analyze_issue_with_seer can't replace a completed Seer run

Aberta
  • Algo errado?
#2,273 1 comentário 0 reações 0 responsáveis Ver no GitHub

Mantenedores costumam responder em até 1 dia

Ninguém assumiu esta issue ainda.

Avaliação

Dificuldade
3/5
Tempo estimado
1-2 dias
Facilidade para iniciantes
68/100
Tipo de issue
Funcionalidade
Clareza
Claramente especificada
Status de atividade
Ativa
Stack de tecnologia
typescript
Domínio
tooling

Direção de pesquisa

Read packages/mcp-core/src/tools/catalog/analyze-issue-with-seer.ts around L149 (the startAutofix gate), L209-225 (the path that returns an existing terminal run), and the input schema at L83-92 with its Results are cached description at L80. Check the related getsentry/toolkit#1270 runId guard before changing the branch, since the new parameter has to coexist with it and with the fact that starting a run spends Seer credits. Done means a caller can explicitly request a fresh analysis, instruction is honoured or rejected rather than silently dropped, and the tool's existing tests are updated to cover both the reuse and refresh paths.

Escrita pelo modelo de indexação a partir do texto da issue.

Descrição

MCP mcp-feedback-pattern

Pattern: once an issue has a completed Seer run, analyze_issue_with_seer always returns that run. Callers can't start a fresh analysis through MCP, even when the stored root cause is stale (for example, it points at code that has since been fixed and shipped), and the instruction argument is dropped without notice.

Reports: 1 (user feedback, MCP server 0.42.0, analyze_issue_with_seer, impact: blocked)

Current behavior (packages/mcp-core/src/tools/catalog/analyze-issue-with-seer.ts @ 516cad4)

  • L149: the tool calls startAutofix only when there's no previous run or the previous run's status is error.
  • L209-225: any other terminal run (completed, waiting for input) is returned as-is with Found existing analysis (Run ID: …). params.instruction is only passed to startAutofix (L155), so on this path it is silently ignored.
  • The input schema (L83-92) has no way to ask for a new run, and the description says Results are cached - subsequent calls return instantly (L80).

Sentry API (getsentry/sentry@fe43ef0)

  • POST /issues/{id}/autofix/ starts a new run whenever neither run_id nor sentry_run_id is passed (src/sentry/seer/endpoints/group_ai_autofix.py L286-299). An existing completed run doesn't block it.
  • GET /issues/{id}/autofix/ returns the group's latest run (get_autofix_agent_state → fetch_latest_run_state, src/sentry/seer/autofix/autofix_agent.py L558-575). So the gap is on the MCP side only.

Evidence from the report

  • The sampled analyze_issue_with_seer call made GET …/issues/{id}/ and GET …/issues/{id}/autofix/ and no POST. It returned Found existing analysis (Run ID: …) / ## Analysis Complete with the old root cause. That sampled call had no instruction argument; the reporter says an earlier call did pass one. We sample 30% of traces, so that call may not have been recorded.

Reporter's proposal: a force/refresh parameter on analyze_issue_with_seer.

Related: getsentry/toolkit#1270 adds a runId guard on the same code path that stops the tool from starting a new run. Any change here needs to fit with it. Starting a new run spends Seer credits, which is likely why the tool reuses the existing run today.

via automation evt_905b9c478746fd9deeb853f85ad7441b · Run ID dispatch_603ac936cce8aaa570e9b7eae0aa9519.

--

View Session [Sentry]

Linguagem predominante
TypeScript
Estrelas
961
Forks
179
Merge médio
15h 33min
PRs com merge (30d)
476

Preparar o ambiente

Este projeto não oferece contêiner de desenvolvimento, Dockerfile nem guia de contribuição, então a configuração fica por sua conta: comece pelo README e veja nosso guia da primeira contribuição para os passos gerais.

Primeiros passos

  1. Leia a issue inteira e depois o guia de contribuição do projeto.
  2. Comente na issue dizendo que vai assumir — evita que duas pessoas façam o mesmo trabalho.
  3. Faça um fork do repositório e trabalhe em uma branch.
  4. Abra um pull request que referencie o número da issue.

Mais de getsentry/toolkit

Todas as issues de getsentry/toolkit

Issues semelhantes

Mais issues de TypeScript

Receba novas issues na sua caixa de entrada

Um resumo curto de issues do GitHub para quem está começando.