Hacktoberfest 2026: the issues maintainers tagged for October, open and beginner-friendly. Browse Hacktoberfest issues

[Bug]: T3 Connect doc says held webhooks are kept per environment, but the relay keeps one inbox per link

Open Beginner friendly
#16,995 1 comment 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Maintainers usually reply within 1 day

@macodev00 is already working on this.

Since Oct 9, 2026.

  • #17413 by @macodev00 — open

Assessment

Difficulty
1/5
Estimated time
1-3 hours
Newbie friendliness
83/100
Issue type
Documentation
Clarity
Clearly specified
Activity status
Active
Tech stack
typescript
Domain
documentation

Research direction

Start with docs/internals/t3-connect.md lines 13–30, then compare the per-link behavior described in HookInbox.ts, deploymentConfig.ts, HeldHooks.ts, and Api.ts. Update the held-webhook paragraphs to accurately describe per-link storage, caps, ordering, and deletion conditions, including opting out of holding. Run the relay tests listed in the issue; done when the documentation matches the tested behavior.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Description

documentation via-triage
Before submitting
  • I searched existing issues and did not find a duplicate.
  • I included enough detail to reproduce or investigate the problem.
Area

Docs

Steps to reproduce

Summary: The held-webhooks paragraphs of docs/internals/t3-connect.md describe the relay's offline webhook store as one Durable Object per environment, deleted "when no user has the environment linked", with "per-environment order, caps, and retry timing". The relay actually keeps one HookInboxObject per managed link (one account's link of one environment), named by that link's endpoint key. When two accounts link the same environment, each link gets its own inbox, caps and ordering, and unlinking deletes only the unlinking account's held requests. The doc also omits that turning hold_webhooks_while_offline off deletes what is already held. This is a documentation defect only; the relay's per-link design is the one the HookInbox.ts, HookInboxObject.ts and deploymentConfig.ts comments describe and the relay tests exercise. Related but separate: #16988 covers the wrong :environmentId path segment in lines 7-8 of the same doc; this report covers lines 13-30 only.

  1. On the main build, read docs/internals/t3-connect.md lines 13-30.
  2. Read the inbox naming: infra/relay/src/hooks/HookInbox.ts lines 17-21 and infra/relay/src/worker.ts lines 246-253, where hold, wake and clear all call hookInboxes.getByName(endpointKey).
  3. Read what an endpoint key identifies: infra/relay/src/deploymentConfig.ts lines 128-132, and infra/relay/src/environments/ManagedEndpointProvider.ts lines 998-1022, where the tunnel name's hash is a SHA-256 of managedEndpointDigestInput(namespace, userId, environmentId).
  4. Read when held requests are deleted: infra/relay/src/http/Api.ts lines 539-558 (unlink clears only the unlinking link's endpoint key) and infra/relay/src/hooks/HeldHooks.ts lines 95-126 (opting out clears only the caller's own links' endpoint keys).
  5. Run the relay tests that exercise this behavior; the command and its output (per-test durations removed) are under Logs or stack traces.
Expected behavior

docs/internals/ records architectural decisions and constraints a maintainer would otherwise get wrong (repository AGENTS.md, Documentation section). The held-webhooks paragraphs should therefore name the unit the relay actually stores, orders and caps held requests by, and when it deletes them: one inbox per managed link (endpoint key), deleted when that link is unlinked, when its environment opts out of holding, after 24 hours, or once delivered.

Actual behavior

The doc text on the main build:

16: raw request, including the hook token in the path, in a Durable Object for
17: that environment, with SQLite storage. ...
20: relay to deliver right away. Requests are deleted once the environment
21: answers, after 24 hours, or when no user has the environment linked. ...
28: read-once bodies of up to 1 MiB that need per-environment order, caps, and
29: retry timing. Queues cap messages at 128 KB and cannot hold one environment's
30: requests back while it is away.

The code on the same build:

  • infra/relay/src/hooks/HookInbox.ts lines 17-21: "Each managed endpoint's requests live in its own HookInboxObject, named by endpoint key". infra/relay/src/hooks/HookInboxObject.ts line 27: "One per managed endpoint, addressed by endpoint key."
  • infra/relay/src/deploymentConfig.ts lines 128-132: "The hash covers user and environment, so one key names exactly one link, unlike the environment id, which any account can claim."
  • infra/relay/src/hooks/HeldHooks.ts lines 95-98, on ownEndpointKeys: "The environment id alone would also match other accounts' links of it." setHoldWhileOffline (lines 118-126) clears each own endpoint key's inbox when holding is turned off; wake (lines 128-138) also works per endpoint key.
  • infra/relay/src/http/Api.ts lines 539-558, in unlink: "Requests held for this link's endpoint go with it." It calls inbox.clear({ endpointKey }) for the unlinking account's endpoint only.
  • infra/relay/src/hooks/HookInboxStore.ts lines 17-27: the 24-hour TTL and the 1,000-request, 50 MiB and 100-per-hook caps are enforced inside each HookInboxObject, so per endpoint key. The comments on these constants still say "one environment".

