Hacktoberfest 2026: những issue maintainer đã đánh dấu cho tháng Mười, đang mở và phù hợp người mới. Xem issue Hacktoberfest

Make grad() an in-planner rewrite (via FFI) so it works inside any query — recursive CTEs, DML

Đang mở
#197 1 bình luận 1 reaction 0 người được giao Xem trên GitHub

Maintainer thường phản hồi trong vòng 1 ngày

Chưa có ai nhận issue này.

  • #205 của @JHON12091986 — đã đóng, không merge

Đánh giá

Độ khó
5/5
Thời gian dự kiến
Hơn một tuần
Mức phù hợp với người mới
25/100
Loại issue
Tính năng
Độ rõ ràng
Đặc tả rõ ràng
Mức độ hoạt động
Đình trệ
Công nghệ
python, rust, sql

Hướng nghiên cứu

Start by reading the autograd implementation and the DataFusion FFI UDF code in datafusion-ffi 52, especially datafusion/ffi/src/udf/mod.rs. The preferred direction is to forward ScalarUDFImpl::simplify across the FFI boundary, including a way to pass argument Expr values. Done means grad() can be rewritten inside recursive CTEs, DML, and scalar subqueries without the plan-level Substrait round trip.

Do mô hình lập chỉ mục viết ra từ nội dung của issue.

Mô tả

Context

The autograd grad() surface (#192) is applied by round-tripping the whole logical plan through Substrait: XarrayContext.sql() plans the query, produces a Substrait plan, the native extension (grad_rewrite) consumes it, rewrites every grad(...) into the differentiated expression, and re-produces Substrait for Python to execute.

This works for ordinary SELECT / aggregate / join plans, but Substrait can't represent every plan shape, so grad() can't appear inside:

  • Recursive CTEs — to_substrait_plan rejects RecursiveQuery (NotImplemented("Unsupported plan type: RecursiveQuery ...")). This is what blocks a fully-declarative training loop with grad inside the recursion.
  • DML — INSERT ... SELECT grad(...) doesn't convert (DML plans aren't produced to Substrait).
  • Scalar subqueries also don't convert (Cannot convert <subquery> to Substrait).

In the gradient-descent demo (#195) we worked around this with differentiate_sql (differentiate once to SQL text, then iterate it in a recursive CTE that contains no grad marker). That's a good pattern, but the original goal — grad() directly inside the query, including recursive/DML — needs an upstream change.

Root cause

The native engine is a separate cdylib that statically links its own copy of DataFusion, so it can't share Expr/LogicalPlan objects with datafusion-python — hence the Substrait serialization bridge. Substrait is then the limiting factor: any plan shape Substrait can't carry, grad() can't be rewritten in.

The fix is to stop round-tripping plans and instead run the rewrite in-planner, as a native DataFusion rewrite that fires for any query shape. That requires one of the following upstream capabilities.

Upstream changes that would enable it

Option 1 (preferred): datafusion-ffi — forward ScalarUDFImpl::simplify for foreign UDFs

If a foreign (FFI-registered) scalar UDF could implement simplify, grad/jvp/vjp would be self-rewriting UDFs: their simplify() differentiates the argument Expr during the SimplifyExpressions pass, which runs for every query shape (recursive CTEs, DML, subqueries) with no Substrait involved.

  • Today FFI_ScalarUDF / ForeignScalarUDF only forward name, signature, return_type/return_field_from_args, coerce_types, invoke_with_args (see datafusion/ffi/src/udf/mod.rs in datafusion-ffi 52) — not simplify, so the default (identity) is used.
  • Fix: add simplify to the FFI_ScalarUDF vtable (an extern "C" entry) and call it from ForeignScalarUDF::simplify. The hard part is passing the argument Exprs across the C ABI — needs an FFI representation of Expr (e.g. reuse datafusion-proto's Expr (de)serialization, or Substrait ExtendedExpression, for just the UDF's args). This is the smallest, most surgical change and unblocks all query shapes at once. It would also let us delete the whole plan-level Substrait bridge.
Option 2: datafusion-python + datafusion-ffi — register a foreign AnalyzerRule / FunctionRewrite over FFI

Expose registering a foreign analyzer/optimizer rule on the SessionContext (e.g. SessionContext.register_analyzer_rule(<capsule>)), backed by a new FFI_AnalyzerRule in datafusion-ffi. Then grad is an analyzer rule that rewrites grad(...) during analysis for any plan. Broader than Option 1 (general extension point) but more API surface.

Option 3 (narrower / long path): Substrait support for recursion + DML

Keep the current bridge but teach it the missing plan shapes:

  • DML: Substrait has a WriteRel; datafusion-substrait would need producer/consumer support for it so INSERT ... SELECT grad(...) round-trips.
  • Recursion: Substrait the spec has no recursive-relation construct, so this is an upstream substrait-io spec gap, not just a datafusion-substrait change — the longest path.

Recommendation

Pursue Option 1 (FFI simplify forwarding). It's the smallest upstream change, removes the Substrait round-trip and its codec complexity entirely, and makes grad() work inside recursive CTEs, DML, and subqueries — i.e. the fully-declarative training loop with grad in the query. Until then, differentiate_sql + a recursive CTE (see #195) is the supported way to express an in-SQL training loop.

Filed as a follow-up to the autograd feature (#192) and its demos (#195); related to the mutable-state discussion in #194.

Ngôn ngữ chính
Python
Star
142
Fork
19
Merge trung bình
1 ngày 9 giờ
Pull request đã merge (30 ngày)
9

Chuẩn bị môi trường

Bắt đầu từ đâu

  1. Đọc hết issue, rồi đọc hướng dẫn đóng góp của dự án.
  2. Bình luận trên issue rằng bạn sẽ nhận — tránh hai người làm cùng một việc.
  3. Fork repository và làm thay đổi trên một nhánh.
  4. Mở pull request có tham chiếu số hiệu của issue.

Issue khác của xqlsystems/xarray-sql

Tất cả issue của xqlsystems/xarray-sql

Issue tương tự

Thêm issue về Python

Nhận issue mới trong hộp thư của bạn

Bản tóm tắt ngắn những issue GitHub phù hợp với người mới.