routing.headers cannot set Cache-Control on static assets
Maintainer antworten meist innerhalb von 1 Tag
Dieses Issue hat noch niemand übernommen.
Bewertung
- Schwierigkeit
- 4/5
- Geschätzter Aufwand
- 3-5 Tage
- Anfängerfreundlichkeit
- 56/100
- Issue-Typ
- Bug
- Klarheit
- Klar beschrieben
- Aktivitätsstatus
- Aktiv
- Tech-Stack
- typescript
- Bereich
- backend
Rechercherichtung
Start by reading headerMiddleware in dist/runtime/routing.mjs, then inspect stampClientAssetCachePolicy and the routing runtime tests. Reproduce the CSS and JS behavior with vp build and vp preview, and check how the fix affects 404 responses. Done means the acceptance checklist passes in preview and Cloudflare deploy, with tests and docs covering the 404 policy.
Vom Indexierungsmodell aus dem Issue-Text verfasst.
Beschreibung
routing.headers cannot set Cache-Control on static assets
What happens
With Void 1.1.12 (the runtime code is the same in 1.2.1), this rule has no effect on static assets:
routing: {
headers: {
'/assets/*': ['Cache-Control: public, max-age=31536000, immutable'],
},
},
A CSS file, a font or an image under /assets/ still answers cache-control: public, max-age=0, must-revalidate. Other headers in the same rule, such as X-Robots-Tag, do arrive.
The rule also makes JavaScript worse. stampClientAssetCachePolicy removes immutableFiles for every chunk an authored Cache-Control pattern matches. So JS chunks lose the built-in immutable policy, and the authored policy never applies either.
The docs say the opposite should happen. guide/edge/headers.md says "User-defined Cache-Control overrides the built-in default", and guide/edge/static-assets.md suggests routing.headers for CSS and other assets.
Cause
headerMiddleware in dist/runtime/routing.mjs runs after next() and assigns a new response:
const headers = new Headers(c.res.headers);
for (const [name, value] of matched) headers.set(name, value);
c.res = new Response(c.res.body, { headers, status: c.res.status, statusText: c.res.statusText });
Hono's set res copies every header of the previous #res onto the new response, except content-type and set-cookie. The previous response is the asset binding's response, which carries cache-control: public, max-age=0, must-revalidate. That value overwrites the authored one. Headers the old response lacks, such as X-Robots-Tag, survive, which hides the bug.
Reproduce
- In a static Void app with
output: 'static', add the rule above. - Run
vp build, thenvp preview. - Run
curl -s -D - -o /dev/null http://127.0.0.1:<port>/assets/<any>.css. The response showscache-control: public, max-age=0, must-revalidate. - Request a JS chunk the same way. It now also shows
max-age=0, must-revalidate, where it showedimmutablebefore the rule was added.
Fix we apply locally
Clear the context's response before you assign the new one, so Hono has nothing to merge:
const response = new Response(c.res.body, { headers, status: c.res.status, statusText: c.res.statusText });
c.res = void 0;
c.res = response;
Aureum carries this as patches/void.patch.
Also worth deciding
Header rules apply to every status. With the fix in place, /assets/missing.css answers 404 with immutable, so a browser can cache the 404 for a year. A deploy that briefly serves new HTML from one version and assets from another could leave a visitor with a stylesheet that stays broken. Consider applying authored Cache-Control to successful responses only, or document that it applies to every status.
Acceptance checklist
- A
routing.headersrule that setsCache-Controlfor/assets/*reaches CSS, font and image responses invp previewand in a Cloudflare deploy. - JS chunks under the same pattern answer with the authored
Cache-Control. - Pages and other paths the rule does not match keep their default
Cache-Control. - A test in the routing runtime covers an authored header that the asset response already carries.
- The docs state whether authored
Cache-Controlapplies to 404 responses.
- Vorherrschende Sprache
- TypeScript
- Sterne
- 580
- Forks
- 56
- Ø Merge
- 12 Std. 25 Min.
- Gemergte PRs (30 T.)
- 134
Entwicklungsumgebung
Dieses Projekt bietet weder Dev-Container noch Dockerfile noch Beitragsleitfaden – die Einrichtung liegt bei Ihnen. Beginnen Sie mit der README; die allgemeinen Schritte stehen in unserem Leitfaden für den ersten Beitrag.
Erste Schritte
- Lesen Sie das ganze Issue und danach den Beitragsleitfaden des Projekts.
- Schreiben Sie ins Issue, dass Sie es übernehmen — das erspart doppelte Arbeit.
- Forken Sie das Repository und arbeiten Sie in einem Branch.
- Öffnen Sie einen Pull Request, der die Issue-Nummer nennt.
Mehr aus voidzero-dev/void
-
Schwierigkeit 3/5 1-2 Tage Anfängerfreundlichkeit 66/100
voidzero-dev/void#599 ·
Maintainer antworten meist innerhalb von 1 Tag
-
Schwierigkeit 3/5 1-2 Tage Anfängerfreundlichkeit 82/100
voidzero-dev/void#596 ·
Maintainer antworten meist innerhalb von 1 Tag
-
Schwierigkeit 3/5 1-2 Tage Anfängerfreundlichkeit 72/100
voidzero-dev/void#575 ·
Maintainer antworten meist innerhalb von 1 Tag
-
Schwierigkeit 3/5 1-2 Tage Anfängerfreundlichkeit 55/100
voidzero-dev/void#573 ·
Maintainer antworten meist innerhalb von 1 Tag
-
Schwierigkeit 4/5 3-5 Tage Anfängerfreundlichkeit 53/100
voidzero-dev/void#567 · 1 Reaktion ·
Maintainer antworten meist innerhalb von 1 Tag
Alle Issues in voidzero-dev/void
Ähnliche Issues
-
bug
Schwierigkeit 2/5 1-3 Stunden Anfängerfreundlichkeit 76/100
awslabs/visual-asset-management-system#804 ·
Maintainer antworten meist innerhalb von 1 Tag
-
Schwierigkeit 2/5 1-3 Stunden Anfängerfreundlichkeit 70/100
restatedev/sdk-typescript#813 ·
-
bug desktop P1 session XS
Schwierigkeit 2/5 1-3 Stunden Anfängerfreundlichkeit 82/100
Maintainer antworten meist innerhalb von 1 Tag
-
Schwierigkeit 2/5 1-3 Stunden Anfängerfreundlichkeit 62/100
Merit-Systems/x402scan#1312 ·
-
type:bug
Schwierigkeit 2/5 1-3 Stunden Anfängerfreundlichkeit 78/100
Azure/apiops-cli#331 ·
Maintainer antworten meist innerhalb von 3 Tagen