atspi-common: register_tree panics (then aborts) when adapters become active out of order: push_adapter doesn't keep the list sorted for adapter_index's binary search

Fechada Para iniciantes
#820 0 comentários 0 reações 0 responsáveis Ver no GitHub

Mantenedores costumam responder em até 1 dia

Um pull request relacionado já foi integrado.

  • #821 de @DataTriny — integrado

Avaliação

Dificuldade
2/5
Tempo estimado
1-3 horas
Facilidade para iniciantes
72/100
Tipo de issue
Bug
Clareza
Claramente especificada
Status de atividade
Ativa
Stack de tecnologia
linux, rust

Direção de pesquisa

O bug está em adapters/atspi-common/src/context.rs: push_adapter acrescenta itens sem manter a lista ordenada, então a busca binária de adapter_index deixa de encontrar entradas. Comece lendo adapter_index e push_adapter, depois o unwrap em register_tree em adapter.rs. Está pronto quando os adaptadores adicionados na ordem 1, 2, 0 são todos encontrados, usando a inserção ordenada sugerida, e remove_adapter ainda consegue encontrar a entrada.

Escrita pelo modelo de indexação a partir do texto da issue.

Descrição

What happens

AppContext in accesskit_atspi_common finds adapters with a binary search, but push_adapter appends to the end, so the list is only sorted if adapters are added in order of id:

// adapters/atspi-common/src/context.rs
pub(crate) fn adapter_index(&self, id: usize) -> Result<usize, usize> {
    self.adapters.binary_search_by(|adapter| adapter.0.cmp(&id))
}

pub(crate) fn push_adapter(&mut self, id: usize, context: &Arc<Context>) {
    self.adapters.push((id, Arc::clone(context)));
}

With accesskit_unix, an adapter is pushed when it goes from Pending to Active, which happens in the application's next update_if_active for that window after AT-SPI is enabled. With several windows, that is whatever order the application updates them in, not the order they were created, so the list can end up out of order (for example ids [1, 2, 0]). A binary search then misses an adapter that is in the list, and register_tree panics on

let adapter_index = app_context.adapter_index(self.id).unwrap();

while holding the app context's write lock. Unwinding drops the adapter, whose Drop calls write_app_context() on the now poisoned lock and panics again, so the process aborts:

panicked at accesskit_atspi_common-0.18.1/src/adapter.rs:461
panicked at accesskit_atspi_common-0.18.1/src/context.rs:85
panic in a destructor during cleanup
thread caused non-unwinding panic. aborting.

remove_adapter has the same problem in a quieter form: on an unsorted list it can fail to find the adapter and leave it in the list.

What should happen

Adapters can become active in any order without the lookup failing.

How to reproduce

We hit it in an application with several windows, each with an accesskit_winit adapter, on Ubuntu 26.04 (GNOME 50, Wayland and XWayland) with AT-SPI enabled, when the windows were updated in a different order than they were created. It depends on that order, so we don't have a small program that hits it every time; the lookup itself shows it. With the adapters pushed in the order 1, 2, 0:

let adapters: Vec<(usize, ())> = vec![(1, ()), (2, ()), (0, ())];
let found = adapters.binary_search_by(|adapter| adapter.0.cmp(&0));
println!("{found:?}"); // Err(0): adapter 0 is in the list but isn't found

Suggested fix

Keep the list sorted when adding:

pub(crate) fn push_adapter(&mut self, id: usize, context: &Arc<Context>) {
    match self.adapter_index(id) {
        Ok(index) => self.adapters[index] = (id, Arc::clone(context)),
        Err(index) => self.adapters.insert(index, (id, Arc::clone(context))),
    }
}

We're running with exactly this change (on 0.18.1, which egui 0.36 uses) and haven't seen the crash since. The code is the same on main (context.rs lines 109–115, adapter.rs line 463).

Versions: accesskit_atspi_common 0.18.1 through accesskit_unix 0.21.1 and accesskit_winit; also present in 0.21.0 and on main.

Linguagem predominante
Rust
Estrelas
1.5k
Forks
133
Merge médio
16h 45min
PRs com merge (30d)
12

Preparar o ambiente

Primeiros passos

  1. Leia a issue inteira e depois o guia de contribuição do projeto.
  2. Comente na issue dizendo que vai assumir — evita que duas pessoas façam o mesmo trabalho.
  3. Faça um fork do repositório e trabalhe em uma branch.
  4. Abra um pull request que referencie o número da issue.

Mais de AccessKit/accesskit

Todas as issues de AccessKit/accesskit

Issues semelhantes

Mais issues de Rust

Receba novas issues na sua caixa de entrada

Um resumo curto de issues do GitHub para quem está começando.