Re-evaluate need for the different "containered" builds that we do
維護者通常 1 天內回覆
還沒有人認領這個 Issue。
評估
- 難度
- 5/5
- 預估耗時
- 一週以上
- 新手友好度
- 25/100
- Issue 類型
- 重構
- 描述清晰度
- 基本清楚
- 活躍度
- 活躍
- 技術堆疊
- github, node.js
- 領域
- ci-cd, infrastructure
研究方向
Start by reviewing the listed containered build axes in the node-test-commit-linux-containered job, then compare how the Windows and ARM debug jobs run on PRs. Read the linked build issue about ARM container space for context. The issue is resolved when the discussion reaches a decision on which axes and debug builds to retain, move to daily runs, or change platforms.
由索引模型根據 Issue 內容生成。
描述
In node-test-commit-linux-containered we have the following build which are done on PRs (not necessatily all on each node version):
- ubi81_sharedlibs_openssl111fips_x64
- ubuntu2404_sharedlibs_debug_x64
- ubuntu2404_sharedlibs_icu_x64
- ubuntu2404_sharedlibs_openssl111_x64
- ubuntu2404_sharedlibs_openssl30_x64
- ubuntu2404_sharedlibs_openssl35_x64
- ubuntu2404_sharedlibs_openssl40_x64
- ubuntu2404_sharedlibs_shared_x64
- ubuntu2404_sharedlibs_smallicu_x64
- ubuntu2404_sharedlibs_withoutintl_x64
- ubuntu2404_sharedlibs_withoutssl_x64
- ubuntu2404_sharedlibs_zlib_x64
We should use this issue to discuss whether this is a suitable set of axis to build on.
A similar discussion should be had on the debug variants that we build for i.e. the node-compile-windows-debug and node-test-commit-arm-debug jobs. Do we still need those on every PR? It may be worth moving one or both of those to "daily" only. It's probably also worth trying to move the arm debug one back to x64 since that was mostly done for when we had the large equinix systems. The limited amount of space we have on the arm containered machines (I was looking at that recently in https://github.com/nodejs/build/issues/4534)
Two thoughts:
- Is Ubuntu 24.04 the most suitable platform to do all of these on?
- Could we have one "shared everything" axis which builds node as a shared library and also dynamically links to system shared libraries for SSL/ICU/zlib/anything else that we support on the system so we do them all together - and maybe have one older and one newer distribution to cover the ends of the spectrum (e.g. RHEL8 and Fedora latest? Those could be split over two architectures for additional coverage)
- 主要語言
- Jinja
- 星號
- 544
- 分支
- 184
- 平均合併
- 3 天 12 小時
- 30 天內合併 PR
- 7
環境準備
- 沒有 Dockerfile 或 Docker Compose 檔案
- 沒有 Pull Request 範本
- 閱讀貢獻指南
從這裡開始
- 先讀完整個 Issue，再讀專案的貢獻指南。
- 在 Issue 下留言說明你要接手 —— 這能避免兩個人做同樣的事。
- Fork 儲存庫，在一個分支上完成修改。
- 送出 Pull Request，並在描述裡引用這個 Issue 編號。
nodejs/build 的其他 Issue
-
ci-job-request
難度 2/5 1-3 小時 新手友好度 65/100
nodejs/build#4539 · 1 則留言 · 1 個 reaction ·
維護者通常 1 天內回覆
-
Python 3.10 EOL 2026-10-01 used in Windows可能已有人在做 @MikeMcC399 於 3 天前認領。 未關閉build-agenda
難度 2/5 1-3 小時 新手友好度 65/100
維護者通常 1 天內回覆
-
難度 2/5 1-3 小時 新手友好度 72/100
維護者通常 1 天內回覆
-
難度 1/5 1 小時以內 新手友好度 1/100
維護者通常 1 天內回覆
-
難度 4/5 1-2 天 新手友好度 47/100
維護者通常 1 天內回覆
相似的 Issue
-
難度 2/5 1-3 小時 新手友好度 78/100
維護者通常 2 天內回覆
-
enhancement
難度 2/5 1-3 小時 新手友好度 72/100
-
難度 2/5 1-3 小時 新手友好度 78/100
-
難度 2/5 1-3 小時 新手友好度 78/100
維護者通常 1 天內回覆
-
[guide] AGENTS.md claims the coverage gate, e2e and full lint run on every PR after ADR 0011 focused validation可能已有人在做 @hivecommons-hive 今天認領。 未關閉agent/guide documentation hive/claimed-by-guide stage/040-covered-by-pr
難度 2/5 1-3 小時 新手友好度 81/100
維護者通常 1 天內回覆