routing.headers cannot set Cache-Control on static assets
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Newbie friendliness
- 56/100
- Issue type
- Bug
- Clarity
- Clearly specified
- Activity status
- Active
- Tech stack
- typescript
- Domain
- backend
Research direction
Start by reading headerMiddleware in dist/runtime/routing.mjs, then inspect stampClientAssetCachePolicy and the routing runtime tests. Reproduce the CSS and JS behavior with vp build and vp preview, and check how the fix affects 404 responses. Done means the acceptance checklist passes in preview and Cloudflare deploy, with tests and docs covering the 404 policy.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
routing.headers cannot set Cache-Control on static assets
What happens
With Void 1.1.12 (the runtime code is the same in 1.2.1), this rule has no effect on static assets:
routing: {
headers: {
'/assets/*': ['Cache-Control: public, max-age=31536000, immutable'],
},
},
A CSS file, a font or an image under /assets/ still answers cache-control: public, max-age=0, must-revalidate. Other headers in the same rule, such as X-Robots-Tag, do arrive.
The rule also makes JavaScript worse. stampClientAssetCachePolicy removes immutableFiles for every chunk an authored Cache-Control pattern matches. So JS chunks lose the built-in immutable policy, and the authored policy never applies either.
The docs say the opposite should happen. guide/edge/headers.md says "User-defined Cache-Control overrides the built-in default", and guide/edge/static-assets.md suggests routing.headers for CSS and other assets.
Cause
headerMiddleware in dist/runtime/routing.mjs runs after next() and assigns a new response:
const headers = new Headers(c.res.headers);
for (const [name, value] of matched) headers.set(name, value);
c.res = new Response(c.res.body, { headers, status: c.res.status, statusText: c.res.statusText });
Hono's set res copies every header of the previous #res onto the new response, except content-type and set-cookie. The previous response is the asset binding's response, which carries cache-control: public, max-age=0, must-revalidate. That value overwrites the authored one. Headers the old response lacks, such as X-Robots-Tag, survive, which hides the bug.
Reproduce
- In a static Void app with
output: 'static', add the rule above. - Run
vp build, thenvp preview. - Run
curl -s -D - -o /dev/null http://127.0.0.1:<port>/assets/<any>.css. The response showscache-control: public, max-age=0, must-revalidate. - Request a JS chunk the same way. It now also shows
max-age=0, must-revalidate, where it showedimmutablebefore the rule was added.
Fix we apply locally
Clear the context's response before you assign the new one, so Hono has nothing to merge:
const response = new Response(c.res.body, { headers, status: c.res.status, statusText: c.res.statusText });
c.res = void 0;
c.res = response;
Aureum carries this as patches/void.patch.
Also worth deciding
Header rules apply to every status. With the fix in place, /assets/missing.css answers 404 with immutable, so a browser can cache the 404 for a year. A deploy that briefly serves new HTML from one version and assets from another could leave a visitor with a stylesheet that stays broken. Consider applying authored Cache-Control to successful responses only, or document that it applies to every status.
Acceptance checklist
- A
routing.headersrule that setsCache-Controlfor/assets/*reaches CSS, font and image responses invp previewand in a Cloudflare deploy. - JS chunks under the same pattern answer with the authored
Cache-Control. - Pages and other paths the rule does not match keep their default
Cache-Control. - A test in the routing runtime covers an authored header that the asset response already carries.
- The docs state whether authored
Cache-Controlapplies to 404 responses.
- Dominant language
- TypeScript
- Stars
- 580
- Forks
- 56
- Avg merge
- 11h 32m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 158
Getting set up
This project ships no dev container, Dockerfile or contributing guide, so setting up is up to you: start from its README, and see our first-contribution guide for the general steps.
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from voidzero-dev/void
-
Difficulty 5/5 Over a week Newbie friendliness 42/100
voidzero-dev/void#638 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
Difficulty 3/5 1-2 days Newbie friendliness 57/100
voidzero-dev/void#636 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
Difficulty 3/5 1-2 days Newbie friendliness 67/100
voidzero-dev/void#635 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
Difficulty 4/5 3-5 days Newbie friendliness 48/100
voidzero-dev/void#627 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
Difficulty 4/5 3-5 days Newbie friendliness 48/100
voidzero-dev/void#619 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
All issues in voidzero-dev/void
Similar issues
-
Shell: serve the home app's Cookie Policy on a hard reloadPossibly taken @2001anshkaushik claimed this today. Openfeature module:ai
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 88/100
rocketride-org/rocketride-server#2899 · 1 comment ·
Maintainers usually reply within 2 days
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 72/100
wazuh/wazuh-dashboard-plugins#9551 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 68/100
gofish-graphics/gofish-graphics#1252 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
optimization P3 size:XS
Difficulty 1/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 88/100
josephfung/curia#2366 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
type:bug
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 65/100
nightgauge/nightgauge#2688 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day