analyze_issue_with_seer can't replace a completed Seer run

Abierto
  • ¿Algo no está bien?
#2,273 1 comentario 0 reacciones 0 asignados Ver en GitHub

Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día

Nadie ha tomado este issue todavía.

Evaluación

Dificultad
3/5
Tiempo estimado
1-2 días
Aptitud para principiantes
68/100
Tipo de issue
Nueva funcionalidad
Claridad
Bien especificado
Estado de actividad
Activo
Stack tecnológico
typescript
Área
tooling

Línea de trabajo

Read packages/mcp-core/src/tools/catalog/analyze-issue-with-seer.ts around L149 (the startAutofix gate), L209-225 (the path that returns an existing terminal run), and the input schema at L83-92 with its Results are cached description at L80. Check the related getsentry/toolkit#1270 runId guard before changing the branch, since the new parameter has to coexist with it and with the fact that starting a run spends Seer credits. Done means a caller can explicitly request a fresh analysis, instruction is honoured or rejected rather than silently dropped, and the tool's existing tests are updated to cover both the reuse and refresh paths.

Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.

Descripción

MCP mcp-feedback-pattern

Pattern: once an issue has a completed Seer run, analyze_issue_with_seer always returns that run. Callers can't start a fresh analysis through MCP, even when the stored root cause is stale (for example, it points at code that has since been fixed and shipped), and the instruction argument is dropped without notice.

Reports: 1 (user feedback, MCP server 0.42.0, analyze_issue_with_seer, impact: blocked)

Current behavior (packages/mcp-core/src/tools/catalog/analyze-issue-with-seer.ts @ 516cad4)

  • L149: the tool calls startAutofix only when there's no previous run or the previous run's status is error.
  • L209-225: any other terminal run (completed, waiting for input) is returned as-is with Found existing analysis (Run ID: …). params.instruction is only passed to startAutofix (L155), so on this path it is silently ignored.
  • The input schema (L83-92) has no way to ask for a new run, and the description says Results are cached - subsequent calls return instantly (L80).

Sentry API (getsentry/sentry@fe43ef0)

  • POST /issues/{id}/autofix/ starts a new run whenever neither run_id nor sentry_run_id is passed (src/sentry/seer/endpoints/group_ai_autofix.py L286-299). An existing completed run doesn't block it.
  • GET /issues/{id}/autofix/ returns the group's latest run (get_autofix_agent_state → fetch_latest_run_state, src/sentry/seer/autofix/autofix_agent.py L558-575). So the gap is on the MCP side only.

Evidence from the report

  • The sampled analyze_issue_with_seer call made GET …/issues/{id}/ and GET …/issues/{id}/autofix/ and no POST. It returned Found existing analysis (Run ID: …) / ## Analysis Complete with the old root cause. That sampled call had no instruction argument; the reporter says an earlier call did pass one. We sample 30% of traces, so that call may not have been recorded.

Reporter's proposal: a force/refresh parameter on analyze_issue_with_seer.

Related: getsentry/toolkit#1270 adds a runId guard on the same code path that stops the tool from starting a new run. Any change here needs to fit with it. Starting a new run spends Seer credits, which is likely why the tool reuses the existing run today.

via automation evt_905b9c478746fd9deeb853f85ad7441b · Run ID dispatch_603ac936cce8aaa570e9b7eae0aa9519.

--

View Session [Sentry]

Lenguaje dominante
TypeScript
Estrellas
961
Forks
179
Merge medio
15 h 33 min
PR fusionados (30 d)
476

Preparar el entorno

Este proyecto no incluye contenedor de desarrollo, Dockerfile ni guía de contribución, así que la configuración corre por tu cuenta: empieza por su README y consulta nuestra guía para la primera contribución para los pasos generales.

Primeros pasos

  1. Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
  2. Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
  3. Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
  4. Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.

Más de getsentry/toolkit

Todos los issues de getsentry/toolkit

Issues similares

Más issues de TypeScript

Recibe los nuevos issues en tu correo

Un resumen breve de issues de GitHub para principiantes.