The step 5 test run passed; its output is under Logs or stack traces.

The HeldHooks fixture links one environment to two accounts with distinct endpoint keys (and distinct environment public keys), and opting out clears only the caller's endpoint key; the Api test shows unlink clearing only the unlinked link's endpoint key. Storage, caps and unlink deletion are therefore per link. Opting out clears every active link proven by the calling environment's key (infra/relay/src/environments/EnvironmentLinks.ts lines 374-404 and 432-445), which is still per link rather than every account's link of the environment id. The doc's per-environment description is wrong in three places: the storage unit (line 17), the deletion condition (lines 20-21), and the rationale (lines 28-30).

Evidence
  • Expected source: repository AGENTS.md, Documentation section (docs/internals/ records decisions and hard-to-discover constraints), together with the relay's own contract in the HookInbox.ts and deploymentConfig.ts comments cited above.
  • Failure source: docs/internals/t3-connect.md lines 13-30, compared with infra/relay/src/worker.ts lines 246-253, HeldHooks.ts lines 95-138 and Api.ts lines 539-558.
  • Evidence provenance: observed
  • Local verification: reproduced
  • Reproduction completeness: complete

The mismatch between the doc and the code was established by reading both on the main build. Per-link clearing was observed by running the existing relay unit tests, which use a mocked inbox. That HookInboxObject instances are named by endpoint key comes from reading worker.ts. A deployed relay with two accounts linking one environment was not exercised. Some relay code comments use the same per-environment wording as the doc: HookInboxStore.ts lines 11-21 and HookInbox.ts line 25 ("the environment's inbox"). git blame shows lines 13-30 unchanged since #15487 added them, and HookInbox.ts in that same change already named inboxes by endpoint key, so the doc has never matched the code.

Restoration check

Failing: docs/internals/t3-connect.md says held requests are stored in a Durable Object per environment, deleted when no user has the environment linked, with per-environment order and caps. Passing: the doc identifies the managed link (endpoint key) as the unit of storage, ordering and caps, and states deletion conditions that match Api.ts unlink and HeldHooks.setHoldWhileOffline. The step 5 tests still pass, showing the doc was changed to match the relay rather than the reverse.

Triage assessment
  • Impact level: P3
  • Assessment status: supported
  • Impact basis: Only internal maintainer documentation is wrong; relay behavior is unaffected. A reader would misjudge which held requests survive another account's unlink and how caps are shared, but nothing in the product follows this text.
  • Workaround status: available
  • Workaround basis: The comments in HookInbox.ts lines 17-21, HookInboxObject.ts, deploymentConfig.ts, HeldHooks.ts and Api.ts, the getByName(endpointKey) calls in worker.ts, and the relay tests show the per-link behavior today; a reader should not rely on the per-environment wording in the HookInboxStore.ts comments.
Impact

Cosmetic issue

Version or commit

main @ 3143335fc3a568cbbb5174764961889272135cb9 (2026-10-07); doc and relay hook code identical in v0.0.46-nightly.20261007.2787

Environment
  • The latest stable release, v0.0.45, predates the hold-while-offline feature (#15487), so it does not contain this text.
  • Node 22.23.2, pnpm 11.10.0, relay tests run with npx vp test run in infra/relay.
Logs or stack traces
pnpm install --frozen-lockfile
cd infra/relay
npx vp test run src/hooks/HeldHooks.test.ts src/http/Api.test.ts -t "own endpoints|unlinked endpoint|wakes the caller" --reporter=verbose
✓ src/hooks/HeldHooks.test.ts > HeldHooks > opting out clears only the caller's own endpoints
✓ src/hooks/HeldHooks.test.ts > HeldHooks > wakes the caller's ready endpoints and reports whether anything was waiting
✓ src/http/Api.test.ts > relay environment unlink > drops the unlinked endpoint's held webhooks, even if clearing fails
Test Files  2 passed (2)
     Tests  3 passed | 33 skipped (36)
Screenshots, recordings, or supporting files

No response

Workaround

The comments in HookInbox.ts lines 17-21, HookInboxObject.ts, deploymentConfig.ts, HeldHooks.ts and Api.ts, the getByName(endpointKey) calls in worker.ts, and the relay tests show the per-link behavior today; a reader should not rely on the per-environment wording in the HookInboxStore.ts comments.

Dominant language
TypeScript
Stars
24.8k
Forks
6.4k
Avg merge
8h 58m
Merged PRs (30d)
278

Getting set up

Open in Codespaces

Starts the project's dev container in your browser, under your own GitHub account.

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

More from pingdotgg/t3code

All issues in pingdotgg/t3code

Similar issues

More TypeScript issues

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.