FileArtifactService changes CRLF and CR line endings in text artifacts

未關閉 適合新手
  • 哪裡不對？
#7,914 1 則留言 0 個 reaction 已指派 1 人 在 GitHub 檢視

維護者通常 4 天內回覆

@sanketpatil06 已經在處理了。

開始於 2026年11月2日。

  • #7915 來自 @emme1t —— 未關閉
  • #7917 來自 @TINGyu123644 —— 已關閉，未合併

評估

難度
2/5
預估耗時
1-3 小時
新手友好度
85/100
Issue 類型
缺陷
描述清晰度
描述清楚
活躍度
活躍
技術堆疊
python
領域
backend

研究方向

從 google/adk/artifacts/file_artifact_service.py 開始，追蹤文字的儲存與載入方式；issue 的重現指令碼展示了需要檢查的換行情況。執行該指令碼，接著確認以檔案為基礎的 artifact 傳回的已儲存文字保持不變，包括 CRLF 和單獨的 CR 行結尾。

由索引模型根據 Issue 內容生成。

描述

request clarification services

🔴 Required Information

Describe the Bug:

FileArtifactService changes the line endings of text artifacts. A text artifact containing \r\n or a lone \r loads back with \n in their place. The payload is read with Path.read_text, whose universal newline mode rewrites both. It is written with Path.write_text, which translates \n to os.linesep, so on Windows every \n is stored as \r\n.

InMemoryArtifactService and GcsArtifactService return the saved text unchanged, so the same artifact differs only on the file backend. That backend is what adk web and adk run use by default (use_local_storage=True, via create_local_artifact_service). CSV files (RFC 4180 uses CRLF), patches, and Windows-authored text a tool saves therefore load back different from what was saved.

Steps to Reproduce:

  1. pip install google-adk (reproduced on main at 8cd3b12c8)
  2. Run:
import asyncio, tempfile
from google.genai import types
from google.adk.artifacts.file_artifact_service import FileArtifactService
from google.adk.artifacts.in_memory_artifact_service import InMemoryArtifactService

async def main():
  text = "id,name\r\n1,a\r\n2,b\rc\n"
  for svc in (FileArtifactService(root_dir=tempfile.mkdtemp()), InMemoryArtifactService()):
    await svc.save_artifact(app_name="a", user_id="u", session_id="s",
                            filename="t.csv", artifact=types.Part(text=text))
    got = await svc.load_artifact(app_name="a", user_id="u", session_id="s",
                                  filename="t.csv")
    print(type(svc).__name__, repr(got.text), got.text == text)

asyncio.run(main())

Expected Behavior:

Both services return the saved text unchanged.

Observed Behavior:

FileArtifactService 'id,name\n1,a\n2,b\nc\n' False
InMemoryArtifactService 'id,name\r\n1,a\r\n2,b\rc\n' True

Environment Details:

  • ADK Library Version (pip show google-adk): 2.13.0 (main at 8cd3b12c8)
  • Desktop OS: macOS (the read-side rewrite is platform independent; the write-side translation affects Windows)
  • Python Version (python -V): 3.11

Model Information:

  • Are you using LiteLLM: No
  • Which model is being used: N/A (artifact service only)

🟡 Optional Information

Regression:

Not that I know of. The file backend has read and written text payloads with read_text / write_text.

Additional Context:

I would like to contribute a focused fix for this. Would writing artifact.text.encode("utf-8") with write_bytes and decoding read_bytes() on load be an acceptable approach? This keeps the stored payload exactly equal to the saved text. The error handling stays the same (OSError / UnicodeDecodeError are still caught and logged). Metadata JSON reads and writes are unaffected, since JSON escapes CR/LF inside strings.

How often has this issue occurred?:

  • Always (100%)
主要語言
Python
星號
22.1k
分支
4.3k
平均合併
1 天 10 小時
30 天內合併 PR
5

環境準備

從這裡開始

  1. 先讀完整個 Issue，再讀專案的貢獻指南。
  2. 在 Issue 下留言說明你要接手 —— 這能避免兩個人做同樣的事。
  3. Fork 儲存庫，在一個分支上完成修改。
  4. 送出 Pull Request，並在描述裡引用這個 Issue 編號。

google/adk-python 的其他 Issue

查看 google/adk-python 的全部 Issue

相似的 Issue

更多 Python Issue

把新 issue 寄到你的電子郵件信箱

精選適合新手參與的 GitHub issue 摘要。