Hacktoberfest 2026: những issue maintainer đã đánh dấu cho tháng Mười, đang mở và phù hợp người mới. Xem issue Hacktoberfest

fetch() and http.request() disagree when a lower-cased proxy env var is empty

Đang mở
#66,202 3 bình luận 0 reaction 0 người được giao Xem trên GitHub

Chưa có ai nhận issue này.

Đánh giá

Độ khó
4/5
Thời gian dự kiến
3-5 ngày
Mức phù hợp với người mới
45/100
Loại issue
Lỗi
Độ rõ ràng
Khá rõ ràng
Mức độ hoạt động
Sôi nổi
Công nghệ
javascript, node.js
Lĩnh vực
backend, networking

Hướng nghiên cứu

Start by running the reproduction, then read the proxy selection in lib/internal/http.js and EnvHttpProxyAgent in deps/undici/src/lib/dispatcher/env-http-proxy-agent.js. Add a regression test around the usesProxy('request', env) and usesProxy('fetch', env) cases, and confirm both clients interpret empty proxy variables consistently after the intended behavior is decided.

Do mô hình lập chỉ mục viết ra từ nội dung của issue.

Mô tả

Version

v27.0.0-pre (main, 976a36a5b6c)

Platform
Linux 6.14.0-37-generic x64
Subsystem

http

What steps will reproduce the bug?

Run the script below with a build that has built-in proxy support.

It starts a proxy and an origin server, then launches a child process that sends one http.request() and one fetch() using the same proxy environment. The script reports whether each request went through the proxy.

'use strict';

const http = require('http');
const { spawn } = require('child_process');
const { once } = require('events');

const seen = [];

const proxy = http.createServer((req, res) => {
  seen.push(req.url);

  const url = new URL(req.url);
  http.request({
    hostname: url.hostname,
    port: url.port,
    path: url.pathname,
  })
    .on('response', (proxyRes) => proxyRes.pipe(res))
    .on('error', () => res.end())
    .end();
});

const server = http.createServer((req, res) => res.end('Hello world'));

const child = `
const url = process.env.REQUEST_URL;

require('http').get(url + 'request', (res) => {
  res.resume();

  res.on('end', () => {
    fetch(url + 'fetch')
      .then((r) => r.text())
      .then(
        () => process.exit(0),
        () => process.exit(0),
      );
  });
});
`;

(async () => {
  proxy.listen(0);
  server.listen(0);

  await Promise.all([
    once(proxy, 'listening'),
    once(server, 'listening'),
  ]);

  const PROXY = `http://localhost:${proxy.address().port}`;
  const REQUEST_URL = `http://localhost:${server.address().port}/`;

  const cases = [
    ['HTTP_PROXY only               ', {
      HTTP_PROXY: PROXY,
    }],
    ["http_proxy='' HTTP_PROXY=proxy", {
      http_proxy: '',
      HTTP_PROXY: PROXY,
    }],
    ["no_proxy='' NO_PROXY='*'      ", {
      HTTP_PROXY: PROXY,
      no_proxy: '',
      NO_PROXY: '*',
    }],
  ];

  for (const [name, env] of cases) {
    seen.length = 0;

    const childEnv = {
      ...process.env,
      NODE_USE_ENV_PROXY: '1',
      REQUEST_URL,
    };

    // Avoid inheriting proxy configuration from the machine running
    // the reproduction.
    for (const key of [
      'http_proxy',
      'HTTP_PROXY',
      'https_proxy',
      'HTTPS_PROXY',
      'no_proxy',
      'NO_PROXY',
    ]) {
      delete childEnv[key];
    }

    Object.assign(childEnv, env);

    const cp = spawn(process.execPath, ['-e', child], {
      env: childEnv,
      stdio: 'ignore',
    });

    await once(cp, 'exit');

    const via = (tag) =>
      seen.some((url) => url.endsWith('/' + tag)) ? 'proxy ' : 'direct';

    console.log(
      `${name}  http.request: ${via('request')}  fetch: ${via('fetch')}`,
    );
  }

  proxy.close();
  server.close();
})();
How often does it reproduce? Is there a required condition?

