routing.headers cannot set Cache-Control on static assets
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
Nadie ha tomado este issue todavía.
Evaluación
- Dificultad
- 4/5
- Tiempo estimado
- 3-5 días
- Aptitud para principiantes
- 56/100
- Tipo de issue
- Error
- Claridad
- Bien especificado
- Estado de actividad
- Activo
- Stack tecnológico
- typescript
- Área
- backend
Línea de trabajo
Start by reading headerMiddleware in dist/runtime/routing.mjs, then inspect stampClientAssetCachePolicy and the routing runtime tests. Reproduce the CSS and JS behavior with vp build and vp preview, and check how the fix affects 404 responses. Done means the acceptance checklist passes in preview and Cloudflare deploy, with tests and docs covering the 404 policy.
Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.
Descripción
routing.headers cannot set Cache-Control on static assets
What happens
With Void 1.1.12 (the runtime code is the same in 1.2.1), this rule has no effect on static assets:
routing: {
headers: {
'/assets/*': ['Cache-Control: public, max-age=31536000, immutable'],
},
},
A CSS file, a font or an image under /assets/ still answers cache-control: public, max-age=0, must-revalidate. Other headers in the same rule, such as X-Robots-Tag, do arrive.
The rule also makes JavaScript worse. stampClientAssetCachePolicy removes immutableFiles for every chunk an authored Cache-Control pattern matches. So JS chunks lose the built-in immutable policy, and the authored policy never applies either.
The docs say the opposite should happen. guide/edge/headers.md says "User-defined Cache-Control overrides the built-in default", and guide/edge/static-assets.md suggests routing.headers for CSS and other assets.
Cause
headerMiddleware in dist/runtime/routing.mjs runs after next() and assigns a new response:
const headers = new Headers(c.res.headers);
for (const [name, value] of matched) headers.set(name, value);
c.res = new Response(c.res.body, { headers, status: c.res.status, statusText: c.res.statusText });
Hono's set res copies every header of the previous #res onto the new response, except content-type and set-cookie. The previous response is the asset binding's response, which carries cache-control: public, max-age=0, must-revalidate. That value overwrites the authored one. Headers the old response lacks, such as X-Robots-Tag, survive, which hides the bug.
Reproduce
- In a static Void app with
output: 'static', add the rule above. - Run
vp build, thenvp preview. - Run
curl -s -D - -o /dev/null http://127.0.0.1:<port>/assets/<any>.css. The response showscache-control: public, max-age=0, must-revalidate. - Request a JS chunk the same way. It now also shows
max-age=0, must-revalidate, where it showedimmutablebefore the rule was added.
Fix we apply locally
Clear the context's response before you assign the new one, so Hono has nothing to merge:
const response = new Response(c.res.body, { headers, status: c.res.status, statusText: c.res.statusText });
c.res = void 0;
c.res = response;
Aureum carries this as patches/void.patch.
Also worth deciding
Header rules apply to every status. With the fix in place, /assets/missing.css answers 404 with immutable, so a browser can cache the 404 for a year. A deploy that briefly serves new HTML from one version and assets from another could leave a visitor with a stylesheet that stays broken. Consider applying authored Cache-Control to successful responses only, or document that it applies to every status.
Acceptance checklist
- A
routing.headersrule that setsCache-Controlfor/assets/*reaches CSS, font and image responses invp previewand in a Cloudflare deploy. - JS chunks under the same pattern answer with the authored
Cache-Control. - Pages and other paths the rule does not match keep their default
Cache-Control. - A test in the routing runtime covers an authored header that the asset response already carries.
- The docs state whether authored
Cache-Controlapplies to 404 responses.
- Lenguaje dominante
- TypeScript
- Estrellas
- 580
- Forks
- 56
- Merge medio
- 11 h 28 min
- PR fusionados (30 d)
- 150
Preparar el entorno
Este proyecto no incluye contenedor de desarrollo, Dockerfile ni guía de contribución, así que la configuración corre por tu cuenta: empieza por su README y consulta nuestra guía para la primera contribución para los pasos generales.
Primeros pasos
- Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
- Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
- Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
- Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.
Más de voidzero-dev/void
-
Dificultad 4/5 3-5 días Aptitud para principiantes 48/100
voidzero-dev/void#619 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 5/5 Más de una semana Aptitud para principiantes 35/100
voidzero-dev/void#606 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
@void/react: client environment has no optimizeDeps.entries for pages, causing a dev re-optimization reload on first loadPosiblemente ocupada @0froq la tomó hoy. Abierto
Dificultad 3/5 1-2 días Aptitud para principiantes 66/100
voidzero-dev/void#599 · 1 comentario · 1 reacción ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
`void/log`: add `logger.child(fields)` to bind fields to every linePosiblemente ocupada @Dazzanova la tomó hoy. Abierto
Dificultad 3/5 1-2 días Aptitud para principiantes 82/100
voidzero-dev/void#596 · 1 comentario ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 3/5 1-2 días Aptitud para principiantes 55/100
voidzero-dev/void#573 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
Todos los issues de voidzero-dev/void
Issues similares
-
backend refactor
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 73/100
NIAEFEUP/tts#927 · 1 comentario · 1 reacción ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 82/100
callstackincubator/react-native-harness#296 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Editor bug with grouped nodesAbiertostatus:in-linear
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 67/100
n8n-io/n8n#42293 · 1 comentario ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
verified
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 67/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 5 días
-
Add inputmode attribute support (forwarded to the inner input)Quizá libre de nuevo Un pull request para esta issue se cerró sin fusionarse. Abiertoenhancement
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 68/100
Neovici/cosmoz-input#467 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día