Adding ACP to Authorization Mechanisms in Solid Protocol
@timbl is already working on this.
Since Jul 22, 2022.
Assessment
This issue has not been assessed yet.
Description
Given that Access Control Policies have been accepted into the specification ecosystem and there are multiple implementations available, the question now becomes whether and how ACP is cited in the protocol specification itself, likely under the Authorization section.
Assuming that it is included in the Protocol's Authorization section, the next question becomes what is required for a server implementation to be conformant?
- A server MUST implement both ACP and WAC?
- A server MUST implement at least one of ACP or WAC?
- Dominant language
- HTML
- Stars
- 563
- Forks
- 110
- Avg merge
- 4d 13h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 3
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from solid/specification
-
new-work-item
Difficulty 5/5 Over a week Newbie friendliness 25/100
solid/specification#806 · 11 comments · 4 reactions ·
-
Difficulty 5/5 Over a week Newbie friendliness 30/100
solid/specification#804 · 9 comments · 1 reaction ·
-
Difficulty 5/5 Over a week Newbie friendliness 20/100
solid/specification#799 · 1 reaction ·
-
topic: resource access
Difficulty 5/5 Over a week Newbie friendliness 30/100
solid/specification#797 · 4 comments · 2 reactions ·
-
Difficulty 5/5 Over a week Newbie friendliness 25/100
solid/specification#788 · 4 comments · 1 reaction ·