behavior has been present since 036b1fd66d8 added proxy support to http.request() in v25.0.0. The reproduction above was only run against the stated build of main.

This appears related to #65616, where NO_PROXY matching also differs between fetch() and http.request().

It also relates directly to the still-open item in #57872:

Share code between the fetch and the http(s) builtin implementation (e.g. env var parsing & matching)

A regression test can demonstrate the inconsistency without deciding which interpretation is correct:

const viaRequest = await usesProxy('request', env);
const viaFetch = await usesProxy('fetch', env);

assert.strictEqual(viaFetch, viaRequest);

On current behavior, the empty http_proxy and empty no_proxy cases fail.

I would be happy to send a PR once it is decided which interpretation built-in proxy support should use consistently.

If the built-in HTTP behavior is preferred, the corresponding Undici behavior would need to be aligned upstream. If the Undici behavior is preferred, the || selections in lib/internal/http.js can be changed accordingly. The documentation should then specify how empty values are interpreted.

Refs: https://github.com/nodejs/node/issues/57872

Lingua principale
JavaScript
Stelle
122k
Fork
37.4k
Merge medio
4g 4h
PR unite (30g)
276

Guida per i contributori

Apri la guida per i contributori

Come iniziare

  1. Leggi tutta la issue e poi la guida ai contributi del progetto.
  2. Commenta sulla issue per dire che te ne occupi tu — evita che due persone facciano lo stesso lavoro.
  3. Fai un fork del repository e lavora su un branch.
  4. Apri una pull request che faccia riferimento al numero della issue.

Altre issue di nodejs/node

Tutte le issue di nodejs/node

Issue simili

Altre issue su JavaScript

Ricevi le nuove issue nella tua casella

Un breve riepilogo di issue GitHub adatte ai principianti.