Every run.

It requires NODE_USE_ENV_PROXY=1 (or --use-env-proxy) and a lower-cased proxy variable set to the empty string while its upper-cased counterpart is set.

This does not apply to Windows, where environment variable names are case-insensitive.

What is the expected behavior? Why is that the expected behavior?

fetch() and http.request() should interpret the same proxy environment consistently when built-in proxy support is enabled.

Which interpretation of an empty lower-cased value should be used is a separate question. There are at least two existing behaviors in the ecosystem:

  • curl treats an empty lower-cased value as unset and can fall back to the upper-cased variable.
  • Python's urllib.getproxies_environment() treats an empty lower-cased value as an override that removes the upper-cased value.

Node.js currently implements both interpretations at once, depending on which client is used.

The HTTP documentation describes the lower-cased variables as, for example:

Same as HTTP_PROXY. If both are set, http_proxy takes precedence.

An explicitly present empty string makes the intended behavior here ambiguous.

What do you see instead?
HTTP_PROXY only                 http.request: proxy   fetch: proxy
http_proxy='' HTTP_PROXY=proxy  http.request: proxy   fetch: direct
no_proxy='' NO_PROXY='*'        http.request: direct  fetch: proxy

The last two cases disagree, in opposite directions.

Additional information

The built-in HTTP implementation uses || when selecting between lower- and upper-cased variables:

lib/internal/http.js#L206:

env.http_proxy || env.HTTP_PROXY

lib/internal/http.js#L237:

env.no_proxy || env.NO_PROXY

Therefore an empty lower-cased value is falsy and the upper-cased value wins.

Undici's EnvHttpProxyAgent, used by fetch() through setupHttpProxy(), uses nullish coalescing instead:

deps/undici/src/lib/dispatcher/env-http-proxy-agent.js#L26:

httpProxy ?? process.env.http_proxy ?? process.env.HTTP_PROXY

and for NO_PROXY:

deps/undici/src/lib/dispatcher/env-http-proxy-agent.js#L171:

process.env.no_proxy ?? process.env.NO_PROXY ?? ''

Therefore an empty lower-cased value wins on the Undici side.

The built-in behavior has been present since 036b1fd66d8 added proxy support to http.request() in v25.0.0. The reproduction above was only run against the stated build of main.

This appears related to #65616, where NO_PROXY matching also differs between fetch() and http.request().

It also relates directly to the still-open item in #57872:

Share code between the fetch and the http(s) builtin implementation (e.g. env var parsing & matching)

A regression test can demonstrate the inconsistency without deciding which interpretation is correct:

const viaRequest = await usesProxy('request', env);
const viaFetch = await usesProxy('fetch', env);

assert.strictEqual(viaFetch, viaRequest);

On current behavior, the empty http_proxy and empty no_proxy cases fail.

I would be happy to send a PR once it is decided which interpretation built-in proxy support should use consistently.

If the built-in HTTP behavior is preferred, the corresponding Undici behavior would need to be aligned upstream. If the Undici behavior is preferred, the || selections in lib/internal/http.js can be changed accordingly. The documentation should then specify how empty values are interpreted.

Refs: https://github.com/nodejs/node/issues/57872

Ngôn ngữ chính
JavaScript
Star
122k
Fork
37.4k
Merge trung bình
4 ngày 3 giờ
Pull request đã merge (30 ngày)
279

Hướng dẫn đóng góp

Mở hướng dẫn đóng góp

Bắt đầu từ đâu

  1. Đọc hết issue, rồi đọc hướng dẫn đóng góp của dự án.
  2. Bình luận trên issue rằng bạn sẽ nhận — tránh hai người làm cùng một việc.
  3. Fork repository và làm thay đổi trên một nhánh.
  4. Mở pull request có tham chiếu số hiệu của issue.

Issue khác của nodejs/node

Tất cả issue của nodejs/node

Issue tương tự

Thêm issue về JavaScript

Nhận issue mới trong hộp thư của bạn

Bản tóm tắt ngắn những issue GitHub phù hợp với người mới.