Proposal: intent handover (login as + open resource)
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Newbie friendliness
- 20/100
- Issue type
- Feature
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Activity status
- Stale
- Domain
- api
Research direction
Start with pull request 798, which contains the first draft linked from this issue, then read the proposal describing cross-application intent handover. Done means producing a specification that lets other application builders implement the handover, including the example of logging in as a user and opening a resource.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
Hi all,
I've opened a pull request with a first draft:
https://github.com/solid/specification/pull/798
The idea is to make it possible for applications to signal intent to one another, so that I can pass information to a receiving application with information about what my user wants to do. For instance, I want to be able to signal 'please log in as this user and open this resource' to a text editor application.
I've shown a working demo of this on the 2026 Solid Symposium and would like to see if we can get this type of handover defined as a specification for other app builders to implement.
- Dominant language
- HTML
- Stars
- 563
- Forks
- 110
- Avg merge
- 4d 13h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 3
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from solid/specification
-
new-work-item
Difficulty 5/5 Over a week Newbie friendliness 25/100
solid/specification#806 · 11 comments · 4 reactions ·
-
Difficulty 5/5 Over a week Newbie friendliness 30/100
solid/specification#804 · 9 comments · 1 reaction ·
-
topic: resource access
Difficulty 5/5 Over a week Newbie friendliness 30/100
solid/specification#797 · 4 comments · 2 reactions ·
-
Difficulty 5/5 Over a week Newbie friendliness 25/100
solid/specification#788 · 4 comments · 1 reaction ·
-
Difficulty 5/5 Over a week Newbie friendliness 38/100
solid/specification#787 · 19 comments · 10 reactions ·
All issues in solid/specification
Similar issues
-
schema_dict_to_pydantic_model TypeError on JSON Schema type arrays → extract falls back to free-text Open
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 78/100
browser-use/browser-use#5904 ·
-
type: enhancement
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 68/100
ynput/ayon-python-api#363 ·
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 86/100
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 78/100
-
bug severity:low
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 78/100