Consider Nizlo indicators in Windows RMM Tool Execution detection

Open Beginner friendly
#4,401 0 comments 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Maintainers usually reply within 1 day

Nobody has claimed this yet.

Assessment

Difficulty
2/5
Estimated time
1-3 hours
Newbie friendliness
65/100
Issue type
Feature
Clarity
Clearly specified
Activity status
Active
Tech stack
python
Domain
security

Research direction

Read detections/endpoint/windows_rmm_tool_execution.yml and review the existing RMM identifiers and false-positive guidance. Compare the proposed company and image identifiers with the linked Nizlo indicator sources, then follow the repository’s contributor-agreement and validation workflow. Done means the analytic has the agreed narrow identifier update and retains its existing false-positive boundary.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Description

Suggested narrow update

Would you consider adding Nizlo's current Windows RMM identifiers to detections/endpoint/windows_rmm_tool_execution.yml?

The existing analytic already treats legitimate RMM execution as contextual evidence and warns about normal IT use. Nizlo is legitimate remote monitoring and management software, so a match should retain that same false-positive boundary and should not imply compromise by itself.

Source-backed identifiers:

  • Company: Cloud 84 Holdings, LLC (a bounded match such as Cloud 84 Holdings*)
  • Image: Nizlo.Agent.exe
  • Image: Nizlo.Agent.Updater.exe
  • Image: Nizlo.RemoteBridge.exe

Evidence:

The guide and CSV document the normal install locations and explicitly recommend correlating any hit with signer validity, path, authorization, parent process, command line, and surrounding activity. The current Windows installer is Authenticode-signed by CLOUD 84 HOLDINGS, LLC.

I am affiliated with Nizlo and am proposing this for defensive coverage, not as evidence that Nizlo is malicious. If the maintainers agree the scope belongs in this analytic, I can prepare the minimal YAML/version/date/reference update after satisfying Splunk's contributor-agreement requirement and the repository's validation workflow.

Dominant language
Python
Stars
1.7k
Forks
507
Avg merge
2d 17h
Merged PRs (30d)
35

Getting set up

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

More from splunk/security_content

All issues in splunk/security_content

Similar issues

More Python issues

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.