Hacktoberfest 2026: as issues que os mantenedores marcaram para outubro, abertas e boas para iniciantes. Ver issues do Hacktoberfest

alternative server_method api

Aberta
#351 1 comentário 2 reações 0 responsáveis Ver no GitHub

Ninguém assumiu esta issue ainda.

Avaliação

Dificuldade
5/5
Tempo estimado
Mais de uma semana
Facilidade para iniciantes
25/100
Tipo de issue
Funcionalidade
Clareza
Precisa de esclarecimento
Status de atividade
Estagnada
Stack de tecnologia
rails, ruby
Domínio
api, backend

Direção de pesquisa

Comece rastreando o comportamento existente de server_methods e como as declarações em app/hyperstack/models e app/models são carregadas no cliente e no servidor. Defina o escopo de remote_access_to, dos blocos de segurança compartilhados, das definições exclusivas do servidor e de no_cache; em seguida, verifique se o comportamento existente dos métodos do servidor permanece intacto.

Escrita pelo modelo de indexação a partir do texto da issue.

Descrição

enhancement

given you have an existing model, which needs some of the methods to be defined as server_methods, it would be nice to say something like:

remote_access_to(:foo, :bar) { acting_user.admin? }

where foo and bar are existing instance methods.

or

remote_access_to(:foo, bar: 12) ...

which will give a default value of 12 to bar.

This is nice not only because it allows for existing methods to be declared as server methods without modification, but it also allows for a common security block to be provided, instead of repeating it. It also is a nicer separation of concerns.

Basic implementation is straight forward: On the client methods :foo and :bar are defined like any other server method, and will call the method with the security name prefix. On the server, the secured method calls the block, and if successfully returns true, continues on and calls the method.

There are complexities:

  1. if the remote_access_to declaration is placed BEFORE the definition of foo and bar, you have to make sure that those definitions are server only. It might be possible by redefining define_method, to check for this case...

  2. If foo and bar are server side only, then it would be nice if they could be declared in a file that is in app/models. This can be done by putting the server and client defs in app/hyperstack/models, and then putting server only defs in app/models and adding a require Rails.root.join('app', 'models', 'sample.rb') unless RUBY_ENGINE == 'opal' at the start of the file, and maybe with some hacking we could make a method called require_server_definitions that would automatically figure out the file being loaded, and then load the same file from app/models.

And a nice feature:

server_methods by default assume that they are returning a value, and thus will cache the value on the client once its retrieved. You can force a re-retrieval of the value by adding a ! to the method name. But in many cases you just want the method to be run on the server every time its called, anyway. So how about a no_cache parameter added to the server method args.

Linguagem predominante
JavaScript
Estrelas
538
Forks
41
Métricas de merge de PRs
Nenhum PR com merge em 30d

Guia de contribuição

Abrir o guia de contribuição

Primeiros passos

  1. Leia a issue inteira e depois o guia de contribuição do projeto.
  2. Comente na issue dizendo que vai assumir — evita que duas pessoas façam o mesmo trabalho.
  3. Faça um fork do repositório e trabalhe em uma branch.
  4. Abra um pull request que referencie o número da issue.

Mais de hyperstack-org/hyperstack

Todas as issues de hyperstack-org/hyperstack

Issues semelhantes

Mais issues de JavaScript

Receba novas issues na sua caixa de entrada

Um resumo curto de issues do GitHub para quem está começando.